본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Janus–Faced Security Landscape: An Analysis of the East Asian Security Environment

3

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

East Asia has become more salient on the international stage, economically and strategically. Considering its significance, many scholars have paid attention to the regional security environment. They consider East Asia a peaceful region because there has been no inter–state war, and attempt to explore factors preventing wars in East Asia. We believe that the focus on the absence of war would not only fail to provide a whole picture of the current East Asian security condition but also give a false impression that this region is stable and secure. Accordingly, we attempt to provide a detailed descriptive look at the current security environment of East Asia by focusing on various aspects of the security environment. We show that East Asia suffers from intense tensions, while it has avoided serious interstate conflict. By drawing on various perspectives, we attempt to explain the seemingly contradictory phenomenon in this region, a co-existence of intense hostility and negative peace. The U.S.–China competition, territorial disputes, and the ineffectiveness of regional institutions have intensified intra–regional tension, undermining potentials for developing security cooperation. Nevertheless, the security role of the United States and a high level of intra–regional economic integration have prevented the occurrence of serious militarized conflict.

Abstract

East Asia has become more salient on the international stage, economically and strategically. Considering its significance, many scholars have paid attention to the regional security environment. They consider East Asia a peaceful region because there has been no inter–state war, and attempt to explore factors preventing wars in East Asia. We believe that the focus on the absence of war would not only fail to provide a whole picture of the current East Asian security condition but also give a false impression that this region is stable and secure. Accordingly, we attempt to provide a detailed descriptive look at the current security environment of East Asia by focusing on various aspects of the security environment. We show that East Asia suffers from intense tensions, while it has avoided serious interstate conflict. By drawing on various perspectives, we attempt to explain the seemingly contradictory phenomenon in this region, a co-existence of intense hostility and negative peace. The U.S.–China competition, territorial disputes, and the ineffectiveness of regional institutions have intensified intra–regional tension, undermining potentials for developing security cooperation. Nevertheless, the security role of the United States and a high level of intra–regional economic integration have prevented the occurrence of serious militarized conflict.

참고문헌 (72)

  1. Benjamin E. Goldsmith, "The East Asian Peace as a Second-Order Diffusion Effect?", International Studies Review, 16(2), pp.275~289 (2014)
  2. T. J. Pempel, "More Pax, Less Americana in Asia", International Relations of the Asia–Pacific, 10(3), pp.465~490 (2010)
  3. Etel Solingen, "Pax Asiatica versus Bella Levantina : The Foundations of War and Peace in East Asia and the Middle East", American Political Science Review, 101(4), pp.757~780 (2007)
  4. Stein Tønnesson, "WHAT IS IT THAT BEST EXPLAINS: THE EAST ASIAN PEACE SINCE 1979? A CALL FOR A RESEARCH AGENDA", Asian Perspective, 33(1), pp.111~136 (2009), 극동문제연구소
  5. Eoin Micheál McNamara, "Restraining Rivalries? U. S. Alliance Policy and the Challenges of Regional Security in the Middle East and East Asia", Irish Studies in International Affairs, 27(1), pp.201~222 (2016)
  6. William H. Overholt, "Asia, America, and the Transformation of Geopolitics" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  7. Gary Goertz, "The Puzzle of Peace : The Evolution of Peace in the International System" (2016), Oxford University Press
  8. Michael P. Colaresi, "Strategic Rivalries in World Politics: Position, Space and Conflict Escalation" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  9. William R. Thompson, "Handbook of International Rivalries, 1494–2010" (2011), CQ Press
  10. Johan Galtung, "Twenty-Five Years of Peace Research : Ten Challenges and Some Responses", Journal of Peace Research, 22(2), pp.141~158 (1985)
  11. Jonathan N. Markowitz, "Power, Proximity, and Democracy : Geopolitical Competition in the International System", Journal of Peace Research, 55(1), pp.78~93 (2018)
  12. Glenn Palmer, "The MID5Dataset, 2011–2014: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description", Conflict Management and Peace Science (2021)
  13. Daniel M. Jones, "Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992 : Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns", Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15(2), pp.168~ (1996)
  14. John J. Mearsheimer, "The Gathering Storm : China’s Challenge to U. S. Power in Asia", The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3(4), pp.381~396 (2010)
  15. Abramo FK Organski, "World Politics" (1958), Knopf
  16. Aaron L. Friedberg, "The Future of U.S.–China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?", International Security, 2, pp.23~ (2005)
  17. Jae Ho Chung, "How America and China See Each Other : Charting National Views and Official Perceptions", The Pacific Review, 32(2), pp.204~ (2019)
  18. Ely Ratner, "Rebalancing to Asia with an Insecure China", The Washington Quarterly, 36(2), pp.22~ (2013)
  19. Eric Heginbotham, "Active Denial : Redesigning Japan’s Response to China’s Military Challenge", International Security, 42(4), pp.135~136 (2018)
  20. U.S. Department of Defense, "The United States Security Strategy for East Asia–Pacific Region", Department of Defense, 42~ (1998)
  21. Joel Wuthnow, "U.S. ‘Minilateralism’ in Asia and China’s Responses: A New Security Dilemma?", Journal of Contemporary China, 28(115), pp.133~ (2019)
  22. William T. Tow, "Minilateral Security’s Relevance to U. S. Strategy in the Indo–Pacific : Challenges and Prospects", The Pacific Review, 32(2), pp.240~ (2019)
  23. Wuthnow, "U.S. ‘Minilateralism’ in Asia and China’s Responses", 135~136
  24. 권재범, "When the Kangaroo Encounters the Flying Dragon: The Growth of Balancing Elements in Australia's China Policy", Pacific Focus, 35(3), pp.491~529 (2020), 국제관계연구소[DOI]
  25. David Shambaugh, "U.S.–China Rivalry in Southeast Asia: Power Shift or Competitive Coexistence?", International Security, 42(4), pp.85~127 (2018)
  26. Suisheng Zhao, "Hedging and Geostrategic Balance of East Asian Countries toward China", Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100), pp.488~489 (2016)
  27. Krista E. Wiegand, "The Peaceful Resolution of Territorial Disputes Dataset, 1945–2015", Journal of Peace Research, 58(2), pp.304~314 (2021)
  28. Paul R. Hensel, "Contentious Issues and World Politics : The Management of Territorial Claims in the Americas, 1816–1992", International Studies Quarterly, 45(1), pp.81~109 (2001)
  29. Douglas M. Gibler, "The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict" (2012), Cambridge University Press
  30. Graham Allison, "Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?", pp.176~178 (2017), Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  31. Todd Hall, "More Significance than Value : Explaining Developments in the Sino–Japanese Contest over the Senkaku", Diaoyu Islands, 2019, pp.12(4), 13~
  32. Pempel, "More Pax, Less Americana in Asia", 472~474
  33. Nehginpao Kipgen, "ASEAN and China in the South China Sea Disputes", Asian Affairs, 49(3), pp.434~ (2018)
  34. Mark Beeson, "Is International Leadership Changing Hands or Disappearing? China and the USA in Comparative Perspective", Asian Perspective, 43(2), pp.387~415 (2019), 극동문제연구소[DOI]
  35. Huong Le Thu, "China’s Dual Strategy of Coercion and Inducement towards ASEAN", The Pacific Review, 32(1), pp.20~36 (2019)
  36. "ASEAN and the Cambodia–Thailand Conflict" (2011)[URL]
  37. Jürgen Haacke, "The ASEAN Regional Forum: From Dialogue to Practical Security Cooperation?", Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), pp.428~ (2009)
  38. John G. Ikenberry, "Between Balance of Power and Community : The Future of Multilateral Security Co-operation in the Asia–Pacific", International Relations of the Asia–Pacific, 2(1), pp.69~94 (2002)
  39. Evelyn Goh, "Hierarchy and the Role of the United States in the East Asian Security Order", International Relations of the Asia–Pacific, 8(3), pp.353~377 (2008)
  40. Paul K. Huth, "Extended Deterrence and the Outbreak of War", American Political Science Review, 82(2), pp.423~443 (1988)
  41. Aaron L. Friedberg, "A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia", pp.103~ (2011), WW Norton & Company
  42. "U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission", 2016 Annual Report to Congress, pp.478~ (2016)
  43. Indo–Pacific Security Strategy Report, "U. S. Department of Defense", Department of Defense, 19~ (2019)
  44. "“U.S., Singapore Ink New Defense Pact" (2015)[URL]
  45. Terence Roehrig, "The U. S. Nuclear Umbrella over South Korea : Nuclear Weapons and Extended Deterrence", Political Science Quarterly, 132(4), pp.655~ (2017)
  46. Robert S. Ross, "Navigating the Taiwan Strait : Deterrence, Escalation Dominance, and U. S. –China Relations", International Security, 27(2), pp.48~85 (2002)
  47. Indo–Pacific Security Strategy Report, "U.S. Department of Defense", 3~4
  48. Aaron L. Friedberg, "The Next Phase of the ‘Contest for Supremacy’ in Asia", Asia Policy, 14(1), pp.31~35 (2012)
  49. Caitlin Talmadge, "Would China Go Nuclear? Assessing the Risk of Chinese Nuclear Escalation in a Conventional War with the United States", International Security, 41(4), pp.50~92 (2017)
  50. "Overholt, Asia, America, and the Transformation of Geopolitics", ~
  51. Michael J. Green, "Revitalizing the Rebalance : How to Keep U. S. Focus on Asia", The Washington Quarterly, 37(3), pp.31~36 (2014)
  52. Goh, "Hierarchy and the Role of the United States", 361~
  53. Pempel, "More Pax, Less Americana in Asia", 475~
  54. Bruce Russett, "Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organization" (2001), W.W. Norton
  55. Richard Rosecrance, "The Rise of the Trading States, Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World", pp.31~ (1986), Basic Books
  56. James D. Morrow, "How Could Trade Affect Conflict?", Journal of Peace Research, 36(3), pp.481~489 (1999)
  57. Asian Economic Integration Report: Making Digital Platforms Work for Asia and the Pacific, "Asian Development Bank", ~ (2021)
  58. Solingen, "Pax Asiatica versus Bella Levantina", 760~
  59. Richard F. Doner, "Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States : Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective", International Organization, 59(2), pp.327~361 (2005)
  60. Steve Chan, "Enduring Rivalries in the Asia–Pacific", pp.xii~ (2013), Cambridge University Press
  61. Stephen G. Brooks, "Economic Actors’Lobbying Influence on the Prospects for War and Peace", International Organization, 67(4), pp.863~888 (2013)
  62. Goldsmith, "The East Asian Peace as a Second–Order Diffusion Effect", 275~289
  63. 티제이펨펠, "Soft Balancing, Hedging, and Institutional Darwinism: The Economic-Security Nexus and East Asian Regionalism", Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(2), pp.209~238 (2010), 동아시아연구원
  64. Dingxin Zhao, "The Mandate of Heaven and Performance Legitimation in Historical and Contemporary China", American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), pp.416~433 (2009)
  65. Susan L. Shirk, "China : Fragile Superpower" (2008), Oxford University Press
  66. Joseph S. Nye Jr, "Power and Interdependence with China", The Washington Quarterly, 43(1), pp.12~ (2020)
  67. Akio Takahara, "The Development of Japan–China Relations in the Period of Stability in Cross-strait Relations", Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 4(2), pp.119~144 (2015)
  68. "Trade Summary for China 2019"[URL]
  69. Takahara, "The Development of Japan–China", 142~
  70. "The U.S.–China Economic Relationship: A Crucial Partnership at a Critical Juncture"[URL]
  71. Ikenberry, "Between Balance of Power and Community", 88~
  72. Timo Kivimäki, "The Long Peace of East Asia" (2014), Ashgate

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)