본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

모음비음화와 비중복음화에 대한 음운규칙과 제약접근 방식 비교

A comparison between rule-based approaches and constraint-based ones in vowel nasalization and degemination

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Oh, Kwan-Young. “A comparison between rule-based approaches and constraint-based ones in vowel nasalization and degemination.” Studies in English Language & Literature. 37.3 (2011): 267-91. The purpose of this study is to show that when we treat vowel nasalization and degemination with coalescence, constraint-based approaches can be explained better than rule-based approaches from the comparison of two phonological approaches. For vowel nasalization I first analyze it by applying a nasalization and a nasal deletion rule in sequence, and then a transformational rule, but these are still inadequate from the viewpoint of coalescence and also can’t capture the functional unity of rules. Instead I can explain this nasalization appropriately by using constraints and setting a new constraint, which blocks the nasalized vowel plus nasal consonant sequence. For degemination, first I analyze it by using the assimilation rule and cluster simplification and then the transformational rule, but all are unsatisfactory in explaining degemination as coalescence. Therefore I can analyze it by using some related constraints and making a new constraint, which is driven by the necessity of accounting for the assimilation of the given examples. As the result, I can explain degemination more concisely and consistently than can rule-based approaches. (Chonnam National University)

Abstract

Oh, Kwan-Young. “A comparison between rule-based approaches and constraint-based ones in vowel nasalization and degemination.” Studies in English Language & Literature. 37.3 (2011): 267-91. The purpose of this study is to show that when we treat vowel nasalization and degemination with coalescence, constraint-based approaches can be explained better than rule-based approaches from the comparison of two phonological approaches. For vowel nasalization I first analyze it by applying a nasalization and a nasal deletion rule in sequence, and then a transformational rule, but these are still inadequate from the viewpoint of coalescence and also can’t capture the functional unity of rules. Instead I can explain this nasalization appropriately by using constraints and setting a new constraint, which blocks the nasalized vowel plus nasal consonant sequence. For degemination, first I analyze it by using the assimilation rule and cluster simplification and then the transformational rule, but all are unsatisfactory in explaining degemination as coalescence. Therefore I can analyze it by using some related constraints and making a new constraint, which is driven by the necessity of accounting for the assimilation of the given examples. As the result, I can explain degemination more concisely and consistently than can rule-based approaches. (Chonnam National University)

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 양선기, "영어음운론" (2009), 한국문화사
  2. 오관영, "이화에 대한 통시적 접근과 유표제약-OCP의 비교", 영어영문학21, 21(2), pp.173~196 (2008), 21세기영어영문학회
  3. 오관영, "영어 구개음화와 순음화 현상에 대한 조화이론적 접근", 영어영문학21, 24(2), pp.99~122 (2011), 21세기영어영문학회
  4. 전상범, "음운론" (2004), 서울대학교출판부
  5. 전상범, "영어음성학개론" (2005), 을류문화사
  6. Chomsky, Noam, "The sound pattern of English" (1968), Harper and Row
  7. Côté, Marie-Hélène, "Consonant cluster phonotactics: aperceptual approach", 박사, pp.2000
  8. de Lacy, Paul, "The Formal Expression of Markedness", 박사, pp.2002
  9. Gnanadesikan, Amalia, "Phonology with ternary scales", 박사, pp.1997
  10. Gnanadesikan, Amalia, "Markedness and Faithfulness constraints in child phonology, In Constraints in Phonological Acquisition", pp.88~95 (2004), Cambridge press
  11. Theoretical implications of OCP effects on features in OT, "Fukazawa, Haruka", ~, pp.ROA-307 (1999)
  12. Hall, Tracy Alan, "Syllabically conditioned coalescence and deletion in Zoque: an optimality-theoretic approach", Linguistics, 38(4), pp.711~738 (2000)
  13. Hyman, Larry, "Phonology: theory and analysis" (1975), Holt, Rinehart, Winston
  14. Kager, René, "Optimality Theory" (1999), Cambridge UP
  15. Katamba, Francis, "Morphology" (1993), Macmillan
  16. Kenstowicz, Michael, "Generative phonology description and theory" (1979), Academic Press
  17. Ladefoged, Peter, "A course in phonetics" (2006), Thomson Wadsworth
  18. Lamontagne, Greg, "correspondence account of coalescence, In University of Massachusetts occasional papers inlinguistics 18", pp.211~224 (1995), GLSA
  19. McCarthy, John, "Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman, Walsh Dickey, and Urbanczyk", pp.249~384 (1995), Graduate Linguistic Student Association
  20. 박정희, "English Voicing Assimilation", 영어영문학연구, 35(4), pp.291~306 (2009), 대한영어영문학회
  21. Prince, Alan, "Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar" (1993), Ms. Rutgers University, New Brunswick & University of Colorado
  22. Roca, Iggy, "A course in phonology" (1999), Blackwell publisher
  23. Schane, Sanford. A., "Generative phonology" (1973), Prentice Hall
  24. Shockey, Linda, "Sound Patterns of Spoken English" (2003), Blackwell Publishing
  25. Wheeler, Max, W., "Cluster reduction: deletion or coalescence", Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 4, pp.57~82 (2005)
  26. Wolfram, Walt, "Generative phonology: the basic model", Paper presented at the preconvention workshop on ‘Linguistics and Reading: theory into practice’ (1974), International Reading Association
  27. Wolfram, Walt, "Phonological analysis: Focus on American" (1981), Prentice Hall

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)