본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Feasibility of an Asian Version of NATO from a Balance of Power and Balance of Threat Perspective

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This paper examines the feasibility and potential impact of an "Asian NATO" in the context of evolving international relations in Asia. To analyze the possibility of an Asian version of NATO, three objectives are pursued: (1) investigating the nature of NATO and its potential application in Asia, (2) examining past failures of NATO from the perspective of the balance of power and balance of threat theories, and (3) assessing the feasibility of an Asian NATO considering political and military challenges. The paper explores the changes in the geopolitical landscape that have led to increased interest in an Asian NATO, particularly among the United States and Japan. While the current balance of power and threat between the U.S. and China has led to the establishment of bilateral and three-way alliances, the possibility of an Asian NATO remains challenging. However, if China's pursuit of regional hegemony results in overwhelming external threats, ASEAN countries may be compelled to join a collective security system. This paper highlights the complex decision-making process that South Korea, in particular, would face in such a scenario.

Abstract

This paper examines the feasibility and potential impact of an "Asian NATO" in the context of evolving international relations in Asia. To analyze the possibility of an Asian version of NATO, three objectives are pursued: (1) investigating the nature of NATO and its potential application in Asia, (2) examining past failures of NATO from the perspective of the balance of power and balance of threat theories, and (3) assessing the feasibility of an Asian NATO considering political and military challenges. The paper explores the changes in the geopolitical landscape that have led to increased interest in an Asian NATO, particularly among the United States and Japan. While the current balance of power and threat between the U.S. and China has led to the establishment of bilateral and three-way alliances, the possibility of an Asian NATO remains challenging. However, if China's pursuit of regional hegemony results in overwhelming external threats, ASEAN countries may be compelled to join a collective security system. This paper highlights the complex decision-making process that South Korea, in particular, would face in such a scenario.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Acharya, Amitav, "The End of American World Order" (2014), Polity Press
  2. Baker, Carl, "US Alliances in Asia: Doing more with less", PacNet 12, ~ (2013)
  3. Cha, Victor D, "Powerplay: Origins of the U.S. Alliance System in Asia", International Security, 34(3) (2010)
  4. Clifton Morgan, "Chinese Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century: Insights from the Two-Good Theory", ~ (1999)
  5. Anthont H. Cordesman, "Chinese Strategy and Military Modernization in 2015", Center for Strategic International Studies, 544~ (2015)
  6. Dittmer, Lowell, "The Strategic Triangle: An Elementary Game-Theoretical Analysis", World Politics, 33(4) (1981)
  7. Goldstein, Avery, "Rising to the Challenge: China's Grand Strategy and International Security" (2005), Stanford University Press
  8. Goh, Evelyn, "Understanding ‘hedging’ in Asia-Pacific security, PacNet No. 43", Pacific Forum CSIS, ~ (2006)
  9. Jack S. Levy, "Domestic Sources of Alliances and Alignment: The Case of Egypt", International Organization, 45 (1991)
  10. Mearsheimer, J. J, "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" (2001), W. W. Norton & Company
  11. Morgenthau, Hans J., "Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace" (2013), 김영사
  12. Morgenthau, Hans J, "Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace" (2006), McGraw-Hill
  13. Snyder, J. L, "The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914" (1984), Cornell University Press
  14. Upgrading the Japan-U.S. Defense Guidelines: Toward a New Phase of Operational Coordination, "Takahashi, Sugio", 6~10 (2015)
  15. Walt, Stephen M, "The Origins of Alliances" (1987), Cornell University Press
  16. Waltz, Kenneth N, "Theory of International Politics" (1979), Addison-Wesley
  17. Weitsman, Patricia, "Dangerous Alliances: Proponents of Peace, Weapons of War" (2004), Stanford University Press
  18. 제1차 아미티지보고서와 제2차 아미티지보고서: 비교분석과 한국에 주는 정책적 함의, "박건영", 코리아연구원, ~ (2007)
  19. 중국의 주변외교 전략 연구: 중국의 대북 정책 결정에 대한 함의, "이기현", ~, pp.통일연구원 연구총서 14-12 (2014)
  20. 시진핑 시대 중국의 동아시아 정책 방향, "이상국", 국방대 안보연구소, 6~ (2013)
  21. 이상현, "아시아판 NATO구상의 좌절: 60년대 박정희정권의 아시아태평양조약기구(APATO)구상을 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 50(5), pp.37~60 (2010), 한국국제정치학회
  22. 유나영, "일본 안보법안 통과와 한국의 전략적 선택", 안보현안분석, 110 (2015), 국방대학교 국가안전보장문제연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)