본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

아동용 을 이용한 일반아동과 Sensory Profile 장애아동의 감각처리 기능 비교와 표준화의 필요성 연구

A study on comparing sensory processing abilities between general children and children with disabilities using the child sensory profile: The need for standardization

채수경
한국아동심리재활학회|2024.08|놀이치료연구 (THE JOURNAL OF PLAY THERAPY)|제28권 제2호|pp. 1-14|DOI https://doi.org/10.32821/JPT.28.2.1

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Children아동감각통합Sensory Integration감각영역감각요인감각프로화일Sensory SectionSensory FactorSensory Profile

초록

본 연구는 2022년 4월부터 11월까지 아동용 Sensory Profile을 이용하여 일반아동과 장애아동 간의 감각처리 능력을 비교. 분석하고, 우리나라의 실정에 맞는 표준화 작업의 필요성을 알아보는 것이 본 연구의 목적이다. 그 결과 첫째, 일반아동과 장애아동 간의 감각처리 기능에서 감각영역과 감각요인 모두 집단간 차이가 있었으며, 사회반응과 감각반응 그리고 정서적 반응을 제외한 모든 기능에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다(p< .05). 둘째, 미국 기준표와 비교하였을 때, 일반아동의 경우 감각영역과 요인의 모든 항목에서 정상군에 높게 나타났지만, 근긴장(25%). 사회적반응, 반응시작은 오히려 의심과 장애군에 21%가 포함되는 것으로 나타났다. 장애아동의 경우, 앉아서활동(60%), 감각추구·미세한동작(43%), 구강감각(40%), 활동단계(67%), 시각(53%), 감각처리(43%), 청각·반응시작(40%)등은 정상군 범주에 포함되는 것으로 나타났으나, 신체자세와 감각반응은 장애군으로 높게 나타났다. 따라서 현재 사용되고 있는 기준표로 아동의 감각기능을 해석하기보다는 우리나라의 실정에 맞게 표준화 작업과 함께 문항이 새롭게 재구성 되도록 계속적인 연구가 필요하다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study, conducted from April to November 2022, was to compare sensory processing abilities between general children and children with disabilities using the Child Sensory Profile, and to assess the need for standardization that suits the Korean context. Results showed significant differences between general children and children with disabilities in sensory sections and factors related to sensory processing abilities. Statistically significant differences were found in all functions except social response, sensory response, and emotional response (p < .05). Comparing with US standards, general children showed higher scores in all items of sensory sections and factors, except for muscular tension (25%) and social response, where 21% were classified under the suspected disability group. Children with disabilities were classified within the typically developing range in several sections: sitting activities (60%), sensory seeking and fine motor movements (43%), oral sensory issues (40%), activity levels (67%), visual processing (53%), sensory processing (43%), auditory responses and response initiation (40%). However, they exhibited higher rates of atypical posture and sensory responses. Therefore, ongoing research is needed to continuously reconstruct items tailored to the Korean context and conduct standardization efforts, rather than interpreting children's sensory functions based on currently used standards

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Ayres, A. J., "Sensory integration and learning disorder" (1972), Western Psychological Services
  2. Ayres, A. J., "Sensory integration and child" (1979), Western Psychological Services
  3. Ayres, A. J., "Sensory integration and Praxis test manual" (1989), Western Psychological Services
  4. Bar-Shlita, T., "Sensory modulation disorder : A risk factor for participation in daily life activities", Developmental Medicine and Neurology, 13(5), pp.18~22 (2008)
  5. Cohn, E. S., "Parental hopes for therapy outcomes : Children with sensory modulation", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(1), pp.36~43 (2000)
  6. Dunn, W., "Sensory profile : User’s manual" (1999), The Psychological Corporation
  7. Dunn, W., "Factor analysis on the Sensory Profile from a national sample of children without disabilities", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51(7), pp.490~495 (1997)
  8. Eeles, A. L., "Assessments of sensory processing in infants : A systematic review", Developmental Medicine & Neurology, 55(4), pp.314~326 (2013)
  9. Engel-Yeger, B., "The applicability of the short sensory profile for screening sensory processing disorders among Israeli children", International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 33(4), pp.311~318 (2010)
  10. Ghanizadeh, A., "Sensory processing problems in children with ADHD, a systematic review", Psychiatry Investigation, 8(2), pp.89~94 (2011)
  11. Hong, E. K., "The systematic of assessment tool to measure sensory processing ability : Provide the mean of performance in South Korea and other countries", Journal of Special Education &Rehabilitation Science, 52(2), pp.189~207 (2013)
  12. Hong, E. K., "Analysis of internal external factors that affect the sensory processing ability of normal children and children with developmental disorders", The Journal Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 16(2), pp.59~72 (2008)
  13. Kim, M. S., "Study on the developmental standard of short sensory profile : Application to Korean children aged seven to nine years old", The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 7(1), pp.37~46 (2009)
  14. Kim, J. K., "A comparison of sensory processing skill in children with developmental disabilities", The Journal Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 18(3), pp.69~81 (2010)
  15. Kim, J. K., "The relationship of sensory processing and child-rearing attitudes for mothers of children with or without disabilities", The Journal Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 16(1), pp.45~54 (2008)
  16. Kim, K. M., "The literature review for assessment of sensory integration", The Journal Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 11(1), pp.98~ (2003)
  17. Kim, M. S., "Comparison of sensory processing abilities between normal children and children with developmental disabilities", master, pp.2001
  18. Lim, Y. J., "Pilot study to establish content validity of a Korean-translated of a sensory profile", The Journal Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 15(2), pp.25~42 (2007)
  19. Lim, Y. J., "Correlation between adaptive behavior and sensory processing factor in childre with autism spectrum disorder", Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 24(1), pp.111~131 (2008)
  20. Miller, L. J., "Sensational kids : Help for children with sensory processing disorder" (2006), Perigee
  21. Miller, L. J., "A randomized controlled pilot study of the effectiveness of occupational therapy for children with sensory modulation disorder", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), pp.228~238 (2007)
  22. Park, K. Y., "A study on the readability and content validity of Korean translated version of the sensory profile", The Journal Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 17(4), pp.89~98 (2009)
  23. Park, K. Y., "Validation of the sensory profile for Korean children with pervasive developmental disorder", The Journal Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 19(3), pp.1~12 (2011)
  24. Tan, P. C., "Prevalence of sensory processing difficulties and school function in singapore", master, pp.2002
  25. Tomchek, S. D., "Sensory processing in children and without autism : A comparative study using the short sensory profile", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), pp.190~200 (2007)
  26. We, J. H., "Sensory processing of preschool childrencomparison between autism spectrum disorder and anxious disorder children", Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 8(8), pp.107~117 (2018)[DOI]
  27. Yoo, G. E., "A study on the validity and reliability of a classroom sensory processing assessment tool", master, pp.2012

관련 논문AI추천

감각처리능력을 측정하는 평가도구의 체계적 고찰 : 국외와 국내 수행의 평균 제시김경미, 홍은경특수교육재활과학연구소 · 특수교육재활과학연구2013 · 제52권 제2호학교용 감각처리 평가도구의 일반 아동과 주의력 결핍⋅과잉행동장애 아동의 비교를 통해서 본 판별타당도 검증: ROC 분석유은영, 조선영대한신경계작업치료학회 · 재활치료과학2025 · 제14권 제1호장애유아의 감각통합 기능 특성 분석김영미, 박재국한국특수아동학회 · 특수아동교육연구2009 · 제11권 제1호유아의 감각처리조절과 문제행동의 관계김명선, 하은혜한국아동심리재활학회 · 놀이치료연구2019 · 제23권 제1호장애유아와 비장애유아의 감각통합기능과 운동기술능력 비교박재국한국특수아동학회 · 특수아동교육연구2010 · 제12권 제4호장애유아의 감각통합 기능 특성에 대한 주양육자와 교사의 인식김영미, 김회용한국지체·중복·건강장애교육학회 · 지체.중복.건강장애연구2010 · 제53권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

어머니 행복감과 양육행동이 아동의 행복감에 미치는 영향이정자pp. 15-26학령기 장애아동 어머니의 심리지원 서비스 경험 및 요구에 대한 질적연구이산하, 홍주연pp. 27-38애착외상 아동의 외상증상 회복을 위한 ARC 기반 부모교육 프로그램 개발최은영, 주미선pp. 39-56청소년이 지각한 스트레스와 학교적응의 관계에서 자아존중감 불안의 매개효과 : 자해 비자해 집단 비교최진아, 김영화pp. 57-69
원문 보기