본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

2008 기업의 소송위험과 그 대응방안

2008 Enterprises' Litigation Risks and Its Counter Measures

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

After the economic crisis in 1997, the Korean government widely opened the financial market to foreign countries abolishing or amending some restrictions on foreign investments and took a series of structural reform measures to improve the standard of corporate governance and to enhance corporate management. In a nutshell, we have experienced many changes after the economic crisis. Some of the changes are very much helpful for the Korean financial market, but some are not helpful or even painful for the Korean financial market from the perspective of the domestic companies. For example, the opening of financial market caused confusion in the Korean financial market, which had not had competitive power under the governmental governing system. Since that reason, we have faced with so called the "Sovereign Case," which the foreign investment fund acquired the very much profits from the domestic companies and dumped the domestic companies when the foreign investment fund decided that there were no more benefits of the domestic companies. One more example of the changes is increasing litigations against the domestic enterprises that caused from the change of the corporate governance in Korean enterprises under the Amendment of the Korean Commercial Code. Since the litigations against the enterprises may cause the serious managemental loss, it may also causes the uneven balance of the Korean financial market. With this reason the Article analyses the changes of Korean enterprises' managemental environment and the enterprise litigation risks which would be caused from the changes and proposes some counter measures against the enterprise litigation risks in order to improve the enterprises' managemental circumstances.

Abstract

After the economic crisis in 1997, the Korean government widely opened the financial market to foreign countries abolishing or amending some restrictions on foreign investments and took a series of structural reform measures to improve the standard of corporate governance and to enhance corporate management. In a nutshell, we have experienced many changes after the economic crisis. Some of the changes are very much helpful for the Korean financial market, but some are not helpful or even painful for the Korean financial market from the perspective of the domestic companies. For example, the opening of financial market caused confusion in the Korean financial market, which had not had competitive power under the governmental governing system. Since that reason, we have faced with so called the "Sovereign Case," which the foreign investment fund acquired the very much profits from the domestic companies and dumped the domestic companies when the foreign investment fund decided that there were no more benefits of the domestic companies. One more example of the changes is increasing litigations against the domestic enterprises that caused from the change of the corporate governance in Korean enterprises under the Amendment of the Korean Commercial Code. Since the litigations against the enterprises may cause the serious managemental loss, it may also causes the uneven balance of the Korean financial market. With this reason the Article analyses the changes of Korean enterprises' managemental environment and the enterprise litigation risks which would be caused from the changes and proposes some counter measures against the enterprise litigation risks in order to improve the enterprises' managemental circumstances.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 고인묵, "증권집단소송제도와 회계인프라의 정비방향", 금융감독원 강의자료, ~ (2005)
  2. 김광록, "증권집단소송의 이론과 실제" (2005), 자유기업원
  3. 김광록, "기업의 소송위험에 대한 대응책에 관한 연구", 기업법연구, 19(4), pp.231~260 (2005), 한국기업법학회
  4. 신원철, "창업자집단소송에 대비하라", 창업경영신문, ~ (2008)
  5. 양승규, "상법개정공청회", ~ (1998)
  6. 이준섭, "증권관련집단소송제의 전제조건으로서의 손해배상책임제도의 정비방안 in:전경련 세미나 자료집", 증권관련집단소송법 제정과 보완과제 (2004)
  7. 장시형, "끊이지 않는 특허소송 IT업계 기술 베끼기에 ‘몸살’", 이코노미플러스, 통권 : 48 (2008)
  8. 전강삼, "소비자 집단소송제 도입 추진", 서울신문, ~ (2008)
  9. 전삼현, "소비자기본법상의 집단분쟁조정제도에 관한 소고", 상사법연구, 26(3), pp.253~273 (2007), 한국상사법학회
  10. 전삼현, "증권집단소송 ISSUE 시리즈4, “국내분식회계 과련 사례 및 시사점”", 전경련, ~ (2005)
  11. 조성훈, "비국자본시장규제위원회(CCMR)중간보고서 주요내용 및 시사점", 한국증권연구원, ~ (2007)
  12. 한국상장회사협의회, "사외이사의 독립성 및 전문성 제고방안 - 한국기업지배구조개선지원센터 연구", ~ (2007)
  13. 대한상공회의소, "기업의 소송리스크 전망과 정책대응과제", 정책건의자료, ~ (2003)
  14. 법원행정처, "사법연감 2002-2005년", ~
  15. 보험개발원, "보험통계연감 2001-2007년", ~
  16. Buckberg, Elaine, "Recent Trends in Shareholder Class Action Litigation: Are WorldCom and Enron the New Standard?" (2005), NERA Economic Consulting
  17. CCMR, "Interim Report of the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation", ~ (2006)
  18. Laura E. Simmons, "Post-Reform Act Securities Settlements: 2005 Review and Analysis", Cornerstone Research, ~ (2006)
  19. "Cendant Corp. Agree to Record Payment to Settle All Financial Fraud Allegations", Securities Regulations and Law Reporter 31, ~ (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)