본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

특허정정심판 청구시기 제한에 대한 고찰

Restriction on post-grant amendment

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

A patentee may request a trial to amend the description or drawing(s) of a patented invention in cases (ⅰ) where the scope of claims is narrowed; (ⅱ) where a clerical error is corrected; or (ⅲ) where an ambiguous description is clarified, except when an invalidation trial against the patent is pending. If a post-grant amendment is allowed while an action against invalidation trial is pending before the Supreme Court, the action should be remanded to the Patent Court so that the Patent Court reconsider the trial decision according to the amended claims. To avoid this kind of duplicating efforts, in Japan, a request for a trial for post-grant amendment may not be filed from the time the relevant trial for patent invalidation has become pending before the Patent Office to the time the trial decision has become final and binding; provided, however, that this shall not apply to a request for a trial for post-grant amendment filed within 90 days from the day an action against the trial decision in the trial for patent invalidation is instituted. In the UK, where there are pending before the court or the comptroller proceedings in which the validity of the patent may be put in issue, post-grant amendment may be allowed only in such proceedings by the Comptroller or by the court. Finally, in the US, post-grant amendment may be made in the form of disclaimer, certificate of correction, reexamination, or reissue and action in reissue applications in which there is an indication of concurrent litigation usually will be suspended. This article suggests that a request for a trial for post-grant amendment should be filed only within certain period of time from the day an action against the trial decision in the trial for patent invalidation is instituted. This article also suggests as a long term solution that where there are pending before the court or the comptroller proceedings in which the validity of the patent may be put in issue, post-grant amendment may be allowed only in such proceedings.

Abstract

A patentee may request a trial to amend the description or drawing(s) of a patented invention in cases (ⅰ) where the scope of claims is narrowed; (ⅱ) where a clerical error is corrected; or (ⅲ) where an ambiguous description is clarified, except when an invalidation trial against the patent is pending. If a post-grant amendment is allowed while an action against invalidation trial is pending before the Supreme Court, the action should be remanded to the Patent Court so that the Patent Court reconsider the trial decision according to the amended claims. To avoid this kind of duplicating efforts, in Japan, a request for a trial for post-grant amendment may not be filed from the time the relevant trial for patent invalidation has become pending before the Patent Office to the time the trial decision has become final and binding; provided, however, that this shall not apply to a request for a trial for post-grant amendment filed within 90 days from the day an action against the trial decision in the trial for patent invalidation is instituted. In the UK, where there are pending before the court or the comptroller proceedings in which the validity of the patent may be put in issue, post-grant amendment may be allowed only in such proceedings by the Comptroller or by the court. Finally, in the US, post-grant amendment may be made in the form of disclaimer, certificate of correction, reexamination, or reissue and action in reissue applications in which there is an indication of concurrent litigation usually will be suspended. This article suggests that a request for a trial for post-grant amendment should be filed only within certain period of time from the day an action against the trial decision in the trial for patent invalidation is instituted. This article also suggests as a long term solution that where there are pending before the court or the comptroller proceedings in which the validity of the patent may be put in issue, post-grant amendment may be allowed only in such proceedings.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 박성수, "무효심판 사건의 계속 중 정정심결이 확정된 경우의 심리범위", 특허판례연구 (2009), 박영사
  2. 이두형, "특허의 무효화와 특허의 정정", 지식재산21 (2008), 특허청
  3. 이상경, "지적재산권소송법" (1998), 육법사
  4. 이시윤, "신민사소송법 5판" (2009), 박영사
  5. 특허법원, "특허재판실무편람" (2002)
  6. 특허법원 지적재산소송실무연구회, "지적재산소송실무연구" (2006), 박영사
  7. 특허심판원, "심판편람(제9판)" (2009)
  8. 특허청, "조문별 특허법해설" (2007)
  9. 최성준, "정정심결이 확정된 경우 무효심판에 미치는 영향. in : 정보법 판례백선" (2006), 박영사
  10. 日本特許廳, "新制度における審決取消訴訟・訂正審判の在り方", 第4回紛争処理小委員会資料 (2002)
  11. 日本特許廳 特許第2委員会第5小委員会, "訂正審判・訂正の請求と特許権侵害訴訟との関係について―訂正による特許権侵害訴訟の審理期間の長期化と,訂正回数の制限について", 知財管理, 58(11) (2008)
  12. "UK IPO, Manual of Patent Practice", ~
  13. "USPTO, Manual of Patent Examining Procedure", ~
  14. "CIPO, Manual of Patent Office Practice", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)