본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

CISG상 매수인 구제수단의 요건과 효과에 관한 연구

A Study on the Legal Effects and Cases of Remedies for Breach of Contract by the Seller under CISG

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Regarding to the remedies for breach of contract by the seller (arts. 45-52), these provisions in CISG address various aspects of the remedies available to a buyer that has suffered a breach of contract by the seller: they catalogue those remedies and authorize their use art. 45(1); they define their availability and operation(arts. 45(2)(3), 46, 48, 50); they provide for an aggrieved buyer’s right to avoid the contract (arts. 47, 49), thereby regulating the buyer’s choice between alternative sets of remedies; and they define the operation of the buyer’s remedies in certain special circumstances(arts. 51-52). In order to, art. 45 gives an overview of the remedies available to the buyer when the seller has committed a breach by non-performance of any of its duties under the contract or the CISG. Art. 46 gives the buyer a general right to require the seller to perform its contractual obligations in kind. Art. 47 gives the buyer the right to fix an additional period of time, beyond that provided for in the contract, within which the seller must perform its obligations. Art. 48 gives the seller the so-called right to cure, which allows the seller to correct any failure to perform its obligations under the contract or under the CISG. Art. 49 specifies the conditions under which the buyer is entitled to declare the contract avoided. Art. 50 provides for the remedy of price reduction when the seller has delivered goods that do not conform with the contract. Art. 51 deals with partial non-delivery and delivery of partially non-conforming goods. Finally, Even where the seller does more than is required by the contract there is an issue of non-performance. Art. 52 addresses two such situations, namely, if the seller delivers goods too early or delivers too many goods.

Abstract

Regarding to the remedies for breach of contract by the seller (arts. 45-52), these provisions in CISG address various aspects of the remedies available to a buyer that has suffered a breach of contract by the seller: they catalogue those remedies and authorize their use art. 45(1); they define their availability and operation(arts. 45(2)(3), 46, 48, 50); they provide for an aggrieved buyer’s right to avoid the contract (arts. 47, 49), thereby regulating the buyer’s choice between alternative sets of remedies; and they define the operation of the buyer’s remedies in certain special circumstances(arts. 51-52). In order to, art. 45 gives an overview of the remedies available to the buyer when the seller has committed a breach by non-performance of any of its duties under the contract or the CISG. Art. 46 gives the buyer a general right to require the seller to perform its contractual obligations in kind. Art. 47 gives the buyer the right to fix an additional period of time, beyond that provided for in the contract, within which the seller must perform its obligations. Art. 48 gives the seller the so-called right to cure, which allows the seller to correct any failure to perform its obligations under the contract or under the CISG. Art. 49 specifies the conditions under which the buyer is entitled to declare the contract avoided. Art. 50 provides for the remedy of price reduction when the seller has delivered goods that do not conform with the contract. Art. 51 deals with partial non-delivery and delivery of partially non-conforming goods. Finally, Even where the seller does more than is required by the contract there is an issue of non-performance. Art. 52 addresses two such situations, namely, if the seller delivers goods too early or delivers too many goods.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 석광현, "국제물품매매계약의 법리" (2010), 박영사
  2. 심종석, "신체계 국제운송론, 제2판" (2010), 두남출판
  3. Bruno Zeller, "Damages under the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 2nd ed" (2009), Oxford Univ. Press
  4. Christopher Kee, "Remedies for breach of contract where only part of the contract has been performed: Comparison between provisions of CISG (Articles 51, 73) and counterpart provisions of the Principles of European Contract Law", Pace Law, Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law (2002)
  5. Erika Sondahl, "Understanding the Remedy of Price Reduction - A Means to Fostering a More Uniform Application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods", Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration, 7 (2003)
  6. Harry M. Flechtner, "Drafting Contracts under the CISG" (2008), Oxford Univ. Press
  7. Ingeborg Schwenzer, "International Sales Law" (2007), Cavendish Publishing
  8. Joseph Lookofsky, "Understanding the CISG, 3rd ed" (2008), Wolters Kluwer
  9. Peter Huber, "The CISG" (2007), European Law Publishers
  10. Peter Schlechtriem, "Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods, 2nd ed" (1998), Oxford Univ. Press
  11. Peter Schlechtriem, "Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods, 3rd ed" (2005), Oxford Univ. Press
  12. UNCITRAL, "Digest of Case Law on the UN Convention on the Internatioanl Sale of Goods", United Nations Publication, pp.9~11 (2008)
  13. "Amtsgericht München’(Germany), Unknown", ~ (1995)
  14. "Arbitral Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce’(Sweden), Unknow", ~ (2007)
  15. "Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona’(Spain), JUR 2002\114334", ~ (2002)
  16. "Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona’(Spain), Unknown", ~ (1997)
  17. "Bundesgerichtshof’(Germany), VIII ZR 300", 96, 1997
  18. "Corte di Appello di Milano’(Italy), 790", ~ (1998)
  19. "Cour d'Appel de Versailles, 12ème chambre, 1ère section’(France), 56", ~ (1998)
  20. "Cour d'Appel de Grenoble, Chambre Commerciale’(France), RG 93", 4879, 1995
  21. "Court of Appeal of Eastern Finland’(Finland), S 96", 605, 1997
  22. "Hof van Beroep, Antwerpen’(Belgium), 2002", AR, pp.2006, ~
  23. "Juzgado de Primer Instancia, n. 3 de Badalona’(Spain), Unknown", ~ (2006)
  24. "Landgericht Braunschweig’(Germany), 21 O 703", 01, 2001
  25. "Landgericht Oldenburg’(Germany), 12 O 674", 93, 1994
  26. "Oberlandesgericht Hamburg’(Germany), 18 U 38", 22, 2002
  27. "Oberlandesgericht Koblenz’(Germany), 1U 486", 07, 2007
  28. "Oberlandesgericht Koblenz’(Germany), 2 U 31", 96, 1997
  29. "Oberlandesgericht Rostock’(Germany), 6 U 126", 00, 2002
  30. "Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart’(Germany), 6 U 220", 07, 2008
  31. "Oberster Gerichtshof’(Austria), 7 Ob 301", 01t, 2002
  32. "Oberster Gerichtshof’(Austria), 8 Ob 22", 00v, 2000
  33. "Ontario Superior Court of Justice’(Canada), 98-CV-142493CM", ~ (1999)
  34. "Pretura di Locarno Campagna’(Switzerland), 6252", ~ (1992)
  35. "Tribunal of Int'l Commercial Arbitration at the Russian Federation Chamber of Commerce and Industry’(Russia), 102", 2005, 2006
  36. "U.S. Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)’(USA), Nos.06-3390, 06-3525", ~ (2007)
  37. "U.S. District Court, E.D., Louisiana’(USA), Civ. A. 90-0380", ~ (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)