여성건강간호학회지에 게재된 차이검정을 이용한 논문의 통계활용 분석
Analysis on Reports of Statistical Testing for Mean Differences in Articles in the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the accuracy and adequacy of research studies reporting statistical testing for mean differences in studies of the Korean Journal of Women Health. Methods: Among articles published in the journal from 2007 to 2009, 75 studies using t-test, x^2-test, and ANOVA were identified. The studies were evaluated using structured analysis format for adequacy of research title, accuracy of statistical methods and resentation styles, and errors in reported statistical outcomes. Results: In this study, the research titles generally reflected the purpose of research and study designs. Thus the research titles were quite comprehensive. Also, there was compatibility between the research purpose and research design. Most important though, many errors were identified in the tables of results of the statistical analysis in articles published from 2004 to 2006. Conclusion: Over six years, 2004 to 2009, accuracy and adequacy of research studies has improved in many aspects. In order to enhance the completeness of the published papers and to be an internationally recognized nursing journal, close attention of the researchers, reviewers and editors is necessary to avoid errors and present adequate and accurate research.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the accuracy and adequacy of research studies reporting statistical testing for mean differences in studies of the Korean Journal of Women Health. Methods: Among articles published in the journal from 2007 to 2009, 75 studies using t-test, x^2-test, and ANOVA were identified. The studies were evaluated using structured analysis format for adequacy of research title, accuracy of statistical methods and resentation styles, and errors in reported statistical outcomes. Results: In this study, the research titles generally reflected the purpose of research and study designs. Thus the research titles were quite comprehensive. Also, there was compatibility between the research purpose and research design. Most important though, many errors were identified in the tables of results of the statistical analysis in articles published from 2004 to 2006. Conclusion: Over six years, 2004 to 2009, accuracy and adequacy of research studies has improved in many aspects. In order to enhance the completeness of the published papers and to be an internationally recognized nursing journal, close attention of the researchers, reviewers and editors is necessary to avoid errors and present adequate and accurate research.
참고문헌 (8)
- American Psychological Association, "Publication manual of the american psychological association.(5th ed.)" (2001)
- 조동숙, "Analysis on Reports of Statistical Testings for Correlation and Regression", 여성건강간호학회지, 14(3), pp.213~220 (2008), 여성건강간호학회
- 정재원, "차이검정을 이용한 논문의 통계활용 분석", 여성건강간호학회지, 13(3), pp.211~218 (2007), 여성건강간호학회
- 강현철, "최근 3년간(1999-2001) 대한간호학회지의 통계기법 활용에 대한 분석", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 32(7), pp.929~935 (2002), 한국간호과학회
- 김증임, "여성건강간호학회지의 최근 3년간의 논문분석 (2007-2009년)", 여성건강간호학회지, 16(3), pp.307~316 (2010), 여성건강간호학회
- 김 증 임, "여성건강간호학회지의 최근 3년간의 논문분석(2004-2006년)", 여성건강간호학회지, 13(1), pp.51~59 (2007), 여성건강간호학회
- 이은주, "최근 3년간(2007~2009년) 여성건강간호학회지의 상관분석과 회귀분석 통계활용 논문 분석", 여성건강간호학회지, 17(2), pp.187~194 (2011), 여성건강간호학회
- 신현숙, "최근 2년간 Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 게재논문 분석-연구 동향, 실험중재, 연구의 근거등급을 중심으로", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 40(1), pp.139~149 (2010), 한국간호과학회
