파산관재인이 통정허위표시의 제3자에 해당하는지의 여부와 선의·악의의 판단기준 － 대법원 2006.11.10.선고 2004다10299 판결 -
A trustee in bankruptcy corresponds to a third party in a false representation or not and the criterion for the good faith or bad faith
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The case for study finds that a trustee in bankruptcy constitutes a third party in a false representation. This case also finds that a good faith or bad faith should be determined based on not a trustee in bankruptcy but creditors in bankruptcy. However, it does not seem valid. In order for a trustee in bankruptcy to fall under the meaning of a third party, there should exist circumstances where a trustee in bankruptcy has entered into a relationship in interest under the new laws based on a false representation. However, in the case for study, this circumstance fails to exist. Although it is true that the trustee in bankruptcy falls under the meaning of a third party, it appears valid that the good faith or bad faith will should be determined based on not creditors in bankruptcy but a trustee in bankruptcy.
Abstract
The case for study finds that a trustee in bankruptcy constitutes a third party in a false representation. This case also finds that a good faith or bad faith should be determined based on not a trustee in bankruptcy but creditors in bankruptcy. However, it does not seem valid. In order for a trustee in bankruptcy to fall under the meaning of a third party, there should exist circumstances where a trustee in bankruptcy has entered into a relationship in interest under the new laws based on a false representation. However, in the case for study, this circumstance fails to exist. Although it is true that the trustee in bankruptcy falls under the meaning of a third party, it appears valid that the good faith or bad faith will should be determined based on not creditors in bankruptcy but a trustee in bankruptcy.
참고문헌 (16)
- 전병서, "도산법" (2006), 법문사
- 임치룡, "파산판례해설" (2007), 박영사
- 이시윤, "신민사집행법" (2007), 박영사
- 강대성, "민사집행법" (2002), 삼영사
- 곽윤직, "민법주해Ⅱ" (1996), 박영사
- 윤남근, "파산관재인- 그 법률상 지위와 권한을 중심으로", 파산법의 제문제(상), 통권 : 82
- 문방진, "파산관재인의 법적 지위와 제3자성", 재판실무연구 (2005)
- 이동형, "통정허위표시를 한 자의 파산관재인이 민법 제108조 제2항의 제3자인지 여부", 법조, 53(6)통권 : 573 (2006)
- 윤근수, "파산관재인과 통정허위표시의 제3자", 판례연구, 16 (2005)
- 송경호, "파산관재인이 통정허위표시의 법률관계에 있어 보호되는 제3자에 해당하는지 여부", 재판과 판례, 13 (2005)
- 성재영, "파산관재인의 제3자성에 관한 소고", 부산법조, (21) (2004)
- 조현욱, "통정허위표시에 의한 대출약정의 채권자가 파산한 경우 그 파산관재인이 제3자에 해당하는지 여부", 재판과 판례, 12 (2004)
- 李藤眞, "破産法ㆍ民事再生法" (2007), 有斐閣
- 園尾隆司外, "新版破産法" (2007), 靑林書院
- 山川一陽, "民法總則講義" (2000), 中央經濟社
- 川島武宜, "註釋民法(3)", pp.1973, 稻本洋之助