본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

집행임원의 책임에 관한 회사법적 검토

A Review on the Liability of Executive Officer in the Korean Commercial Code.

김홍식
한국경영법률학회 (The Korean Academic Society Of Business Administration And Law)|2013.10|경영법률 (Journal of Business Administration & Law)|제24권 제1호|pp. 129-159

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

이사회(Board of Directors)회사지배구조(Corporate Governance)집행임원(Executive Officer)집행임원의 책임(Liability of Executive Officer)이사(Director)
주제분류법학

초록

On April 11th 2011, the revision of the Commercial Code was passed in the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea. Among the various articles which were codified in the revision of the Commercial Code, articles related with executive officer was introduced to the Korean Commercial Code. In the article 408-8, liability of executive officer was defined like below ;(1) In cases where an executive officer has acted intentionally or with gross negligence in violation of any Act or subordinate statute or of the articles of corporation or has neglected to perform his/her duties, he/she shall be liable for damage against the company with executive officers. (2) in cases where an executive officer has neglected to perform his/her duties intentionally or with gross negligence, he/she shall be liable for damage against a third party, if any. (3) In cases where an executive officer ia liable for damage against the company with executive officers or a third party, if other executive officer, director or auditor is also responsible therefor, the executive officer shall be jointly and severally liable for damage with such other executive officer, director or auditor Executive officer have to be liable to the corporation and third party for some cases described in 408-8. In this paper many problems such as jointly and severally liability for corporation and third party in some cases, limitation of liability for executive officer and applying business judgment rule to executive officer were reviewed. Complementary points in terms of interpretation and legislation of Commercial Code are needed to operate executive officer system in framework of Commercial Code functionally. If Complementary points are met requirement, executive officer system should help develop corporate governance.

Abstract

On April 11th 2011, the revision of the Commercial Code was passed in the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea. Among the various articles which were codified in the revision of the Commercial Code, articles related with executive officer was introduced to the Korean Commercial Code. In the article 408-8, liability of executive officer was defined like below ;(1) In cases where an executive officer has acted intentionally or with gross negligence in violation of any Act or subordinate statute or of the articles of corporation or has neglected to perform his/her duties, he/she shall be liable for damage against the company with executive officers. (2) in cases where an executive officer has neglected to perform his/her duties intentionally or with gross negligence, he/she shall be liable for damage against a third party, if any. (3) In cases where an executive officer ia liable for damage against the company with executive officers or a third party, if other executive officer, director or auditor is also responsible therefor, the executive officer shall be jointly and severally liable for damage with such other executive officer, director or auditor Executive officer have to be liable to the corporation and third party for some cases described in 408-8. In this paper many problems such as jointly and severally liability for corporation and third party in some cases, limitation of liability for executive officer and applying business judgment rule to executive officer were reviewed. Complementary points in terms of interpretation and legislation of Commercial Code are needed to operate executive officer system in framework of Commercial Code functionally. If Complementary points are met requirement, executive officer system should help develop corporate governance.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 권재열, "대법원 판례상 경영판단의 원칙에 관한 소고", 증권법연구, 9(1), pp.239~262 (2008), 한국증권법학회
  2. 권종호, "2011년 개정상법상의집행임원제도의 의의와 과제", 증권법연구, 12(2), pp.1~34 (2011), 한국증권법학회
  3. 김병기, "執行任員의 責任과 制限에 관한 硏究", 기업법연구, 23(1), pp.191~212 (2009), 한국기업법학회
  4. 김병연, "상법상 이사의 책임제한에 대한 연구", 비교사법, 15(1), pp.237~268 (2008), 한국비교사법학회
  5. 김병연, "한국 상법상 이사의 의무와 책임추궁", 상사법연구, 28(1), pp.93~130 (2009), 한국상사법학회
  6. 김차동, "이사의 책임제한의 근거 및 논리구조", 법학논총, 24(2) (2007), 법학연구소
  7. 김태진, "개정 상법하의 집행임원제 운용을 위한 법적 검토", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.295~384 (2011), 한국상사법학회
  8. 김홍식, "M&A 개론" (2009), 博英社
  9. 남유선, "개정상법 및 시행령상 기업지배구조변화에 관한 연구", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.47~78 (2012), 한국기업법학회
  10. 송양호, "집행임원의 책임완화에 대한 고찰", 법학연구, 통권 : 29 (2009)
  11. 송종준, "경영판단의 원칙과 그 수용상의 한계", 인권과 정의, (364) (2006)
  12. 심영, "개정 상법상 이사의 의무와 책임에 관한 소고", 경영법률, 21(4), pp.215~248 (2011), 한국경영법률학회
  13. 심재한, "상법개정안에서의 회사지배구조와 집행임원제도", 한림법학 FORUM, 19 (2008)
  14. 양동석, "일본 상법상 이사의 책임제한과 분할책임론", 기업법연구, 14, pp.9~37 (2003), 한국기업법학회
  15. 양동석, "집행임원의 역할과 법적지위", 상장협 추계호, (48) (2003)
  16. 양동석, "2011년 개정상법상의 이사의 의무와 손해배상책임", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.221~245 (2012), 한국기업법학회
  17. 양만식, "집행임원제도의 도입에 따른 지배구조론의 전개", 상사법연구, 24(1), pp.177~231 (2005), 한국상사법학회
  18. 원동욱, "執行任員制度의 導入方案", 경영법률, 16(2), pp.343~400 (2006), 한국경영법률학회
  19. 원동욱, "企業支配構造關聯 商法改正案의 主要內容 및 向後課題", 법학논총, 32(1), pp.217~255 (2008), 법학연구소
  20. 임중호, "代表理事와 代表執行任員의 法的 地位 比較 - 業務執行의 意思決定權과 執行權의 所在를 중심으로 -", 중앙법학, 10(1), pp.271~307 (2008), 중앙법학회
  21. 정준우, "2011년 개정상법상 집행임원의 법적 지위에 관한 비판적 검토", 한양법학, (35), pp.449~482 (2011), 한양법학회
  22. 정쾌영, "執行任員制度에 관한 商法 改正案의 問題點 檢討", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.270~296 (2007), 한국기업법학회
  23. 정찬형, "한국 주식회사에서의 집행임원에 대한 연구", 고려법학, (43) (2004)
  24. 정찬형, "기업지배구조 상법 개정 제2차 공청회 자료집", 법무부, ~ (2013)
  25. 최문희, "이사의 손해배상책임의 제한" (2007), 서울대학교 법학연구소
  26. 최병규, "경영판단원칙과 그의 수용 방안- 최근 독일의 입법 내용을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 19(2), pp.107~128 (2005), 한국기업법학회
  27. 홍복기, "주식회사에 있어서 집행임원제도의 도입과 그 과제", 상사판례연구, 19(4), pp.89~120 (2006), 한국상사판례학회
  28. 황근수, "한국에 있어서 집행임원제도의 현황과 향후의 운용방향", 서울대학교 법학, 49(2), pp.133~163 (2008), 법학연구소
  29. 황근수, "최근 株式會社 執行任員制度의 導入과 運用方向", 기업법연구, 22(2), pp.125~167 (2008), 한국기업법학회
  30. 황근수, "美國과 日本의 株式會社 執行任員制度에 관한 考察", 법학연구, (31), pp.287~313 (2008), 한국법학회
  31. Aaron D. Jones, "Corporate Officer Wrongdoing and the Fiduciary Duties of Corporate Officers under Delaware Law", Am. Bus. L. J, 44, pp.475~ (2007)
  32. A. Gilchrist Sparks, "Common Law Duties of Non-Director Corporate Officer", Bus. Law, 48, pp.215~ (1992)
  33. Charles R. O'Kelly, "Corporation and other business associations; Selected statutes, Rules, and Forms" (1999), Aspen
  34. Lawrence A. Hamermesh, "Corporate Officers and the Business Judgment Rule : A Reply to Professor Johnson", Bus. Law, 60, pp.865~ (2005)
  35. Lyman P.Q. Johnson, "Recalling Why Corporate Officers are Fiduciaries", Wm.& Mary L. Rev, 46, pp.1597~ (2005)
  36. Lyman P.Q. Johnson, "Corporate Officers and the Business Judgment Rule", Bus. Law, 60, pp.439~ (2005)
  37. William A. Klein, "Business Associations 2012 Statutes and Rules" (2012), Foundation Press
  38. 유가증권시장상장법인 경영인 현황, "한국상장회사협의회", ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

개정 상법하의 집행임원제 운용을 위한 법적 검토김태진한국상사법학회 · 상사법연구2011 · 제30권 제2호집행임원제도 입법안에 대한 재검토송호신한국법정책학회 · 법과정책연구2008 · 제8권 제1호한국에 있어서 집행임원제도의 현황과 향후의 운용방향황근수법학연구소 · 서울대학교 법학2008 · 제49권 제2호집행임원제도에 관한 재조명 -2008년 상법개정안을 중심으로-최완진한국상사법학회 · 상사법연구2010 · 제29권 제3호執行任員의 責任緩和에 관한 硏究김병기법학연구소 · 원광법학2009 · 제25권 제1호Director’s Liabilities and Obligations in Korea최승재은행법학회 · 은행법연구2014 · 제7권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)

이익공여금지규정을 둘러싼 제 문제－ 최근 일본에서의 논의를 중심으로 －이효경pp. 1-28「기업지배구조 상법개정안」에 관한 종합적 검토최완진pp. 29-63기관투자자로서 연기금의 주주권 행사에 대한 법적 고찰장우영pp. 65-96CEO Duality － 이사회의장과 대표집행임원의 겸직문제 －김정호pp. 97-128회사기회유용의 법리와 상법 제397조의2현인섭pp. 161-188
원문 보기