동아시아 지역사 서술의 현황과 과제 - 고등학교 『동아시아사』(2012) 근현대 부분을 중심으로 -
Narrating the Regional History of East Asia in Korea’s Recent Textbooks: The Present Situation and Tasks
0
조회
0
다운로드
22
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article the Korean high school textbooks for“History of East Asia” published in 2012 and their curriculum were analyzed to examine the present situation and the task of narrating regional history with a focus on modern history. The main purpose of regional history is to foster a historical consciousness which regards highly coexistence and peace by overcoming a dichotomy of the national history and world history, and by simultaneous understanding of a mutual association within the region of East Asia and the distinctiveness of each nation. The curriculum of East Asian history presented three elements as criteria for selecting contents. These were common or correlated elements, elements showing diversity, and elements of exchange and conflict. Two textbooks show different narrations of the above elements. The textbook published by Chunjae Education Inc. presents thematically related contents together, which allows readers to connect or compare the situations of Korea, China, and Japan by themselves. The textbook published by Kyohak Publishing Co. shows narration divided by each country with an emphasis on the history of international relations which attempts to complement a limitation of a single country’s history. These textbooks include the history of the native country as a part of the regional history, which led to an opportunity to relativize a nativecountry-centrism, which is a new aspect that was not seen in the existing textbooks of world history and Korean history. It would be the best if Korea’s East Asian history can boost the atmosphere that changes “victims competition” into “introspection competition” in each country. These two textbooks still have a long way to go to provide more appropriate contents as regional history. This can be achieved by emphasizing the following three tasks. First, narrate the formation process of a nation-state by extending it to the end ofWorld War Two,but do not limit the time before World War One. The second task is to enhance the level of connection and comparison and to have expanded applications of this view simultaneously when narrating each topic. The third task is to face the expansion-aimed empire which alienates East Asia and is the principal offender that has suppressed human living conditions, and to overcome it. When the principles and the direction of narrating East Asian history are desirably set, the textbooks can be improved by continued modification and supplementation to develop proper regional history textbooks. The historical research should proceed toward overcoming the structure and logic of the “Oriental history” (J. Tōyōshi ) originated by the modern empire of Japan. One may expect that Korean East Asian history education can establish an “(East) Asian history” which will replace the “Oriental history” that has been shared by Korea and China.
Abstract
In this article the Korean high school textbooks for“History of East Asia” published in 2012 and their curriculum were analyzed to examine the present situation and the task of narrating regional history with a focus on modern history. The main purpose of regional history is to foster a historical consciousness which regards highly coexistence and peace by overcoming a dichotomy of the national history and world history, and by simultaneous understanding of a mutual association within the region of East Asia and the distinctiveness of each nation. The curriculum of East Asian history presented three elements as criteria for selecting contents. These were common or correlated elements, elements showing diversity, and elements of exchange and conflict. Two textbooks show different narrations of the above elements. The textbook published by Chunjae Education Inc. presents thematically related contents together, which allows readers to connect or compare the situations of Korea, China, and Japan by themselves. The textbook published by Kyohak Publishing Co. shows narration divided by each country with an emphasis on the history of international relations which attempts to complement a limitation of a single country’s history. These textbooks include the history of the native country as a part of the regional history, which led to an opportunity to relativize a nativecountry-centrism, which is a new aspect that was not seen in the existing textbooks of world history and Korean history. It would be the best if Korea’s East Asian history can boost the atmosphere that changes “victims competition” into “introspection competition” in each country. These two textbooks still have a long way to go to provide more appropriate contents as regional history. This can be achieved by emphasizing the following three tasks. First, narrate the formation process of a nation-state by extending it to the end ofWorld War Two,but do not limit the time before World War One. The second task is to enhance the level of connection and comparison and to have expanded applications of this view simultaneously when narrating each topic. The third task is to face the expansion-aimed empire which alienates East Asia and is the principal offender that has suppressed human living conditions, and to overcome it. When the principles and the direction of narrating East Asian history are desirably set, the textbooks can be improved by continued modification and supplementation to develop proper regional history textbooks. The historical research should proceed toward overcoming the structure and logic of the “Oriental history” (J. Tōyōshi ) originated by the modern empire of Japan. One may expect that Korean East Asian history education can establish an “(East) Asian history” which will replace the “Oriental history” that has been shared by Korea and China.
참고문헌 (55)
- 교육인적자원부, "사회과교육과정", ~ (2007)
- 교육과학기술부, "사회과교육과정", ~ (2009)
- 교육과학기술부, "사회과교육과정", ~ (2011)
- 강택구, "세계사" (2012), 더텍스트
- 김덕수, "세계사" (2012), 천재교육
- 김형종, "세계사" (2012), 금성출판사
- 도면회, "한국사" (2012), 비상교육
- 이인석, "한국사" (2012), 삼화출판사
- 한철호, "한국사" (2012), 미래엔 컬쳐그룹
- 손승철, "동아시아사" (2012), 교학사
- 안병우, "고등학교 동아시아사" (2012), 천재교육
- 金潁, "近代 滿洲 벼농사 발달과 移住 朝鮮人" (2004), 국학자료원
- 김한종, "역사교육과정과 교과서 연구" (2006), 선인
- 민두기, "일본의 역사" (1977), 지식산업사
- 동아시아사 교육과정 시안 개발, "안병우", 동북아역사재단, ~ (2007)
- 양호환, "역사교육의 입론과 구상" (2012), 책과함께
- 염인호, "또 하나의 한국전쟁" (2010), 역사비평사
- 유용태, "함께 읽는 동아시아 근현대사 1·2" (2010), 창비
- 유용태, "환호 속의 경종: 동아시아 역사인식과 역사교육의 성찰" (2006), 휴머니스트
- 李能植, "近代史觀硏究" (1948), 同志社
- 李東潤, "東洋史槪說" (1953), 동아문화사
- 박환무, "靖国神社の政治" (2011), 동북아역사재단
- 정재호, "중국의 부상과 한반도의 미래" (2011), 서울대학교 출판문화원
- 강톨가, "몽골의 역사" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 미타니 히로시, "다시 보는 동아시아 근대사" (2010), 까치
- 박화리, "야스쿠니신사" (2008), 소명출판
- 앤드루 고든, "현대 일본의 역사: 도쿠가와 시대에서 2001년까지" (2005), 이산
- 楊軍, "東亞史: 從史前至20世紀末" (2005), 長春出版社
- 山本有造, "帝國の硏究" (2004), 名古屋大學出版會
- 李海燕, "戰後の滿洲と朝鮮人社會-越境, 周緣, アイデンチチ" (2009), 御茶の水書房
- 坂野潤治, "近代日本の國家構想" (1997), 岩波書店
- Rozman, Gilbert, "East Asian National Identities: Common Roots and Chinese Exceptionalism" (2012), Stanford University Press
- Tsedendambyn Batbayar, "Modern Mongolia: A Concise History" (2002), Mongolian Center for Scientific and Technological Information
- 김성보, "민족·국가사와 동아시아사의 접맥: 동아시아 역사인식 공유를 위한 모색", 역사와실학, 32 (2007)
- 박원호, "한국 동양사학의 방향-독자적인 동아시아 역사상의 형성을 위한 제언", 제30회 전국역사학대회 (1987)
- 박원호, "「동아시아사로서의 한국사」 구성을 위한 再論", 韓國史學報, (34), pp.241~260 (2009), 고려사학회
- 백영서, "주변에서 동아시아를 본다는 것, In 주변에서 본 동아시아" (2004), 문학과지성사
- 백영서, "自國史와 地域史의 疏通: 東아시아人의 歷史敍述의 省察", 역사학보, (196), pp.103~125 (2007), 역사학회
- 안병우, "동아시아사의 의미, In 2009년 하계 동아시아사 교원연수 교재" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 유용태, "역사교과서 속의 아시아 국민국가 형성사", 역사비평, (57) (2001)
- 유용태, "다원적 세계사와 아시아, 그리고 동아시아, In 역사교육과 역사인식" (2005), 책과 함께
- 유용태, "한중일 동아시아사 교육의 현황과 과제" (2008), 선인
- 유용태, "동아시아사의 의미: 연관과 비교의 지역사, In 2009년 하계 동아시아사교원연수 교재" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 유용태, "개항과 근대 국민국가 수립, In 동아시아사 교과서 집필 안내서" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 유용태, "한국의 베트남전쟁 인식과 역사화해의 길, In 동남아시아와 동아시아의역사화해" (2010), 유네스코한국위원회
- 미타니 히로시(외) 편 《다시 보는 동아시아 근대사》, "중국근현대사연구", 2012, 243~251, pp.중국근현대사학회, http:
- 유용태, "중국의 지연된 근대외교와 한중관계 -동아시아 지역사의 시각-", 한중인문학연구, (37), pp.1~33 (2012), 한중인문학회
- 유용태, "신민주주의, 20세기 중국의 정치유산", 역사와 현실, (87), pp.71~104 (2013), 한국역사연구회
- 유장근, "중국 역사학계의 청사연구 동향" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 이남주, "마오쩌둥 시기 급진주의의 기원: 신민주주의론의 폐기와 그 함의", 동향과 전망, (78), pp.215~249 (2010), 한국사회과학연구회
- 이삼성, "‘제국’개념의 고대적 기원: 한자어‘제국’의 서양적 기원과 동양적 기원, 그리고『일본서기』", 한국정치학회보, 45(1), pp.5~33 (2011), 한국정치학회
- 이삼성, "‘제국’ 개념과 19세기 근대 일본: 근대 일본에서 ‘제국’ 개념의 정립 과정과 그 기능", 국제정치논총, 51(1), pp.63~97 (2011), 한국국제정치학회
- 今野日出晴, "‘東アジア史’で考える-歷史敎育にわたるということ", 岩手大學文化論叢, (7·8) (2009)
- 鈴木哲雄, "歷史敎育再構成の課題-歷史敎育科目“東(北)アジア史”の可能性", 歷史評論, (679) (2006)
- Yu Yongtae, "The Logic of Historical Disputes and their Origins in Northeast Asia: Reflection for Communication", The Journal of Northeast Asian History (Seoul), 4(2) (2007)
