여성건강간호학회지에 게재된 중재 연구 논문보고의 질 평가:TREND 지침에 근거하여
The Quality of Reporting of Intervention Studies in the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing (KJWHN): Based on the TREND Guidelines
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was done to evaluate quality of reports of non-randomized controlled quasi-experimental study articles published in the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing (KJWHN). Methods: A search was done for experimental studies assessing intervention effects among all articles published in the KJWHNfrom 2008 to 2013. Original articles were reviewed and analyzed according to the 22 checklist items of the guidelines for Transparent Reporting for Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs (TREND). Results: Thirty-five articles on experimental studies were identified. The evaluation of the quality of reporting in these experimental studies found that there was a wide variety in the level of satisfying the TREND checklist. In particular, according to TREND topics, low levels of reporting quality were found for "title & abstract (only for information on how units were allocated to the intervention)","outcomes in methods", "assignment in methods", "blinding in methods", "recruitment in results", "baseline data in results", "interpretation in discussion (especially intervention mechanism and success or barriers), "generalizability in discussion". Conclusion: Results indicate that adherence to TREND guidelines varied in experimental studies published in the KJWHN suggesting the recommendation that for higher levels of complete reporting, TREND guidelines be used in reports on experimental studies.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was done to evaluate quality of reports of non-randomized controlled quasi-experimental study articles published in the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing (KJWHN). Methods: A search was done for experimental studies assessing intervention effects among all articles published in the KJWHNfrom 2008 to 2013. Original articles were reviewed and analyzed according to the 22 checklist items of the guidelines for Transparent Reporting for Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs (TREND). Results: Thirty-five articles on experimental studies were identified. The evaluation of the quality of reporting in these experimental studies found that there was a wide variety in the level of satisfying the TREND checklist. In particular, according to TREND topics, low levels of reporting quality were found for "title & abstract (only for information on how units were allocated to the intervention)","outcomes in methods", "assignment in methods", "blinding in methods", "recruitment in results", "baseline data in results", "interpretation in discussion (especially intervention mechanism and success or barriers), "generalizability in discussion". Conclusion: Results indicate that adherence to TREND guidelines varied in experimental studies published in the KJWHN suggesting the recommendation that for higher levels of complete reporting, TREND guidelines be used in reports on experimental studies.
참고문헌 (15)
- "TREND supporters" (2011)[URL]
- Des Jarlais, D. C., "Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TERND statement", American Journal of Public Health, 94, pp.361~366 (2004)
- 황예원, "국내 의학 잡지에 게재된 무작위대조임상시험 논문들의 보고의 질", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 29(4), pp.276~282 (2008), 대한가정의학회
- Juni, P., "Systematic reviews in healthcare: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials", British Medical Journal, 323, pp.42~46 (2001)
- 김형준, "가정의학회지에 실린 중재 관련 비무작위연구논문의 질 평가", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 30(02), pp.129~137 (2009), 대한가정의학회
- 김경희, "간호연구 질 평가 도구 및 보고지침 고찰", Journal of korean biological nursing science, 14(3), pp.221~230 (2012), 기초간호학회
- Lachin, J. M., "Statistical considerations in the intent-totreat principle", Controlled Clinical Trials, 21, pp.169~189 (2000)
- Moher, D., "CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials", International Journal of Surgery, 10, pp.28~55 (2012)
- Riethmuller, A. M., "Efficacy of interventions to improve motor development in young children: A systematic review", Pediatrics, 124, pp.e782~e792 (2009)
- Rothwell, P. M., "External validity of randomized controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?"", Lancet, 365, pp.82~93 (2005)
- 신철민, "임상연구 논문의 질 평가를 위한 도구들", 대한정신약물학회지, 22(2), pp.67~72 (2011), 대한정신약물학회
- Vandenbroucke, J. P., "Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration", Epidermiology, 18, pp.805~835 (2007)
- Walker, W., "The strengths and weaknesses of research designs involving quantitative measures", Journal of Research in Nursing, 10, pp.571~582 (2005)
- Wood, L., "Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: Meta-epidemiological study", British Medical Journal, 336, pp.601~605 (2008)
- 유승현, "건강증진 연구 보고지침", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 29(4), pp.83~99 (2012), 한국보건교육건강증진학회