본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

석탄화력발전시설에서의 TSP 및 PM10, PM2.5 배출특성

TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 Emission Characteristics in a Coal-fired Power Plant

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

To quantify TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 emission characteristics, these parameters were sampled during all processes in a coal-fired power plant. Concentrations of TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 emitted from boiler were high, and the ratios of PM10/TSP and PM2.5 /TSP were very low; this result means that the boiler emitted more coarse particles than fine particles. The ESP removed most of the coarse particles. At the FGD inlet the concentrations of TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 were low, but the ratios of PM10/TSP and PM2.5/TSP were higher than at the SCR inlet. The ESP removed ~99.8%, of the particulates but only ~99.5% of fine particles (PM10) and ~97.3% of ultrafine particles (PM2.5). Among the TSPs emitted from the stack, the proportion of PM10 was 80-85% and of this, the proportion of PM2.5 was 47-56%. Therefore, this study demonstrates that the stack of the plant emitted mostly PM10 and PM2.5, and that the ESP as the dust remover installed in the plant should be improved to remove the fine particles

Abstract

To quantify TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 emission characteristics, these parameters were sampled during all processes in a coal-fired power plant. Concentrations of TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 emitted from boiler were high, and the ratios of PM10/TSP and PM2.5 /TSP were very low; this result means that the boiler emitted more coarse particles than fine particles. The ESP removed most of the coarse particles. At the FGD inlet the concentrations of TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 were low, but the ratios of PM10/TSP and PM2.5/TSP were higher than at the SCR inlet. The ESP removed ~99.8%, of the particulates but only ~99.5% of fine particles (PM10) and ~97.3% of ultrafine particles (PM2.5). Among the TSPs emitted from the stack, the proportion of PM10 was 80-85% and of this, the proportion of PM2.5 was 47-56%. Therefore, this study demonstrates that the stack of the plant emitted mostly PM10 and PM2.5, and that the ESP as the dust remover installed in the plant should be improved to remove the fine particles

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 환경부, "환경정책기본법" (2017)
  2. 환경부, "대기환경연보" (2015)
  3. US EPA, "National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)", ~ (2012)
  4. European Environment Agency, "Directive 2008", 50, pp.2008, ~
  5. WHO, "Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen dioxide and Sulfur dioxide", ~ (2005)
  6. K. Katsouyanni, "Confounding and effect modification in short-term effects of ambient particles on total mortality-results from 29 European cities within the APHEA2 project", Epidemiology, 12, pp.521~531 (2011)
  7. A. Cohen, "Mortality impacts of urban pollution-Comparative quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected major risk factors", pp.1352~1434 (2004)
  8. K. R. Smith, "Interleukin-8 levels in human lung epitkeial cells are increased in response to coal fly ash and vary with the bioavailability of iron, as a function of particle Size and source of coal", Chem. Res. Toxicol., 13, pp.118~125 (2000)[DOI]
  9. O. W. Dockery, "An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities", New England Journal of Medicine, 329, pp.1753~1759 (1993)[DOI]
  10. Reanalysis of harvard sixcities study and american cancer society study of particulate air pollution and mortality, A special report of the institute's epidemiology reanalysis project, "Health Effects Institute", ~ (2000)
  11. C. A. Pope, "Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution", Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, pp.1132~1141 (2002)[DOI]
  12. TEX> 저감효과 분석 및 향후 관리정책 로드맵 수립, "<TEX>$PM_{2.5}$<", pp.2012, 국립환경과학원
  13. 국립환경과학원, "국가대기오염물질배출량" (2014)
  14. <TEX>$PM_{10}_{2.5}$<, "TEX>-emission and effects, IEA coal research report", I. M. Smith, 1998
  15. G. C. England, "Characterizing TEXPM25", TEX emission profiles foe stationary source-Comparison of traditional and dilution sampling techniques, 2000, pp.65-66, 177~188
  16. The importance of <TEX>$PM_{10}_{2.5}$<, "TEX> emission, IEA Clean Coal Centre report", L. L. Sloss, 2004
  17. East Asia-air pollution control and coal fired power generation, IEA coal research report, "H. N. Soud", ~ (2000)
  18. 환경부, "ES 01112.1-배출가스 입자상 물질 채취방법, 대기오염시험기준", ~ (2015)
  19. 환경부, "ES 01317.1a-배출가스 중 미세먼지(<TEX>$PM_{10}$<", TEX> 및 <TEX>$PM_{2.5}$<, pp.2015, ~
  20. X. Liu, "Effect of combustion parameters on the emission and chemical composition of particulate matter during coal combustion", Energy & Fuels, 21, pp.157~162 (2007)[DOI]
  21. U.S.EPA, "Determining <TEX>$PM_{10}$<", TEX> and <TEX>$PM_{2.5}$<, EPA Method, pp.2008, ~
  22. 국립환경과학원, "국내 배출원을 고려한 대기오염물질 성분비(speciate) 자료 구축 연구(II)" (2009)
  23. 국립환경과학원, "국내 배출원을 고려한 대기오염물질 성분비(speciate) 자료 구축 연구(III)" (2010)
  24. TEX> 다량배출사업장 성분비 구축 및 관리방안 마련 연구(I), "<TEX>$PM_{2.5}$<", pp.2013, 국립환경과학원

관련 논문AI추천

석탄화력발전시설에서 배출되는 TSP, PM10, PM2.5의 유해중금속 분포문영훈, 송금주, 이아영, 이재복, 주종호한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2018 · 제21권 제3호광산란법을 이용한 국내 석탄화력발전소 굴뚝에서 배출되는 PM10, PM2.5 측정 및 분석김영훈, 김용진, 김학준, 박인용, 신동호, 이건희, 한방우, 홍기정, 황정호한국입자에어로졸학회 · PARTICLE AND AEROSOL RESEARCH2020 · 제16권 제4호이젝터-다공튜브 희석 샘플링과 ELPI를 이용한 석탄화력발전소 배출 미세먼지의 입자 크기에 따른 성분 분석김영훈, 박대훈, 신동호, 이건희, 조윤희, 한방우, 홍기정, 황정호한국입자에어로졸학회 · PARTICLE AND AEROSOL RESEARCH2022 · 제18권 제3호고형연료제품 사용시설에서 배출되는 미세먼지 입경분율 분석김종수, 김진길, 손해준, 신형순, 유한조, 이상수, 임삼화, 임윤정, 정연훈한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2020 · 제46권 제6호제철제강시설의 대기오염물질 배출특성 및 배출계수 산정김병욱, 양승표, 이건호, 이영섭, 현근우, 홍영균한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2021 · 제47권 제3호석회석 슬러리 입자 제거를 위한 전기집진기 포집효율 평가김문원, 류태우, 육세진, 이기혁한국입자에어로졸학회 · PARTICLE AND AEROSOL RESEARCH2019 · 제15권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)