본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

집행임원제도 입법안에 대한 재검토

A Reappraisal of the Revised Bill of Korean Commercial Act on the Adoption of Executive Officer System

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The executive officer carry out the management of corporate business which authorized from the general meeting of stockholders or the board of directors. And sometimes, he will decide on a corporate mind to the business affairs. But it is not the organization stipulated by law but the practical business world. The Ministry of Justice, Republic of Korea, prepared the bill of amended Korean Commercial Act, partly revised Company Law on the Structure of Corporate Governance. It is a main content that make enact on the Executive Officer System. It was proclaimed on it by the several scholars, lawyers, an expert on the economy, a man of business and so on. So the bill was presented the National Assembly in 2006. But in this Article, in my opinion, opposed to the bill. the executive officer system is sufficient to use in the economic and business world. It is not necessary to the legislation. In point of fact, the establishment of the executive officer is free, in the scope of the corporate business law. Instead of, previously, legislated in 1999, the effective operation of a outside director or a audit committee is of great use.

Abstract

The executive officer carry out the management of corporate business which authorized from the general meeting of stockholders or the board of directors. And sometimes, he will decide on a corporate mind to the business affairs. But it is not the organization stipulated by law but the practical business world. The Ministry of Justice, Republic of Korea, prepared the bill of amended Korean Commercial Act, partly revised Company Law on the Structure of Corporate Governance. It is a main content that make enact on the Executive Officer System. It was proclaimed on it by the several scholars, lawyers, an expert on the economy, a man of business and so on. So the bill was presented the National Assembly in 2006. But in this Article, in my opinion, opposed to the bill. the executive officer system is sufficient to use in the economic and business world. It is not necessary to the legislation. In point of fact, the establishment of the executive officer is free, in the scope of the corporate business law. Instead of, previously, legislated in 1999, the effective operation of a outside director or a audit committee is of great use.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 강희갑, "미국법상의 집행임원제도의 도입에 관한 연구", 比較私法, 7(13) (2000)
  2. 權純姬, "美國과 獨逸의 企業支配構造와 最近動向에 관한 硏究", 商事法硏究, 21(4) (2003)
  3. 백정웅, "사베인스-옥슬리法(Sarbanes-Oxley Ac)의 批判的 考察", 商事法判例硏究, 15 (2003)
  4. 徐世源, "會社業務執行任員制", 民事法硏究, (2)통권 : 10 (2002)
  5. 송호신, "주식회사 대표이사의 권한과 책임", 漢陽法學, 통권 : 22 (2008)
  6. 송호신, "자본시장통합법에 대한 해석과 법리의 고찰", 經濟法硏究, 6(2) (2007)
  7. 梁東錫, "執行任員의 役割과 法的 地位", 上場協, (48) (2003)
  8. 梁東錫, "任員制度導入에 따른 法的問題", 商事法硏究, 20(2) (2001)
  9. 양만식, "집행임원제도의 도입에 따른 지배구조의 전개", 商事法硏究, 24 (2005)
  10. 이영주, "집행임원의 소송법상 문제에 관한 고찰 -주주대표소송과 증권관련집단소송을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, (16), pp.89~122 (2004), 한국기업법학회
  11. 임상혁, "“집행임원제도 도입의 문제점”, ?CEO REPORT ON CURRENT ISSUE? 전국경제인연합회 CER-2006-15(2006.8)", ~ (2006)
  12. 전삼현, "독일 감사회제도의 문제점", 商事法硏究, 22(2) (2003)
  13. 전우현, "주식회사 감사위원회제도의 개선에 관한 일고찰 - 집행임원제 필요성에 관한 검토의 부가", 商事法硏究, 23(3) (2004)
  14. 鄭燦亨, "한국 주식회사에서의 집행임원에 대한 연구", 고려법학, (43) (2004)
  15. 鄭快英, "任員制度의 導入에 관한 硏究", 商事法硏究, 22(5) (2004)
  16. 車大運, "執行任員制度의 導入 必要性과 立法論的 課題", 上場協, 49(春季) (2004)
  17. 홍복기, "주식회사의 지배구조에 관한 2006년 회사법 개정시안", 商事法硏究, 25(2) (2006)
  18. 홍복기, "주식회사에 있어서 집행임원제도의 도입과 그 과제", 商事判例硏究, 19(4) (2006)
  19. 한국상장회사협의회, "집행임뭔제도의 법제화에 관한 의견", 월간상장, (373) (2006)
  20. 한국상장회사협의회 조사지원파트, "2007년도 주권상장법인 경영인 현황" (2007), 한국상장회사협의회
  21. "김보리 기자, 임시국회를 앞둔 주요현안, ?이데일리? 2008년 4월 23일 (http:", news, pp.econo, newsRead.asp?sub_cd=DA31&newsid=02607606586379072&clkcode=00203&DirCode =0020403&curtype=read)
  22. "삼성전자 분기보고서"[URL]
  23. Committee on Corporate Laws, "Changes in the Model Business Corporation Act-Amendments Pertainging Directors and Officers", Bus.Law, 54 (2000)
  24. Harry G.Henn, "Laws of Corporations" (1983), Westing Publishing Co.
  25. James D.Cox, "Corporation" (2003), Aspen
  26. John J Huber, "Response to Enron : The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Commission Rulemaking", pp.2002, PLI
  27. Kenneth W.Clarkson, "West's Business Law, Text & Cases" (1983), West Publishing Co.
  28. Melvin A.Eisenberg, "The Struture of Corporation - A Legal Analysis" (1976), Little, Brown & Company
  29. Notes, "The good, the band, and their corporate codes of ethics : Enron, Sarbanes-Oxley, and the problems with legislating good behavior", Harvard Law Review, 116(7) (2003)
  30. Robert C.Clark, "Corporation Law" (1986), Little,Brown and Company
  31. 近藤光男, "執行役", 民商法雜誌, 126(4ㆍ5) (2002)
  32. 前田庸, "商法等の一部を改正する法律案要綱の解說(Ⅲ)", 商事法務, (1623) (2002)
  33. 澤口寶, "執行役員制導入上の問題点", 商事法務, (1494) (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)