조선 開港場 監理署의 성립 과정(1883~1886)
The Establishment of the Superintendent Office(Gamriseo ) at the Treaty Ports in Korea, 1883~1886
1
조회
0
다운로드
27
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Gamriseo, or Superintendent Office(監理署), at the treaty ports was the office established to manage and supervise the Maritime Customs(海關) of Korea after 1883. Unlike the common view that the command lines of the Gamri , or Superintendent(監理), of the Superintendent Office and the Commissioner(稅務司) of the Customs were separated, the Superintendent seems to have supervised the Commissioner as a general manager of the Customs, with the institution of the Superintendent Office not existing in the first years of the Customs. But the influence that the Superintendent exercised on the Customs was limited, and he could not participate in the actual tax administration due to a lack of the knowledge about it. Therefore, there existed some ambiguous duplicity, in other words, the discrepancy between form and substance, in the relationship between the Superintendent and the Commissioner in the early period, which means that the Superintendent could not actually control the Commissioner as his senior officer. The Superintendent had several different statuses and performed many kinds of duties. First, he conducted restrictive tax administration,such as reporting the imposing of tariffs both on imports and exports or tariff exemption as the supervisor for the Customs. He also took charge of maintaining public order and security over the treaty port as a local government administrator, as the system in which the local government administrator also holds the position of Superintendent was established after the exceptional early period when those who had inspected the Japanese Customs system were promoted as Superintendent. Lastly, he was in charge of the liaison between the Foreign Ministry of Korea and foreign diplomatic envoys in Korea, the reception for the foreign envoys, and the duties on concessions as the Korean diplomatic representative to the foreigners at the treaty ports. In 1885, Henry F. Merrill was appointed as the Inspector General of Customs(總稅務司) of Korea, and the system of the Korean Customs began to change fundamentally. His accession to office was a part of the plan of merging the Korean Customs into that of China, as a means of securing Chinese suzerainty over Korea. But he agreed to hand over to the Superintendent the right to control the imposing of tariffs on imports and exports, which was one of the most important rights and had been fully exercised by the Commissioners. It seems to have been some type of benefit in return for meeting Merrill’s demand. The demand was to make all the Commissioners at the treaty ports of Korea firmly subordinate to the Inspector General of Customs and exclude the Superintendent’s interference. That meant the reform of the Korean Customs system structure into adual structure similar to that of China. As such reform progressed along with the enlargement of the organization containing the expansion of human resources and the construction of the office buildings, the Superintendent Office also became separated from the Customs to becoe an independent public office. This can be ascertained from the enactment of the “New Rules for the Superintendent Office”(監理署新章程, Gamriseo Shinjanjeong )and the salary regulations for the Superintendent Office, the exercise of the right to control the imposing of tariffs on imports and exports and the use of the name “Gamriseo” in public records from 1886. Consequently,the independence of the Superintendent Office had limits and also significance, the former being the same manner of Chinese suzerainty policy on Korea, the latter meaning the development of the administration at the treaty ports in Korea.
Abstract
The Gamriseo, or Superintendent Office(監理署), at the treaty ports was the office established to manage and supervise the Maritime Customs(海關) of Korea after 1883. Unlike the common view that the command lines of the Gamri , or Superintendent(監理), of the Superintendent Office and the Commissioner(稅務司) of the Customs were separated, the Superintendent seems to have supervised the Commissioner as a general manager of the Customs, with the institution of the Superintendent Office not existing in the first years of the Customs. But the influence that the Superintendent exercised on the Customs was limited, and he could not participate in the actual tax administration due to a lack of the knowledge about it. Therefore, there existed some ambiguous duplicity, in other words, the discrepancy between form and substance, in the relationship between the Superintendent and the Commissioner in the early period, which means that the Superintendent could not actually control the Commissioner as his senior officer. The Superintendent had several different statuses and performed many kinds of duties. First, he conducted restrictive tax administration,such as reporting the imposing of tariffs both on imports and exports or tariff exemption as the supervisor for the Customs. He also took charge of maintaining public order and security over the treaty port as a local government administrator, as the system in which the local government administrator also holds the position of Superintendent was established after the exceptional early period when those who had inspected the Japanese Customs system were promoted as Superintendent. Lastly, he was in charge of the liaison between the Foreign Ministry of Korea and foreign diplomatic envoys in Korea, the reception for the foreign envoys, and the duties on concessions as the Korean diplomatic representative to the foreigners at the treaty ports. In 1885, Henry F. Merrill was appointed as the Inspector General of Customs(總稅務司) of Korea, and the system of the Korean Customs began to change fundamentally. His accession to office was a part of the plan of merging the Korean Customs into that of China, as a means of securing Chinese suzerainty over Korea. But he agreed to hand over to the Superintendent the right to control the imposing of tariffs on imports and exports, which was one of the most important rights and had been fully exercised by the Commissioners. It seems to have been some type of benefit in return for meeting Merrill’s demand. The demand was to make all the Commissioners at the treaty ports of Korea firmly subordinate to the Inspector General of Customs and exclude the Superintendent’s interference. That meant the reform of the Korean Customs system structure into adual structure similar to that of China. As such reform progressed along with the enlargement of the organization containing the expansion of human resources and the construction of the office buildings, the Superintendent Office also became separated from the Customs to becoe an independent public office. This can be ascertained from the enactment of the “New Rules for the Superintendent Office”(監理署新章程, Gamriseo Shinjanjeong )and the salary regulations for the Superintendent Office, the exercise of the right to control the imposing of tariffs on imports and exports and the use of the name “Gamriseo” in public records from 1886. Consequently,the independence of the Superintendent Office had limits and also significance, the former being the same manner of Chinese suzerainty policy on Korea, the latter meaning the development of the administration at the treaty ports in Korea.
참고문헌 (53)
- "高宗實錄", ~
- 李永, "釜署集略, In 敬窩集略" (2009), 국사편찬위원회
- "三港口關草", 奎18082, ~
- "三港設置事目", 奎18013, ~
- "承政院日記", ~
- "日省錄", ~
- "增補文獻備考", ~
- "總關去函", 奎17832, ~
- "總關公文", 奎17830, ~
- "總關來申", 奎17829, ~
- "總函拾遺", 奎17833, ~
- "八道四都三港口日記", 奎18083, ~
- "漢城旬報", ~
- "咸鏡道關草冊", 奎18073, ~
- 閔建鎬, "海隱日錄 I" (2008)
- "(國譯)海行摠載" (1977), 민족문화추진회
- 高麗大學校 亞細亞問題硏究所, "舊韓國外交文書 13(英案 1)", ~ (1968)
- 高麗大學校 亞細亞問題硏究所, "舊韓國外交關係附屬文書 3(統署日記 1)", ~ (1972)
- 臺北 中央硏究院 近代史硏究所, "淸季中日韓關係史料 1~11", ~ (1972)
- 김용구, "외교사란 무엇인가" (2002), 도서출판 원
- 裵鍾茂, "木浦開港史 硏究" (1994), 느티나무
- 尹光云, "近代朝鮮海關硏究" (2007), 부경대학교출판부
- 하원호, "개항기의 재한 외국공관 연구" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 李鉉淙, "韓國開港場硏究" (1975), 一潮閣
- 崔泰鎬, "開港前期의 韓國關稅制度: 1880年代를 中心으로", 韓國硏究院, ~ (1976)
- 崔泰鎬, "近代韓國經濟史 硏究序說: 開港期의 韓國關稅制度와 民族經濟" (1991), 國民大學校出版部
- 岡本隆司, "近代中國と海關" (1999), 名古屋大學出版會
- 高柳松一郞, "支那關稅制度論" (1920), 內外出版株式會社
- 仁川府廳, "仁川府史", ~ (1933)
- 陳時啓, "中國近代海關史" (2002), 人民出版社
- 金容旭, "釜山租界考-特히 日本租界의 性格 및 土地所有關係를 中心으로", 韓日文化, 1(1) (1962)
- 高柄翊, "震檀學報", 震檀學報, 25·26·27 (1964)
- 高柄翊, "朝鮮 海關과 淸國 海關과의 關係-「메릴」과 「하트」를 中心으로", 東亞文化, 4 (1965)
- 高柄翊, "海外所在 近代韓國關係史料 몇 가지", 歷史學報, 26 (1965)
- 金敬泰, "開港直後의 關稅權 回復問題-‘釜山海關 租稅事件’을 中心으로", 韓國史硏究, 8 (1972)
- 金順德, "1876~1905년 關稅政策과 關稅의 운용", 韓國史論, 15 (1986)
- 김재승, "부산해관 개청과 초대해관장 W. N. Lovatt", 國際貿易硏究, 9(2) (2003)
- 金正起, "朝鮮政府의 淸借款 導入(1882~1894)」", 韓國史論, 3 (1976)
- 金鍾先, "暗使日商民 務安監理署 攔入 占據에 關한 考察", 木浦大學 論文集, 4 (1982)
- 김현석, "인천항 감리서에 대한 기초적 연구", 인천역사, 1 (2004)
- 박기수, "근대 중국의 해관과 중국구해관사료(中國舊海關史料)(1859-1948)", 成大史林, 37 (2010)
- 朴奉植, "‘메릴’ 書翰, In 金載元博士回甲紀念論叢" (1969)
- 朴哲佑, "群山港의 開港에 關한 硏究 : 1897~1910年을 中心으로", 석사, 역사교육학과, pp.1996
- 夫貞愛, "朝鮮海關의 創設經緯", 韓國史論, 1 (1973)
- 윤광운, "근대 부산해관의 운영에 관한 사적 고찰", 국제지역연구, 10(1), pp.740~764 (2006), 국제지역학회
- 尹光云, "舊韓末 開港期 朝鮮海關에 관한 硏究-雇聘 外國人 海關員의 任免과 勤務狀況을 中心으로", 國際貿易硏究, 10(2) (2004)
- 윤광운, "1883~1905년 부산해관에 관한 연구", 무역학회지, 31(1), pp.111~136 (2006), 한국무역학회
- 윤광운, "1883-1905년 조선해관의 고빙 해관원에 관한 연구", 국제상학, 21(2), pp.127~150 (2006), 한국국제상학회
- 이윤희, "청전기 해관 설치와 그 의미", 석사, 敎育學, pp.2011
- 이은자, "개항기 주한 중국공관 연구-청일전쟁 이전 시기(1833~1894)를 중심으로, In 개항기의 재한 외국공관 연구" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 李鉉淙, "監理署 硏究", 亞細亞硏究, 11(3) (1968)
- 鄭光燮, "開港期における地方制度-監理署を中心に", 上智法學論集, 42(2) (1998)
- 하원호, "개항기 재조선 일본공관 연구, In 개항기의 재한 외국공관 연구" (2009), 동북아역사재단
