본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Nasal Place Assimilation in Korean and English

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper attempts to account for nasal place assimilation, focusing on phonological variation which has been problematic in OT. We review the previous analyses of nasal place assimilation and two approaches to phonological variation. The multiple constraint hierarchies (or co-phonologies) approach and free-ranking approach may account for variation but have problems such as radically different subgrammars/ outputs or various subhierarchies. Rank-Ordering Model of Eval (ROE) proposed by Coetzee (2006) is applied to phonological variation with regard to nasal place assimilation in Korean and English. In ROE, Eval assigns a harmonic rank-ordering to the whole candidate set, and two or more candidates are possible as variants. This model presents an analysis of variation without radically different subgrammars/outputs or various subhierarchies. In order to account for phonological variation regarding nasal place assimilation, we use constraints ID-IO(Onset), *[n[+labial]]Wd, Max ([+velar]), [...V_(str)N(αP)+C(αP)...], ID-IO(Coda), and Agree(Place) and a single ranking hierarchy. This analysis needs further research with regard to the frequency of variants depending on speech styles in the future.

Abstract

This paper attempts to account for nasal place assimilation, focusing on phonological variation which has been problematic in OT. We review the previous analyses of nasal place assimilation and two approaches to phonological variation. The multiple constraint hierarchies (or co-phonologies) approach and free-ranking approach may account for variation but have problems such as radically different subgrammars/ outputs or various subhierarchies. Rank-Ordering Model of Eval (ROE) proposed by Coetzee (2006) is applied to phonological variation with regard to nasal place assimilation in Korean and English. In ROE, Eval assigns a harmonic rank-ordering to the whole candidate set, and two or more candidates are possible as variants. This model presents an analysis of variation without radically different subgrammars/outputs or various subhierarchies. In order to account for phonological variation regarding nasal place assimilation, we use constraints ID-IO(Onset), *[n[+labial]]Wd, Max ([+velar]), [...V_(str)N(αP)+C(αP)...], ID-IO(Coda), and Agree(Place) and a single ranking hierarchy. This analysis needs further research with regard to the frequency of variants depending on speech styles in the future.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Baković,E, "A revised typology of opaque generalizations", Phonology, (24), pp.217~259 (2007)
  2. Borowsky,T, "Topics in the lexical phonology of English", 박사, pp.1986
  3. Cho, Y.-M. Y, "Korean phonology in the late twentieth century", Language Research, (33), pp.687~735 (1997)
  4. Coetzee,A.W, "Variation as accessing ‘non-optimal’ candidates", Phonology, (23), pp.337~385 (2006)
  5. Ford, A, "On the status of morphophonology, In CLS 19: Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax", pp.63~78 (1983), Chicago Linguistic Society
  6. Hooper, J. B, "An introduction to natural generative phonology" (1976), Academic Press
  7. Inkelas, S, "Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish", Language, (71), pp.763~793 (1995)
  8. Itô, J, "The core-periphery structure of the lexicon and constraints on reranking, In Papers in Optimality Theory, UMOP", pp.181~210 (1995), GLSA
  9. Kager,R, "Optimality Theory" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  10. Kang,S.-K, "An Optimality theoretic account of nasal assimilation in English", Language, Information and Computation, (11), pp.479~488 (1996)
  11. Kim,Y.-S, "Reconsidering optionality within Optimality Theory", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 25(2), pp.315~329 (2000)
  12. Kim-Renaud, Y.-K, "Korean consonantal phonology", 박사, pp.1974
  13. Labov,W, "Methodology, In A survey of linguistic science", pp.412~497 (1971), Linguistics Program, University of Maryland
  14. Lamontagne, G, "A correspondence account of coalescence", Ms. University of Toronto (1995)
  15. Lee,S.-S, "A constraint-based account of English and Korean place assimilation", Journal of Studies in Language, 13(1), pp.79~93 (1997)
  16. Lombardi,L, "Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 17(2), pp.267~302 (1999)
  17. McCarthy, J. J, "Overview of prosodic morphology. Part II: Template Satisfaction", Talk presented at Utrecht, ~ (1994)
  18. Nagy, N, "Optimality Theory and variable word-final deletion in Faetar", Language Variation and Change, (9), pp.37~55 (1997)
  19. Padgett,J, "Stricture and nasal place assimilation", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, (12), pp.465~513 (1994)
  20. 박인규, "Production of Stop-Nasal Sequences by Korean Learners of English: An Optimality Theoretic Approach", 어학연구, 42(1), pp.1~18 (2006), 언어교육원
  21. Prince, A, "Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar", 석사, pp.1993

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)