생명윤리적인 관점에서 본 디자이너 베이비
Designer Baby from a Bioethical Perspective
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article is to study that biotechnologists may create designer babies with the development of biotechnology in the future and to analyze the relationship between creation of life and bioethics. The term ‘designer baby’ first appeared in 2004. The term was not defined on a scientific basis, but was coined by a journalist. A designer baby is a human embryo which has been genetically modified, usually following guidelines set by the parent or scientist, to produce desirable traits. This technology of genetic editing is the subject of ethical debate, bringing up the concept of genetically modified ‘superbabies’ to interbreed with and eventually replace modern humans. No matter how well scientists conduct their research with good intentions, they should stop it themselves if their work can lead to destruction of the natural order. Man wants to live a long life without a disease. But manmade technology should not break the order of society. In order to concentrate on research on biotechnology that can cure incurable diseases and serious diseases without violating bioethics, laws, institutions and ethical frameworks should be created to make an environment for stable research.
Abstract
This article is to study that biotechnologists may create designer babies with the development of biotechnology in the future and to analyze the relationship between creation of life and bioethics. The term ‘designer baby’ first appeared in 2004. The term was not defined on a scientific basis, but was coined by a journalist. A designer baby is a human embryo which has been genetically modified, usually following guidelines set by the parent or scientist, to produce desirable traits. This technology of genetic editing is the subject of ethical debate, bringing up the concept of genetically modified ‘superbabies’ to interbreed with and eventually replace modern humans. No matter how well scientists conduct their research with good intentions, they should stop it themselves if their work can lead to destruction of the natural order. Man wants to live a long life without a disease. But manmade technology should not break the order of society. In order to concentrate on research on biotechnology that can cure incurable diseases and serious diseases without violating bioethics, laws, institutions and ethical frameworks should be created to make an environment for stable research.
참고문헌 (23)
- 황순우, "생명공학과 폭력-인간 유전자 문화의 폭력성과 생명 윤리의 정당화에 대한 비판적 고찰", 가톨릭철학, (7), pp.232~259 (2005), 한국가톨릭철학회
- 진교훈, "생명공학의 발전과 생명윤리", 환경과 생명, 9, pp.39~52 (2002)
- 김호연, "우생학연구단편", 생물학연구정보센터 Biowave, 8, pp.1~11 (2006)
- 뇌플러, 폴, "GMO 사피엔스의 시대 —맞춤아기, 복제인간, 유전자변형기술이 가져올 가까운 미래", pp.2016~ (2016), 반니
- Ledford, Heidi, "CRISPR concerns-UK bioethics panel eyes the implications of gene editing", Nature, 538, pp.17~ (2016)
- 이복기, "“이런 일이 일어나는 방식은 신이나 알겠지”: 이시구로의 『나를 보내지 마』에 나타난 이야기", 영어영문학연구, 45(1), pp.149~165 (2019), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]
- Lustig, Andrew, "The Lessons of Frankenstein", Commonweal, 131(14), pp.8~9 (2004)[DOI]
- Marcus, Steven, "Frankenstein: myths of scientific and medical knowledge and stories of human relations", Southern Review, 38(1), pp.188~201 (2002)
- 박보야나, "영화 가타카(Gattaca)가 현실로! 맞춤형 아기 시대의 도래", Future Horizon, 25, pp.2~ (2015)
- Shelley, Mary, "Frankenstein" (2007), Pearson Longman
- 신승환, "인간 생명을 다루는 생명과학의 범위와 윤리적 쟁점", 가톨릭 신학과사상, 41, pp.7~39 (2002)