본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 결과구문의 구속 형태소 ‘-게’에 대한 형태-통사론적 분석

Morpho-syntactic account of bound morpheme ‘-ge’ in the resultative construction in Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Jeong, Haeja. “Morpho-syntactic account of bound morpheme ‘-ge’ in the resultative construction in Korean.” Studies in English Language & Literature. 37.4 (2011): 303-25. This paper is to analyze ‘-ge’ which is assumed here as a delimiter affix in the resultative construction in Korean in terms of morpho-syntactic view. Despite a variety of status of ‘-ge’ morphologically and syntactically, I propose ‘-ge’ should be classified into 3 types: derivational, inflectional affix and a stem-extender. The ‘-ge’ appearing in the resultative construction in Korean is assumed to be inserted in the syntactic position which has a sister node having an abstract clitic position with a feature of [+delimiter]. This proposal shows to bring a parsimonious account of the properties of resultative construction in Korean based on the hypothesis Snyder(1995). With this track, the affix ‘-ge’ is shown to be responsible for checking telicity, which is one of aspectual features and merges with adjectival/(a few group of) verbal phrase, resulting in a resultative interpretation with the help of main predicates. For the incompatibility with resultative construction with some groups, I argue the application of Tortora’s Further Specification Constraint is better one to explain its ungrammaticality. (Jeonbuk National University)

Abstract

Jeong, Haeja. “Morpho-syntactic account of bound morpheme ‘-ge’ in the resultative construction in Korean.” Studies in English Language & Literature. 37.4 (2011): 303-25. This paper is to analyze ‘-ge’ which is assumed here as a delimiter affix in the resultative construction in Korean in terms of morpho-syntactic view. Despite a variety of status of ‘-ge’ morphologically and syntactically, I propose ‘-ge’ should be classified into 3 types: derivational, inflectional affix and a stem-extender. The ‘-ge’ appearing in the resultative construction in Korean is assumed to be inserted in the syntactic position which has a sister node having an abstract clitic position with a feature of [+delimiter]. This proposal shows to bring a parsimonious account of the properties of resultative construction in Korean based on the hypothesis Snyder(1995). With this track, the affix ‘-ge’ is shown to be responsible for checking telicity, which is one of aspectual features and merges with adjectival/(a few group of) verbal phrase, resulting in a resultative interpretation with the help of main predicates. For the incompatibility with resultative construction with some groups, I argue the application of Tortora’s Further Specification Constraint is better one to explain its ungrammaticality. (Jeonbuk National University)

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김영희, "국어의 통사. 의미론" (1983), 탑출판사
  2. 박소영, "결과 부사형 ‘-게’에 대한 연구", 한글, pp.45~77 (2001), 한글학회
  3. 서정수, "어미‘게’와 ‘도록’의 대비연구", 말, 13, pp.23~52 (1988), 연세대 한국어 학당
  4. 임홍빈, "부사화의 대상성", 국어학, pp.39~60 (1976), 국어학회
  5. 유현경, "형용사에 결합된 어미 ‘-게’ 연구", 한글, (273), pp.99~123 (2006), 한글학회
  6. 윤평현, "‘-게, -도록‘의 의미에 대하여", 국어국문학, pp.307~318 (1988), 국어국문학회
  7. 최현배, "우리말본" (1971), 정음사
  8. 최명원, "한국어와 독일어의 소절분석", 독일문학, pp.387~406 (1997), 한국 독어독문학회
  9. 이정민, "의미 구조의 표상과 실현" (2000), 소화출판사
  10. 어찌마디의 통어적 연구, "한글", 2002, 99~128, pp.한글학회
  11. Aronoff, M., "Word Formation in Generative Grammar" (1980), MIT P
  12. Carrier, J, "The Argument Structure and Syntactic Structure of Resultatives", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.173~234 (1992)
  13. Chomsky, N., "Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation, In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar", pp.417~454 (1991), MIT P
  14. Fabb, N., "English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.527~539 (1988)
  15. Hoekstra, Teun, "Small clause results", Lingua, 74, pp.101~139 (1988)
  16. Jespersen, O., "A Modern English Grammar" (1954), Allen
  17. Katamba, F., "Morphology" (1993), Macmillan
  18. Keyser, S. J, "Re: The Abstract Clitic Hypothesis", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.89~125 (1992)
  19. Kim, J-B., "Contraints on the Formation of Korean and English Resultative Constructions", NELS, 29, pp.137~151 (1999)
  20. Perlmutter, D. M., "Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis", BLS, 4 (1978)
  21. Pustejovsky, J., "Generative Lexicon" (1995), MIT P
  22. Rappaport Hovav, "An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives", Language, 77, pp.766~797 (2001)
  23. Snyder, William, "A Neo-Davidsonian Approach to Resultatives, Particles, and Datives", NELS, 25, pp.457~471 (1995)
  24. Tang, S. W., "The Parametric Approach to the Resultative Construction in Chinese and English", UCI Working Papers in Linguistics, 통권 : 3, pp.203~226 (1997)
  25. Tortora, C. M., "Verbs of Inherently directed motion are compatible with resultative phrases", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.338~345 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)