조선후기 對馬藩의 조선 교섭과 1693년 울릉도 영속시비
Tsushima Domain in Diplomatic Negotiations with Joseon and the Territory Dispute over Ulleungdo in 1693
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper focuses on the territory dispute over Ulleungdo between Joseon and Japan in 1693 and the attitude of Tsushima Domain toward diplomatic negotiations with Joseon. In the third month of 1693, Ahn Yongbok (安龍福) and Pak Eodun (朴於屯), who had sailed near Ulleungdo (Takeshima, 竹島) for fishing were abducted by Japanese fishermen from Oki Province (隱岐州). The Edo Shogunate, which was briefed on the situation through Tottori Domain (鳥取藩) instructed the Edo Hantei (江戶藩邸) on the thirteenth day of the fifth month of that year to negotiate with Joseon for their repatriation to Joseon and for a prohibition on sail to Takeshima. At that time, Tsushima had long recognized that Takeshima belonged to Joseon and that that island was Ulleungdo. What Tottori Domain or the Edo Shogunate wanted to gain through the Tsushima’s negotiations with Joseon was not possession over Takeshima, but fishery rights for Japanese by prohibiting fishing by Koreans at Takeshima. However, Tsushima had indicated its position that Takeshima was the territory of Joseon from before the Imjin War (壬辰倭亂), which started in 1592. But according to the cases in 1637 and 1666, there was no indication of Joseon’s territory so Japan gained that island. Japan thus engaged in the negotiation with Joseon based on the unreasonable preconception that Takeshima is Japanese territory, and put the expression of “our Takeshima” (本國竹島) in the document sent to the Minister of the Board of Rites (禮曹參判) in the Joseon government. The first negotiation over the possession of Ulleungdo between Tsushima and Joseon, which started with the Ahn Yongbok abduction case in 1693, continued from the twelfth month of 1693 to the second month of 1694. The second negotiation was in progress from the intercalary fifth month in 1694 to the fifth month of 1695. Tsushima,which demanded to alter the document from Joseon, and Joseon, which continued to insist that Takeshima was Ulleungdo and Joseon’s territory, were in confrontation and negotiations showed no sign of resolution. Tsushima asked the Edo Shogunate, which began to study the Ulleungdo possession issue. The conclusion was that Takeshima was not Japanese territory, thus Japanese were not permitted to sail to Takeshima. Though Tsushima recognized that Takeshima is Ulleungdo and Joseon’s territory, Tsushima included Takeshima in Japanese territory. In the background to this were the new diplomatic procedures with Tsushima as the leader after the Imjin War. The order from the shogunate about Ahn Yongbok’s repatriation and the prohibition on sail to Takeshima for Joseon were the touchstones of the diplomatic ability of Tsushima with Joseon, thus Tsushima exhibited its loyalty to the shogunate at the negotiations with Joseon. Also in the background was Tsushima’s intent to process Ulleungdo since Japanese fishermen whose ships had drifted to Joseon avoided punishment even though they had stated that they were fishing around Takeshima in 1637 and 1666. A third issue was the diplomatic position of Tsushima toward Joseon after the Imjin War. Tsushima made effective use of Joseon’s defensive situation due to the Manchu wars in 1627 and 1636, and thus gained good benefit from Joseon. Tsushima tried to gain diplomatic benefit from Joseon and used illusory pressure called “the shogunate’s military prestige.” With the position of Tsushima, they thought they had to carry their point even with force and threat. And a fourth was that the negotiation was being conducted under Sō Yoshizane, the daimyo of Tsushima. At the time of the negotiations over possession of Ulleungdo with Japan (Tsushima), Joseon took a firm and active attitude, yet Tsushima maintained its earlier position. Therefore, the possession issue regarding Ulleungdo that started in 1693 was settled not as Tsushima Domain had hoped.
Abstract
This paper focuses on the territory dispute over Ulleungdo between Joseon and Japan in 1693 and the attitude of Tsushima Domain toward diplomatic negotiations with Joseon. In the third month of 1693, Ahn Yongbok (安龍福) and Pak Eodun (朴於屯), who had sailed near Ulleungdo (Takeshima, 竹島) for fishing were abducted by Japanese fishermen from Oki Province (隱岐州). The Edo Shogunate, which was briefed on the situation through Tottori Domain (鳥取藩) instructed the Edo Hantei (江戶藩邸) on the thirteenth day of the fifth month of that year to negotiate with Joseon for their repatriation to Joseon and for a prohibition on sail to Takeshima. At that time, Tsushima had long recognized that Takeshima belonged to Joseon and that that island was Ulleungdo. What Tottori Domain or the Edo Shogunate wanted to gain through the Tsushima’s negotiations with Joseon was not possession over Takeshima, but fishery rights for Japanese by prohibiting fishing by Koreans at Takeshima. However, Tsushima had indicated its position that Takeshima was the territory of Joseon from before the Imjin War (壬辰倭亂), which started in 1592. But according to the cases in 1637 and 1666, there was no indication of Joseon’s territory so Japan gained that island. Japan thus engaged in the negotiation with Joseon based on the unreasonable preconception that Takeshima is Japanese territory, and put the expression of “our Takeshima” (本國竹島) in the document sent to the Minister of the Board of Rites (禮曹參判) in the Joseon government. The first negotiation over the possession of Ulleungdo between Tsushima and Joseon, which started with the Ahn Yongbok abduction case in 1693, continued from the twelfth month of 1693 to the second month of 1694. The second negotiation was in progress from the intercalary fifth month in 1694 to the fifth month of 1695. Tsushima,which demanded to alter the document from Joseon, and Joseon, which continued to insist that Takeshima was Ulleungdo and Joseon’s territory, were in confrontation and negotiations showed no sign of resolution. Tsushima asked the Edo Shogunate, which began to study the Ulleungdo possession issue. The conclusion was that Takeshima was not Japanese territory, thus Japanese were not permitted to sail to Takeshima. Though Tsushima recognized that Takeshima is Ulleungdo and Joseon’s territory, Tsushima included Takeshima in Japanese territory. In the background to this were the new diplomatic procedures with Tsushima as the leader after the Imjin War. The order from the shogunate about Ahn Yongbok’s repatriation and the prohibition on sail to Takeshima for Joseon were the touchstones of the diplomatic ability of Tsushima with Joseon, thus Tsushima exhibited its loyalty to the shogunate at the negotiations with Joseon. Also in the background was Tsushima’s intent to process Ulleungdo since Japanese fishermen whose ships had drifted to Joseon avoided punishment even though they had stated that they were fishing around Takeshima in 1637 and 1666. A third issue was the diplomatic position of Tsushima toward Joseon after the Imjin War. Tsushima made effective use of Joseon’s defensive situation due to the Manchu wars in 1627 and 1636, and thus gained good benefit from Joseon. Tsushima tried to gain diplomatic benefit from Joseon and used illusory pressure called “the shogunate’s military prestige.” With the position of Tsushima, they thought they had to carry their point even with force and threat. And a fourth was that the negotiation was being conducted under Sō Yoshizane, the daimyo of Tsushima. At the time of the negotiations over possession of Ulleungdo with Japan (Tsushima), Joseon took a firm and active attitude, yet Tsushima maintained its earlier position. Therefore, the possession issue regarding Ulleungdo that started in 1693 was settled not as Tsushima Domain had hoped.
참고문헌 (38)
- "邊例集要", ~
- "承政院日記", ~
- "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
- "朝鮮通交大紀", ~
- "增補東國文獻備考", ~
- "增正交隣志", ~
- "通航一覽", ~
- 大西俊輝, "元祿覺書, In 日本海と竹島" (2011), 東洋出版
- 바른역사정립기획단, "竹島考證, In 독도자료집Ⅱ" (2006), 다다미디어
- "竹島記事", 국사편찬위원회 소장, ~
- 동북아역사재단, "竹嶋記下書(上), In 독도 관련 일본 고사료집Ⅱ" (2010)
- 동북아역사재단, "竹嶋記下書 (下), In 독도 관련 일본 고사료집Ⅱ" (2010)
- 동북아역사재단, "독도 관련 일본 고사료집Ⅰ, In 독도 관련 일본 고사료집Ⅰ" (2009)
- 大西俊輝, "竹島文談, In 日本海と竹島" (2011), 東洋出版
- 雨森芳洲, "국역 교린제성" (2001), 국학자료원
- 大西俊輝, "日本海と竹島, 日韓領土問題" (2007), 東洋出版
- 大西俊輝, "續 日本海と竹島, 日韓領土問題の根本資料 『隱州視聽合紀』を讀む" (2007), 東洋出版
- 大西俊輝, "第三部, 日本海と竹島, 竹島渡海由來記拔書控·隱岐村上家 「元祿覺書」·竹島文談を讀む" (2011), 東洋出版
- 大熊良一, "竹島史稿" (1965), 原書房
- 池內敏, "大君外交と「武威」-近世日本の國際秩序と朝鮮觀" (2006), 名古屋大學出版會
- 川上建三, "竹島の歷史地理學的硏究" (1966), 古今書院
- 김호동, "독도·울릉도의 역사" (2007), 경인문화사
- 송병기, "울릉도와 독도, 그 역사적 검증" (2010), 역사공간
- 신용하, "독도의 민족영토사 연구" (1996), 지식산업사
- 김호동, "독도 영유권 확립을 위한 연구 3" (2011), 경인문화사
- 이훈, "조선후기 표류민과 한일관계" (2000), 국학자료원
- 한일관계사연구회, "독도와 대마도" (1996), 지성의 샘
- 김병렬, "한일전문가가 본 독도" (2006), 다다미디어
- 호사카유지, "독도 = 다케시마 논쟁" (2008), 보고사
- 김태훈, "숙종대 대일정책의 전개와 그 성과", 한국사론, 47 (2002)
- 김호동, "조선시대의 독도와 울릉도, In 독도·울릉도의 역사" (2007), 경인문화사
- 남기훈, "17세기 朝日 양국의 울릉도독도인식", 한일관계사연구, 23(23), pp.1~38 (2005), 한일관계사학회
- 손승철, "중・근세 조선인의 島嶼 경영과 경계인식 고찰", 한일관계사연구, (39), pp.205~260 (2011), 한일관계사학회
- 송병기, "安龍福의 活動과 울陵島爭界", 역사학보, 192(192), pp.143~181 (2006), 역사학회
- 송병기, "安龍福의 活動과 竹島(陵島)渡海禁止令", 동양학, (43), pp.325~337 (2008), 동양학연구원
- 한명기, "조선후기 왜관의 역사적 의미, In 한일역사의 쟁점" (2010), 경인문화사
- 호사카 유지, "다케시마(竹島) 도해면허의 불법성 고찰", 일본문화연구, (23), pp.143~159 (2007), 동아시아일본학회
- 홍성덕, "17세기 후반 한일 외교 교섭과 울릉도, In 독도·울릉도 연구-역사·고고·지리학적 고찰" (2010), 동북아역사재단
