유형별 청자의 명절 갈등 표현 해석 양상 연구: 취업준비생을 중심으로
A Study on Interpretation Patterns about Korean Holiday Conflict Expressions on the Basis of Hearer’s Type: Job Seekers’ Cases
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this study is to investigate language usages of job seekers who participate in conflict family discourses during Korean holiday with respect to hearers’ types. Hearers are classified into three types on the basis of three self-construal types; independent, interdependent, and ambivalent self-consrtual type (Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Ting-Toomey, et al., 2001). Online self-report questionnaire is used to identify demographic data of subjects (N=100), their self-construal types, and linguistic responses to conflict expressions. The focus of analysis is laid on linearly examining a meaning-interpretation and a relation-decision process in order to understand their interpretation patterns through the conversation-developing analysis and the face-negotiation theory. As for conflict expressions, each self-construal type shows unique linguistic results; (a) independent hearers (N=44) predominantly make rebuttals, refusals, or ignorance; (b) interdependent hearers (N=11) make partial refusals, acceptances, or acknowledgments; (c) ambivalent hearers (N=45) make rebuttals, acceptances, or avoidance, especially depending on the given context and their conversational goal.
Abstract
The goal of this study is to investigate language usages of job seekers who participate in conflict family discourses during Korean holiday with respect to hearers’ types. Hearers are classified into three types on the basis of three self-construal types; independent, interdependent, and ambivalent self-consrtual type (Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Ting-Toomey, et al., 2001). Online self-report questionnaire is used to identify demographic data of subjects (N=100), their self-construal types, and linguistic responses to conflict expressions. The focus of analysis is laid on linearly examining a meaning-interpretation and a relation-decision process in order to understand their interpretation patterns through the conversation-developing analysis and the face-negotiation theory. As for conflict expressions, each self-construal type shows unique linguistic results; (a) independent hearers (N=44) predominantly make rebuttals, refusals, or ignorance; (b) interdependent hearers (N=11) make partial refusals, acceptances, or acknowledgments; (c) ambivalent hearers (N=45) make rebuttals, acceptances, or avoidance, especially depending on the given context and their conversational goal.
참고문헌 (28)
- Brinker, Klaus, "Eine Einfuhrung" (2006)
- Brown, Penelop, "Politeness; Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Chen, Rong, "Self-politeness: A proposal", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.87~106 (2001)
- 정현숙, "부모 ‒대학생 세대 간 갈등 사례연구 : 실제 커뮤니케이션에 초점을 둔 다차원적 접근법을 중심으로", 한국소통학보, (11), pp.7~46 (2009), 한국소통학회
- Goffman, Erving, "Interaction Ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior" (1967), Penguin University Books
- 한승훈, "청자의도(H-intentions)의 개념화와 방향성 연구: 가족 담화를 중심으로", 어학연구, 51(3), pp.815~841 (2015), 언어교육원
- Jeon, Kyung-Mi, "Perception and Conflict of Married Women Immigrants on Korean Traditional Holiday Culture", proceedings in Korean Language and Culture Education Society, 1, pp.335~ (2013)
- 강길호, "양자체면이론 : 한국적 커뮤니케이션 이론화의 한 시도", 한국소통학보, (12), pp.106~131 (2009), 한국소통학회
- 김지희, "대학생 자녀와 부모의 의사소통 증진 방안 연구 - 일상 대화 분석을 중심으로 -", 화법연구, (28), pp.1~36 (2015), 한국화법학회[DOI]
- 김순종, "명절스트레스에 관한 연구 : 가족가치관, 명절인식, 명절차례행동의 영향을 중심으로", 박사, 생활문화소비자학과, pp.2014
- Kim, Young-Wook, "Face, Communication, and Conflict resolution: Research on possibility of communication and face-communication model", proceedings in Korean Society For Journalism And Communications Studies, 5, pp.315~360 (2011)
- 구현정, "장모-사위 대화의 실태 연구 -사위 설문 조사를 중심으로-", 화법연구, (26), pp.205~232 (2014), 한국화법학회[DOI]
- Leech, Geoffrey N., "Principles of pragmatics" (1983), Longman
- Markus, Hazel R., "Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation", Psychological Review, 98, pp.224~253 (1991)
- Mills, Sara, "Gender and Politeness" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- 노은희, "세대 간 갈등 대화에서의 말대답·말대꾸 양상 분석", 화법연구, (29), pp.65~102 (2015), 한국화법학회[DOI]
- Oetzel, John G., "The effects of ethnicity and self-construals on self-reported conflict styles", Communication Reports, 11, pp.133~144 (1998)
- Oetzel, John G., "Face concerns in Interpersonal Conflict: A cross-Cultural Empirical Test of the Face Negotiation Theory", Communication research, 30(6), pp.599~624 (2003)
- Sifianou, Maria, "Disagreements, face and politeness", Journal of Pragmatics, 44, pp.1554~1564 (2012)
- Singelis, Theodore M., "Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior", Human Communication Research, 22, pp.354~389 (1995)
- Ting-Toomey, Stella, "Intercultural Communication", pp.360~371 (1994)
- Ting-Toomey, Stella, "Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory", International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, pp.187~225 (1998)
- Ting-Toomey, Stella, "Self-Construal Types and Conflict Management Styles", Communication Reports, 14(2), pp.87~104 (2001)
- Watts, Richard J., "Politeness" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- 윤숙자, "대학생의 부모-자녀 의사소통정도와 가족탄력성의 관계", 디지털융복합연구, 11(8), pp.23~30 (2013), 한국디지털정책학회
- "뉴스토마토" (2017)[URL]
- "한국경제" (2017)[URL]
- "이데일리" (2016)[URL]