CISG상의 대체물인도청구권에 관한 고찰
A Study on the Right to Require Delivery of Substitute Goods under CISG
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the buyer’s right to require delivery of substitute goods under the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). Because CISG provides that a buyer should fulfill some requirements in order to exercise his right to require delivery of substitute goods, and that such right cannot be revoked once exercised, it involves important issues about the effect and liability. As CISG has some provisional loopholes with regard to the right to require delivery of substitute goods, it needs interpretation and supplement in the dispute resolution process. Therefore, this paper attempts to accurately interpret these loopholes related with the right to require delivery of substitute goods. The delivery of substitute goods should be allowed within the very strictly limited scope because it takes a considerable time and expenses for the seller. Moreover, a request for substitute goods should be understood not to avoid a contract but as a remedy for breach maintaining the contract. This paper deeply discusses what extent of the lack of conformity constituted a fundamental breach of contract and whether article 28 of CISG can be applied to a request for substitute goods. It further examines relationship with seller’s right to cure, the right to require to remedy the lack of conformity by repairing and requiring a fundamental breach of contract. It also analyses following contents: a possibility of exercising the right to require delivery of substitute goods when goods or right do not conform with the contract; problems of article 81 through article 84 which are equally treated with the effect of avoidance of contract; the possibility of making restitution of the goods, liability of small modification of the goods being restituted before/after exercising the right to require delivery of substitute goods; place and expense of restitution. In conclusion, it seems that a buyer prefers the cancelation of contract to the right to require delivery of substitute goods remedy for the lack of conformity with the contract. It means when the goods delivered are not in conformity with the contract in the international sale of goods, a buyer ends the contract through the avoidance of contract rather than keeps the contract through exercising the right to require delivery of substitute goods.
Abstract
This paper examines the buyer’s right to require delivery of substitute goods under the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). Because CISG provides that a buyer should fulfill some requirements in order to exercise his right to require delivery of substitute goods, and that such right cannot be revoked once exercised, it involves important issues about the effect and liability. As CISG has some provisional loopholes with regard to the right to require delivery of substitute goods, it needs interpretation and supplement in the dispute resolution process. Therefore, this paper attempts to accurately interpret these loopholes related with the right to require delivery of substitute goods. The delivery of substitute goods should be allowed within the very strictly limited scope because it takes a considerable time and expenses for the seller. Moreover, a request for substitute goods should be understood not to avoid a contract but as a remedy for breach maintaining the contract. This paper deeply discusses what extent of the lack of conformity constituted a fundamental breach of contract and whether article 28 of CISG can be applied to a request for substitute goods. It further examines relationship with seller’s right to cure, the right to require to remedy the lack of conformity by repairing and requiring a fundamental breach of contract. It also analyses following contents: a possibility of exercising the right to require delivery of substitute goods when goods or right do not conform with the contract; problems of article 81 through article 84 which are equally treated with the effect of avoidance of contract; the possibility of making restitution of the goods, liability of small modification of the goods being restituted before/after exercising the right to require delivery of substitute goods; place and expense of restitution. In conclusion, it seems that a buyer prefers the cancelation of contract to the right to require delivery of substitute goods remedy for the lack of conformity with the contract. It means when the goods delivered are not in conformity with the contract in the international sale of goods, a buyer ends the contract through the avoidance of contract rather than keeps the contract through exercising the right to require delivery of substitute goods.
참고문헌 (43)
- 김인호, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약 사례연구 II" (2006), 법무부
- 김용의, "CISG를 적용한 최근 미국 판례에 관한 연구", 국제거래법연구, 20(1), pp.137~164 (2011), 국제거래법학회
- 박영복, "CISG상의 계약책임 구조에 대한 비교법적 분석", 국제거래법연구, 14(2), pp.23~58 (2005), 국제거래법학회
- 사동천, "매수인의 물품부적합통지의무에 관한 비교법적 고찰 - CISG를 중심으로 -", 국제거래법연구, 16(2), pp.263~288 (2007), 국제거래법학회
- 사동천, "국제물품매매법(CISG)상 구제수단간의 우열-PICC, PECL, 기타 몇몇 국내법과의 비교를 겸하여－", 국제거래법연구, 13, pp.25~50 (2004), 국제거래법학회
- 석광현, "국제물품매매협약(CISG)을 적용한 우리 판결의 소개와 검토", 국제거래법연구, 20(1), pp.87~135 (2011), 국제거래법학회
- 석광현, "국제물품매매계약의 법리" (2010), 박영사
- 송양호, "CISG에 따른 청산의무의 이행장소", 국제거래법연구, 18(2), pp.25~45 (2009), 국제거래법학회
- 송양호, "CISG에 따른 계약해제와 반환청산", 국제거래법연구, 12, pp.51~92 (2004), 국제거래법학회
- 송양호, "유럽계약법원칙과 한국법", 상사법연구, 8, pp.135~182 (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 최준선, "로스쿨 국제거래법－이론과 사례－" (2011), 박영사
- 최준선, "국제거래법 제6판" (2008), 삼영사
- 최흥섭, "유엔國際賣買法(CISG)에서 本質的 契約違反", 국제거래법연구, 16(2), pp.241~262 (2007), 국제거래법학회
- 최흥섭, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약 해설" (2005), 법무부
- 허해관, "국제물품매매협약상 계약해제의 효과", 국제거래법연구, 20(1), pp.61~85 (2011), 국제거래법학회
- Bianca, "Commentary on the International Sales Law. The 1980 Vienna Sales Convention, Giuffre" (1987)
- Botzenhardt, "Die Auslegung des Begriffs der wesentlichen Vertragsverletzung im UN-Kaufrecht" (1998), Lang
- V. Caemmerer, "Kommentar zum Einheitlichen UN-Kaufrecht-CISG-, 2. Aufl" (1995), C.H.Beck
- Enderlein, "Internationales Kaufrecht" (1991), Haufe
- Heilmann, "Mangelgewahrleistung im UN-Kaufrecht" (1994), Duncker & Humbolt
- Herber, "Internationales Kaufrecht" (1991), C.H.Beck
- Holthausen, "Die wesentliche Vertragsverletzung des Verkaufers nach Art. 25 UN-Kaufrecht", pp.101~107 (1990), RIW
- Honnold, "Uniform Law for International Sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention" (1999), Kluwer Law International
- Honsel, "Kommentar zum UN-Kaufrecht" (1997), Springer
- Huber, "UNCITRAL-Entwurf eines Ubereinkommens fur internationale Warenkaufvertrage", RabelsZ, 43, pp.413~526 (1979)
- Lando, "Principles of European Contract Law-Parts I and II", Kluwer Law International (2000)
- Leser, "Vertragsaufhebung und Ruckabwicklung unter dem UN-Kaufrecht, in: Perter Schlechtriem, In Einheitliches Kaufrecht und Obligationenrecht", pp.225~256 (1987), Nomos
- Loewe, "Internationales Kaufrecht" (1989), Manz
- Magnus, "Probleme der Vertragsaufhebung nach dem UN-Kaufrecht", pp.870~872 (1995), JuS
- Piltz, "Internationales Kaufrecht" (1993), C. H. Beck
- Rabel, "Der Entwurf eines einheitlichen Kaufgesetzes", RabelsZ, 9, pp.522~612 (1935)
- Rabel, "Das Recht des Warenkaufs I" (1957), de Gruyter
- Schlechtriem, "Internationales UN-Kaufrecht, 4. Aufl" (2007), Mohr Siebeck
- Schlechtriem, "Kommentar zum Einheitlichen UN-Kaufrecht, 4. Aufl" (2004), C.H.Beck
- Schlechtriem, "From the Hague to Vienna-Progress in Unification of the Law of International Sales Contracts?", The Transnational Law of International Commercial Transactions, 2, pp.125~135 (1982), Studies in Transnational Economic Law
- Schlechtriem, "Einheitliches UN-Kaufrecht" (1981), J. C. B. Mohr
- Song, Yang-Ho, "Vertragsaufhebung und Ruckabwicklung nach deutschem und koranischem Recht und internationalem Einheitskaufrecht" (1999), Lang
- Staudinger, "Kommentar zum Burgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einfuhrungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen, Wiener UN-Kaufrecht(CISG), 12Aufl" (2005), de Gruyter
- UNCITRAL YB V, "YB VII", United Nations Publication, ~ (1976)
- UNIDROIT, "Principles of International Commercial Contracts" (1994), Unidroit
- Weber, "Vertragsverletzungsfolgen, Schadensersatz, Ru.ckabwicklung, vertragliche Gestaltungsmo.glichkeiten", Lausanner Kolloquium 1984, pp.165~210 (1985)
- Witz, "International Einheitliches Kaufrecht" (2000), Recht und Wirtschaft
- Ziegler, "Leistungsstorungsrecht nach dem UN-Kaufrecht" (1995), Nomos