개항기 일본 상인의 울릉도 침탈과 염상 김두원 사건
Commercial Problems in Ulleungdo after the Opening of the Ports as Viewed through the Salt Merchant Kim Duwon Incident
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study re-examines the commercial situation in Ulleungdo at thetime of the opening of Korean ports through the salt merchant KimDuwon’s whereabouts in Wonsan. There was a method by which woodin Ulleungdo went to salt producers on the Gyeongsang Province coastand was purchased there for return to Ulleungdo to be sold for storage. In addition, commercial groups in Ulleungdo were formed in a multi-layerstructure through Japanese. Koreans also participated in thesecommercial transactions. In conclusion, it may be stated that productsfrom this area went to other areas on a large scale. Also, in business transactions the problem of how to view theactions of Japanese merchants was examined. Since the development ofUlleungdo, Koreans considered Japanese residence there to be illegal,and the commercial acts by Japanese people, too, were consideredillegal. However, there were no means to prevent Japanese commercialacts, and the people living in Ulleungdo, who depended upon Japanesefor their transportation, were forced to endure plunder by Japanese. In particular, immediately preceding Imperial Order No. 41, whichstipulated relations with Ulleungdo in September 1900, both countrieshad sharp discussions on the problem of expelling Japanese people from Ulleungdo. At the time, the Japanese side asserted that Japanesecommercial acts were done at the request of people living in Ulleungdoand thus requested that the Korean side impose a tariff. In reply to theJapanese assertion, the Korean government stated that Japanesecommercial acts were in violation of the treaty. Of course, the reasonthat the Japanese side pushed forward with such commercial acts wasnot for the Japanese people who went to Ulleungdo, but rather to hold adominant position in the confrontation with Russia. This was alsoindirectly related to the background in which Japanese sought toplunder the right to possess Dokdo.
Abstract
This study re-examines the commercial situation in Ulleungdo at thetime of the opening of Korean ports through the salt merchant KimDuwon’s whereabouts in Wonsan. There was a method by which woodin Ulleungdo went to salt producers on the Gyeongsang Province coastand was purchased there for return to Ulleungdo to be sold for storage. In addition, commercial groups in Ulleungdo were formed in a multi-layerstructure through Japanese. Koreans also participated in thesecommercial transactions. In conclusion, it may be stated that productsfrom this area went to other areas on a large scale. Also, in business transactions the problem of how to view theactions of Japanese merchants was examined. Since the development ofUlleungdo, Koreans considered Japanese residence there to be illegal,and the commercial acts by Japanese people, too, were consideredillegal. However, there were no means to prevent Japanese commercialacts, and the people living in Ulleungdo, who depended upon Japanesefor their transportation, were forced to endure plunder by Japanese. In particular, immediately preceding Imperial Order No. 41, whichstipulated relations with Ulleungdo in September 1900, both countrieshad sharp discussions on the problem of expelling Japanese people from Ulleungdo. At the time, the Japanese side asserted that Japanesecommercial acts were done at the request of people living in Ulleungdoand thus requested that the Korean side impose a tariff. In reply to theJapanese assertion, the Korean government stated that Japanesecommercial acts were in violation of the treaty. Of course, the reasonthat the Japanese side pushed forward with such commercial acts wasnot for the Japanese people who went to Ulleungdo, but rather to hold adominant position in the confrontation with Russia. This was alsoindirectly related to the background in which Japanese sought toplunder the right to possess Dokdo.
참고문헌 (44)
- "『江原道關草』(규 18074)", ~
- "『內部來去文』(奎 17794)", ~
- "『東萊關牒外案』(奎 18119)", ~
- "『東萊港報牒』(奎 17867-2)", ~
- "『法部來去文』(奎 17795)", ~
- "『釜山港關草』(奎 17256)", ~
- "『司法稟報(乙)』(奎 17279)", ~
- "『訓令照會存案』(규 19143)", ~
- "비변사등록", ~
- "統署日記", ~
- "일본외교문서", ~
- "日案", ~
- "주한일본공사관기록", ~
- "통상휘찬", ~
- "대한매일신보", ~
- "독립신문", ~
- "동아일보", ~
- "매일경제신문", ~
- "매일신보", ~
- "한성주보", ~
- "황성신문", ~
- 김호동, "한국 고·중세 佛敎와 儒敎의 역할" (2007), 경인문화사
- 박병섭, "한말 울릉도·독도 어업: 독도 영유권의 관점에서" (2009), 한국해양수산개발원
- 송병기, "울릉도와 독도, 그 역사적 검증" (2010), 역사공간
- 신용하, "한국과 일본의 독도영유권 논쟁" (2003), 한양대학교출판부
- 오성, "조선후기 상인연구-17·8세기 인삼·목재·미곡·염상의 활동을 중심으로" (1989), 일조각
- 울릉군, "울릉군지", ~ (2007)
- 하원호, "한국근대경제사연구" (1997), 신서원
- 김건우, "구한말 金斗源의 呈訴활동과 영사재판권의 實例", 법사학연구, 43(43), pp.203~224 (2011), 한국법사학회
- 김수희, "개척령기 울릉도와 독도로 건너간 거문도 사람들", 한일관계사연구, (38), pp.197~229 (2011), 한일관계사학회
- 김종준, "대한제국기 낙동강 院洞 수세권의 향방", 역사와경계, (79), pp.143~181 (2011), 부산경남사학회
- 김호종, "조선후기 어염의 유통실태", 대구사학, 31 (1986)
- 도면회, "갑오개혁 이후 화폐제도의 문란과 그 영향(1894~1905)", 한국사론, 21 (1989), 서울대학교 국사학과
- 유미림, "수세 관행과 독도에 대한 실효지배", 영토해양연구, 4 (2012)
- 유승훈, "20세기 초 일제의 소금정책과 생산체제의 재편", 국학연구, 6 (2005)
- 윤소영, "1900년대 초 일본 측 조선어업 조사 자료에 보이는 독도", 한국독립운동사연구, (41), pp.05~43 (2012), 한국독립운동사연구소[DOI]
- 이광순, "한일합병 전후를 통한 일인들의 침략행태-염상 김두원에 대한 木村乙吉 等의 해적행위를 중심으로", 한국사상, 4 (1962)
- 한철호, "독도・울릉도 ‘가지’(강치)에 대한 인식의 변화와 그 의미", 韓國史學報, (49), pp.229~259 (2012), 고려사학회
- 허영란, "19세기 말~20세기 초 일본인의 울릉도 도항과 독도 영유권 문제", 동북아역사논총, (13) (2006)
- 境港市, "『境港市史』 상" (1986)
- 吉田敬市, "朝鮮水産開發史" (1954), 朝水會
- 한국학술정보, , 2011
- 한국해양수산개발원, , 2009
- 羽原又吉, "『日本近代漁業經濟史』 下卷" (1957), 岩波書店
