유엔국제물품매매협약에서 물품의 계약부적합에 대한 구제수단
Non-Conformity of Goods and Remedies in CISG
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The CISG provides the right to require performance concerning non-conformity of goods. At this time, the decision whether the product is suitable for the contract or not is made according to the Agreement provision No.35; Firstly, whether the seller delivered the product that its quantity, quality and description match the requirements of the contract. Secondly, by the suitability of the ordinary purpose, particular purpose or sample and models. If the seller provides the unsuitable products and that can be the fundamental breach, the purchaser can avod the contract. And the seller also reduce the price due to the unsuitable products. Especially when the seller’s delivery of non-conforming goods is not a fundamental breach, - namely insignificant non-conformity, the right to require to repair is a major remedy. If the goods do not conform with the contract and the failure constitutes a fundamental breach of contract, the buyer may require delivery of substitute goods (Art. 46 (2) CISG). On the other hand, if non-conformity constitutes an insignificant breach of contract, the buyer may require the seller to remedy the lack of conformity by repair (Art. 46 (3) CISG). Also Seller has right to avoidance(Art. 48 CISG), reduction in price(Art. 50 CISG), and compensation for damage(Art. 74-77 CISG). These CISG Regulation of non-conformity of goods cases give many implications for Korea, because of seller's right to cure is not exsited, criteria for non-conformity of goods is not regulated, and reduction in price is not provided in Korea Civil Code.
Abstract
The CISG provides the right to require performance concerning non-conformity of goods. At this time, the decision whether the product is suitable for the contract or not is made according to the Agreement provision No.35; Firstly, whether the seller delivered the product that its quantity, quality and description match the requirements of the contract. Secondly, by the suitability of the ordinary purpose, particular purpose or sample and models. If the seller provides the unsuitable products and that can be the fundamental breach, the purchaser can avod the contract. And the seller also reduce the price due to the unsuitable products. Especially when the seller’s delivery of non-conforming goods is not a fundamental breach, - namely insignificant non-conformity, the right to require to repair is a major remedy. If the goods do not conform with the contract and the failure constitutes a fundamental breach of contract, the buyer may require delivery of substitute goods (Art. 46 (2) CISG). On the other hand, if non-conformity constitutes an insignificant breach of contract, the buyer may require the seller to remedy the lack of conformity by repair (Art. 46 (3) CISG). Also Seller has right to avoidance(Art. 48 CISG), reduction in price(Art. 50 CISG), and compensation for damage(Art. 74-77 CISG). These CISG Regulation of non-conformity of goods cases give many implications for Korea, because of seller's right to cure is not exsited, criteria for non-conformity of goods is not regulated, and reduction in price is not provided in Korea Civil Code.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김봉수, "물건하자에 대한 매수인의 추완청구권", 박사, pp.2009
- 김진우, "매도인의 재이행권 －국제물품매매계약에 관한 UN협약(CISG)을 중심으로－", 인권과 정의, (390), pp.22~43 (2009), 대한변호사협회
- 사동천, "“유엔국제물품매매법(CISG)상 구제수단간의 우열” - PICC, PECL, 기타 몇몇 국내법과의 비교를 겸하여 -", 국제거래법연구, (13) (2005), 국제거래법학회
- 오원석, "國際物品賣買契約에서 買受人의 物品檢査時期", 무역상무연구, 20, pp.3~82 (2003), 한국무역상무학회
- 오원석, "국제물품매매거래에서 매도인의 계약적합성물품 인도의무에 관한 비교연구", 무역상무연구, 37, pp.3~33 (2008), 한국무역상무학회
- 이우영, "국제물품매매계약에서 물품의 계약적합성에 관한 비교연구 - CISG와 UCC를 중심으로 -", 국제상학, 24(3), pp.35~55 (2009), 한국국제상학회
- 존 오, "UN통일매매법" (2004), 삼영사
- 최준선, "매도인의 제2의 이행제공권", 재산법연구, 9(1) (1992), 한국재산법학회
- 최흥섭, "유엔국제매매법" (1997), 인하대학교 출판부
- Bamberger, Heinz-Georg, "Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, 4. Aufl." (2007), C.H. Beck
- Bianca, Cesare, "Commentary on the International Sales Law, the 1980 Vienna Sales Convention" (1987), Giuffrè
- Bitter, Georgr, "Nacherfüllungsrecht und Nacherfüllungspflicht des Verkäufers im neuen Schuldrecht", pp.13~ (2001), UN-Kaufrecht, Art.
- Hartkamp, A. S., "The UNIDROIT Principles for International Commercial Contracts and the Principles for European Contract Law", ERPL, 2, pp.341~
- Honnold, John O., "Uniform Law For International Sales, Third Edition" (1999), Kluwer Law International
- Honsell, Heinrich, "Kommentrar zum UN-Kaufrecht" (1996), Springer Verlag
- Krebs, Markus, "Die Rückabwicklung im UN-Kaufrecht(Diss. München 1999), C.H. Beck, 2000Lando, Ole, Principles of European Contract Law, in: Liber Memoralis Francois Laurent 1810-1887", pp.555~ (1989), Codification of the Law
- Lando, Ole, "Principles of European Contract Law Part I And II" (2000), Kluwer Law International
- Magnus, Ulrich, "UN-Kaufrecht, ZEuP 1995, 202 ff.MünchHGB", Benicke, Art. 46 Rn. 20
- Piltz, Burghard, "Internationales Kaufrecht" (1993), C.H. Beck
- Posch, Willibald, "Das einheitliche Wiener Kaufrecht" (1992), Neues Recht für den interantionalen Warenkauf, wirtschaftsvertrag Dr. Anton Orac
- Rebmann, Kurt, "Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Band 3 Schuldrecht Besonderer Teil", pp.433~610 (2004), CISG, C.H. Beck
- Schrechtriem, Peter, "Kommentar zum einheitlichen UN-Kaufrecht, 3. Auflage" (2000), C.H. Beck
- Schrechtriem, Peter, "Ingeborg, Kommentar zum einheitlichen UN-Kaufrecht, 4. Aufl" (2004), C.H.Beck
- Schmidt, Karsten, "Münchener Kommentar zum Handelsgesetzbuch, Band 6", pp.373~406 (2004), CISG, C.H. Beck
- Secretariat Commentary, "Commentary on the Draft Convention for the International Sale of Goods, prepared by the Secretariat", ~
- Staudinger, Julius von, "Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen" (1999), Wiener UN-Kaufrecht
- Unidroit, "Principles of International Commercial Contracts" (2004)
- Witz, Woflgang, "International Einheitliches Kaufrecht, Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft" (2000), Heidelberg