초기 고구려 종족 계통 고찰 - 예맥족을 중심으로 -
A Study on the Racial Origin of Early Koguryo
0
조회
0
다운로드
22
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Existing studies related to the ethnic origin of Koguryo are concerned with the problem of the origin of Korean. Among others it has been laid emphasis on a matter of names, Ye·Maek·YeMaek, etc. Concerning about the ethnic origin of Koguryo, korean scholars have established recently that Maek as the name of Koguryo tribe has nothing to do with the Maek mentioned in the literatures of Pre Qin period. Ye and Maek are shown in the literatures of Pre Qin period respectively, Maek in the period of the Xizhou was named a tribe in the outskirts of Zhou. It however became a general title of a unspecified different 'ethnic group' since Chunqiu period and gradually became a general title which designated the nothern tribes since the latter Zhanguo period. Ye had been referred to as the tribes of the northeastern china, but when Maek became a general title of the northen tribes, it was changed Yemaek. The Kory land and Namyo, a chief of Ye had an effect on the founding of Koguryo and the formation of the ethnic group. The culture of the Kory has a right to be named the culture of the Proto Puyo along with the Xituanshan culture. This type of culture is distributed widely northern Manchuria to northern Liaoning Province, and affects the founding of Puyo and Koguryo. When Namyo, a chief of Ye surrendered to the Han dynasty under the pressure of Kojoseon, Han dynasty tried to establish County Canghai in the sphere of her influence. It is assumed that the geographical location was Southern Liaoning Peninsula where is one of the main habitation of Yemaek tribes, Eastern Qianshan Mts and Hun River Valley. The establishing of Chinese counties was the beginning of several tribes's awakening and unite for resistance, these tribes were making the stone mounds in the Proto Koguryo. Puyo People who had moved Puyo territory to the Proto Koguryo merged with indigenous peoples and established Koguryo, and then confronted with Chinese counties earnestly in the same period. I think why the name Maek was referred to as Koguryo in the historical records of china arises from it.
Abstract
The Existing studies related to the ethnic origin of Koguryo are concerned with the problem of the origin of Korean. Among others it has been laid emphasis on a matter of names, Ye·Maek·YeMaek, etc. Concerning about the ethnic origin of Koguryo, korean scholars have established recently that Maek as the name of Koguryo tribe has nothing to do with the Maek mentioned in the literatures of Pre Qin period. Ye and Maek are shown in the literatures of Pre Qin period respectively, Maek in the period of the Xizhou was named a tribe in the outskirts of Zhou. It however became a general title of a unspecified different 'ethnic group' since Chunqiu period and gradually became a general title which designated the nothern tribes since the latter Zhanguo period. Ye had been referred to as the tribes of the northeastern china, but when Maek became a general title of the northen tribes, it was changed Yemaek. The Kory land and Namyo, a chief of Ye had an effect on the founding of Koguryo and the formation of the ethnic group. The culture of the Kory has a right to be named the culture of the Proto Puyo along with the Xituanshan culture. This type of culture is distributed widely northern Manchuria to northern Liaoning Province, and affects the founding of Puyo and Koguryo. When Namyo, a chief of Ye surrendered to the Han dynasty under the pressure of Kojoseon, Han dynasty tried to establish County Canghai in the sphere of her influence. It is assumed that the geographical location was Southern Liaoning Peninsula where is one of the main habitation of Yemaek tribes, Eastern Qianshan Mts and Hun River Valley. The establishing of Chinese counties was the beginning of several tribes's awakening and unite for resistance, these tribes were making the stone mounds in the Proto Koguryo. Puyo People who had moved Puyo territory to the Proto Koguryo merged with indigenous peoples and established Koguryo, and then confronted with Chinese counties earnestly in the same period. I think why the name Maek was referred to as Koguryo in the historical records of china arises from it.
참고문헌 (82)
- 김광억, "종족과 민족-그 단일과 보편의 신화를 넘어서" (2005), 아카넷
- 김상기, "동방사논총" (1971), 서울대학교출판부
- 김정배, "한국민족문화의 기원" (1973), 고려대학교출판부
- 김정배, "한국고대사와 고고학" (2000), 신서원
- 김철준, "한국고대사회연구" (1975), 지식산업사
- 田中俊明, "高句麗の歷史と遺跡" (1995), 中央公論社
- 董學增, "西團山文化硏究" (1994), 吉林文史出版社
- 리광희, "고구려유물연구" (2005), 과학백과사전출판사
- 리지린, "고조선연구" (1963), 과학원출판사
- 三上次男, "古代東北アジア史硏究" (1966), 吉川弘文館
- 孫進己, "東北民族原流" (1987), 黑龍江人民出版社
- 송호정, "한국고대사 속의 고조선사" (2003), 푸른역사
- 楊軍, "高句麗民族與國家的形成和演變" (2006), 中國社會科學出版社
- 王綿厚, "高句麗古城硏究" (2002), 文物出版社
- 王綿厚, "高句麗與濊貊硏究" (2004), 哈爾濱出版社
- 劉俊勇, "中國大連考古硏究" (1997), 학연출판사
- 李春祥, "高句麗與東北民族疆域硏究" (2006), 吉林文史出版社
- 林幹, "『東胡史』(修訂版)" (2006), 內蒙古人民出版社
- 錢穆, "史記地名考" (2001), 商務印書館
- 和田淸, "東亞史硏究: 滿洲篇" (1955), 東洋文庫
- 賈偉明, "關于白金寶類型分期的探索", 北方文物 (1986)
- 干志耿, "古代索離硏究", 民族硏究 (1984)
- 강현숙, "고구려고분연구", 박사, pp.2000
- 권오중, "고대 요동군의 위치문제 시론", 吉玄益敎授停年紀念史學論叢 (1996)
- 권오중, "창해군과 요동동부도위", 역사학보, 168 (2000)
- 권오중, "요동군 중부도위와 고구려의 신성", 고구려의 국제관계 (2005), 고구려연구재단
- 金岳, "東北貊族原流硏究", 遼海文化學刊 (1994)
- 김현숙, "고구려의 족원문제에 대한 중국학계의 인식", 중국의 한국고대사연구 분석 (2005), 고구려연구재단
- 김현숙, "고구려의 종족기원과 국가형성과정", 대구사학, 89, pp.33~61 (2007), 대구사학회
- 김현정, "부여의 성립에 대한 일고찰", 상명사학, 1 (1993)
- 노태돈, "고조선 중심지의 변천에 대한 연구. in: 단군과 고조선사" (2000), 사계절
- 都興智, "試論漢書文化和白金寶文化", 北方文物 (1986)
- 馬德謙, "夫餘文化的幾個問題", 北方文物 (1991)
- 박경철, "부여사 전개에 관한 再認識試論", 백산학보, 40 (1992)
- 박경철, "B.C. 1000年紀 後半 적석총축조집단의 정치적 존재양식", 한국사연구, 98 (1997)
- 박준형, "예맥의 형성과정과 고조선", 학림, 22 (2002)
- 氾犂, "高句麗族探源駁議. in: 高句麗硏究文集" (1993), 延邊大學出版社
- 복기대, "臨屯太守章 봉니를 통해 본 한사군의 위치", 백산학보, 61 (2010)
- 三上次男, "穢人とその民族的性格について", 朝鮮學報, 2 (1951)
- 三品彰英, "濊貊族小考", 朝鮮學報, 4 (1953)
- 서영수, "고조선의 대외관계와 강역의 변동", 동양학, 29 (1999)
- 孫守道, "匈奴西岔溝文化古墳群的發現", 文物 (1960)
- 孫進己, "高句麗的起源及前高句麗文化硏究", 社會科學戰線 (2002)
- 송호정, "부여의 성립", 한국사, 4 (1997), 국사편찬위원회
- 송호정, "高句麗의 族源과 濊貊", 고구려발해연구, 27, pp.107~124 (2007), 고구려발해학회
- 송호정, "미송리형토기문화에 대한 재고찰", 한국고대사연구, (45), pp.5~38 (2007), 한국고대사학회
- 신용민, "한대 목곽분의 연구", 박사, pp.1999
- 심재훈, "상쟁하는 고대사 서술과 대안 모색: 『詩經』 “韓奕”편 다시 읽기", 동방학지, (137), pp.253~319 (2007), 국학연구원
- 楊保隆, "高句驪族族源與高句驪人流向", 民族硏究 (1998)
- 여호규, "고구려초기 나부통치체제의 성립과 운영", 한국사론, 27 (1992)
- 여호규, "고구려의 기원", 한국사, 5 (1996), 국사편찬위원회
- 여호규, "1~4세기 고구려 정치체제 연구", 박사, pp.1997
- 여호규, "고구려 초기의 梁貊과 小水貊", 한국고대사연구, 25, pp.91~130 (2002), 한국고대사학회
- 吳柏春, "東胡鮮卑時期的科爾沁及其社會經濟", 內蒙古民族師院學報 (1996)
- 王健群, "高句麗族屬探源", 學習與探索 (1987)
- 王丹, "上機房營子遺址的植硅體分析", 農業考古 (2007)
- 王綿厚, "高句麗起源的國內外代表性觀點解析-再論高句麗族源主體爲遼東‘二江’和‘二河’上游‘貊’部說", 社會科學輯刊 (2006)
- 劉景文, "西團山文化的農牧業發展探索", 北方文物 (1991)
- 유태용, "논형 길험편에 보이는 橐離國의 연구", 백산학보, 57 (2000)
- 이강승, "遼寧地方의 靑銅器文化-청동유물로 본 遼寧靑銅文化와 夏家店上層文化의 비교연구", 한국고고학보, 6 (1979)
- 李健才, "關于西團山文化族屬問題的探討", 社會科學戰線 (1985)
- 李德山, "高句麗族稱及其族屬考辨", 社會科學戰線 (1992)
- 이병도, "玄菟郡考. in: 한국고대사연구" (1976), 박영사
- 이성규, "중국고문헌의 사료적 가치", 아시아문화, 2 (1987)
- 李鍾洙, "夫餘文化硏究", 박사, pp.2004
- 李鐘洙, "고구려의 부여진출과정연구-군사적 충돌을 중심으로-", 고구려발해연구, 21, pp.337~368 (2005), 고구려발해학회
- 林澐, "西岔溝型銅柄鐵劍與老河深,彩嵐墓地的族屬. in: 林澐學術文集" (1998), 中國大百科全書出版社
- 昝維廉, "正視我國古代的五穀", 農業考古 (1982)
- 張博泉, "東北古史硏究中幾個問題", 東北史硏究 (1983)
- 張亞初, "從古文學談胡, 胡國與東胡", 文博 (1992)
- 張偉, "松嫩平原早期鐵器的發見與硏究", 北方文物 (1997)
- 田耘, "西岔溝古墳群族屬問題淺考", 黑龍江文物叢刊 (1984)
- 鄭軍雷, "論西漢墓幽州分布區", 考古與文物 (2005)
- 曹桂林, "遼北東部地區幾處靑銅器時代遺址調査", 遼海文物學刊 (1991)
- 周向永, "遼北東部山地靑銅文化族屬芻議", 遼寧大學學報 (1993)
- 周向永, "遼寧省鐵嶺市戰國秦漢考古綜術", 博物館硏究 (2006)
- 지병목, "고구려성립과정고", 백산학보, 34 (1987)
- 지병목, "高句麗 起源의 考古學的 考察", 고구려발해연구, 27, pp.147~160 (2007), 고구려발해학회
- 鄒寶庫, "釋遼陽出土的一件秦戈銘文", 考古 (1992)
- 馮永謙, "漢代襄平, 望平, 遼襄今地考辨", 社會科學戰線 (2004)
- 황철산, "예맥족에 대하여", 고고민속 (1963)
- 黑龍江省文物考古工作隊, "黑龍江省肇源白金寶遺址第一次發掘", 考古 (1980)