신탁재산의 유동화에 있어 사해신탁취소권과 도산절연 부인권에 대한 고찰
A Study on the right to revoke of fraudulent trust and deny of insulation from bankruptcy for securitization of the trust asset
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Once new trust is created, the created trust asset is insulated from the truster and any bankruptcy of the trustee, while it does not belong to the truster’s asset. Hence, the general creditor of truster and trustee are not able to collect a debt from the trust asset which has a strong legal advantage by an independent protection regardless of any bankruptcy or reorganization process. However, this advantage will be effective only on the assumption that the trust was established without any flaws during the establishing process. When a fraudulent act happens, a creditor or a bankruptcy administrator can revoke fraudulent act or fraudulent trust and incapacitate the effect of insulation from bankruptcy by means of a right to deny. That’s why it is required to apply a law for a harmony of benefit and balance among truster, trustee, creditor and administrator to avoid abuse of a right from each interested parties. If the rule of enforcing a law is not definite, it could be difficult to secure a legal stability due to many victims. Our trust law and the Supreme Court precedents have constantly recognized the interest of trust and assured the protection and independence of the trust asset up to date. This study reviewed the Supreme court precedents and legal experts’ opinions, then proposed an alternative about the issue.
Abstract
Once new trust is created, the created trust asset is insulated from the truster and any bankruptcy of the trustee, while it does not belong to the truster’s asset. Hence, the general creditor of truster and trustee are not able to collect a debt from the trust asset which has a strong legal advantage by an independent protection regardless of any bankruptcy or reorganization process. However, this advantage will be effective only on the assumption that the trust was established without any flaws during the establishing process. When a fraudulent act happens, a creditor or a bankruptcy administrator can revoke fraudulent act or fraudulent trust and incapacitate the effect of insulation from bankruptcy by means of a right to deny. That’s why it is required to apply a law for a harmony of benefit and balance among truster, trustee, creditor and administrator to avoid abuse of a right from each interested parties. If the rule of enforcing a law is not definite, it could be difficult to secure a legal stability due to many victims. Our trust law and the Supreme Court precedents have constantly recognized the interest of trust and assured the protection and independence of the trust asset up to date. This study reviewed the Supreme court precedents and legal experts’ opinions, then proposed an alternative about the issue.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강율리, "신탁을 이용한 자산유동화에 관한 법적 문제점", BFL, (17), pp.80~89 (2006), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 김건식, "자본시장법" (2009), 두성사
- 김태진, "사해신탁취소권에 관한 개정 신탁법의 해석과 재구성", 선진상사법률연구, (59)통권 : 59, pp.179~217 (2012), 법무부
- 백태승, "증권투자신탁의 본질과 수익증권 환매제도", 인권과 정의, (302), pp.1~17 (2001), 대한변호사협회
- 법무법인 해마루, "사해행위 취소소송연구" (2011), 한국학술정보(주)
- 법무부, "신탁법 해설" (2012), 법무부
- 사법연수원, "도산처리법" (2010), 사법연수원
- 안성포, "사해신탁의 취소와 수익자보호 ―일본 신신탁법을 중심으로―", 증권법연구, 9(2), pp.155~183 (2008), 한국증권법학회
- 양형우, "사해신탁과 부인권의 관계", 민사법학, 61, pp.333~372 (2012), 한국민사법학회
- 오창석, "개정신탁법상 사해신탁제도에 관한 소고", 금융법연구, 6(2), pp.111~144 (2009), 한국금융법학회
- 이재욱, "신탁법 해설" (2000), 한국사법행정학회
- 이중기, "투자신탁제도의 신탁적 요소와 조직계약적 요소", 한림법학, 9, pp.59~108 (2000), 한림대학교
- 이중기, "신탁법" (2007), 삼우사
- 이중기, "사해신탁에 대한 취소와 원상회복", 비교사법, 14(1), pp.593~626 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
- 임채웅, "사해신탁의 연구", 법조, 55(9), pp.11~56 (2006), 법조협회
- 임채웅, "도산격리의 연구", 민사소송, 12(1), pp.422~463 (2008), 한국민사소송법학회
- 서울대학교, "자산유동화 10년의 회고와 전망", BFL, (31), pp.6~44 (2008), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 한민, "신탁과 도산법 문제", BFL, (17), pp.23~45 (2006), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 한민, "사해신탁의 취소와 부인", BFL, (53), pp.6~20 (2012), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 함대영, "신탁형 자산유동화에서의 진정양도판단-민법과 신탁법의 교차영역에 대한 고찰의 일환", BFL, (44), pp.66~84 (2010), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 현대투자신탁증권, "투자신탁의 이론과 실무" (2002), 도서출판 무한
- Steven L Schwarcz, "Commercial Trusts as Business Organinations : Unraveling the Mystery", The Business Lawyer, 58, pp.559~585 (2003)
- John H. Langbein, "The Secret Life of the Trust : The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce", The Yale Law Journal, 107, pp.165~189 (1997)
- 松尾弘, "信託法の新展開" (2007), 商事法務