하이데거의 사유에서 무의 지위에 대한 해석 (1) －『존재와 시간』에서 무가 갖는 세계와 자기와의 관계를 중심으로－
On the Status of the Nothing in Heidegger’s Thought －Focusing on the Relation of the Nothing to the World and the Self－
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The focus of this paper, which belongs to the first half of the project to clarify the conception of the Nothing (das Nichts) which figures in Heidegger’s Being and Time and “What is Metaphysics?”, is on the interpretation of the former work. First, I criticized the preceding interpretations, proposed by Walter Schultz, Alberto Rosales and William J. Richardson, regarding the Nothing as either the world which the subject discloses or the disclosure of Being itself. I discuss that drawing a strict line between these two choices is misleading because both do not seem to be oppositional to each other. The Nothing is the experience of Dasein’s transfer of disclosedness (Erschlossenheit): this transfer of the Dasein’s disclosedness indicates the experience which Dasein discloses their own world by escaping from the dominance of public world and domestic environment (die Umwelt). Furthermore, the transfer of the Dasein’s disclosedness is that of the self which Dasein regains herself from the way of living as they-selves (das Man-selbst). Consequently, I will interpret that Dasein’s transfer of disclosedness indicates that Dasein regaining herself could let beings reveal as themselves.
Abstract
The focus of this paper, which belongs to the first half of the project to clarify the conception of the Nothing (das Nichts) which figures in Heidegger’s Being and Time and “What is Metaphysics?”, is on the interpretation of the former work. First, I criticized the preceding interpretations, proposed by Walter Schultz, Alberto Rosales and William J. Richardson, regarding the Nothing as either the world which the subject discloses or the disclosure of Being itself. I discuss that drawing a strict line between these two choices is misleading because both do not seem to be oppositional to each other. The Nothing is the experience of Dasein’s transfer of disclosedness (Erschlossenheit): this transfer of the Dasein’s disclosedness indicates the experience which Dasein discloses their own world by escaping from the dominance of public world and domestic environment (die Umwelt). Furthermore, the transfer of the Dasein’s disclosedness is that of the self which Dasein regains herself from the way of living as they-selves (das Man-selbst). Consequently, I will interpret that Dasein’s transfer of disclosedness indicates that Dasein regaining herself could let beings reveal as themselves.
참고문헌 (24)
- 하이데거, "존재와 시간" (1995), 경문사
- 하이데거, "형이상학의 근본개념들" (2001), 까치
- 김재철, "아리스토텔레스에 대한 현상학적 해석" (2010), 누멘
- 신상희, "강연과 논문 (마르틴 하이데거)" (2008), 이학사
- M. Heidegger, "Sein und Zeit, GA 2" (1977), Vittorio Klostermann
- 하이데거, "Holzwege, GA 5" (1977), Vittorio Klostermann
- 하이데거, "Vorträge und Aufsätze, GA 7" (1978), Vittorio Klostermann
- 하이데거, "Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz, GA 26" (1978), Vittorio Klostermann
- 30, "Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik: Welt-Endlichkeit-Einsamkeit, GA 29", pp.1975, 하이데거
- 하이데거, "Phänomenologische Interpretationen ausgewählter Abhandlungen des Aristoteles zur Ontologie und Logic, GA 62" (2005), Vittorio Klostermann
- 김도연, "소와 함께 여행하는 법" (2007), 열림원
- 박찬국, "초기 하이데거의 철학을 결단주의나 주의주의로 보는 해석에 대한 비판적 고찰－본래적인 실존의 구체적인 모습을 찾아서－", 철학사상, (30), pp.165~199 (2008), 철학사상연구소
- 정윤석, "아렌트의 하이데거 비판: ‘세계’ 개념을 중심으로", 철학, (88), pp.207~230 (2006), 한국철학회
- 조형국, "M. 하이데거: 일상의 발견. <존재와 시간>에 나타난 현존재의 일상성과 결단성에 관한 숙고를 바탕으로", 존재론 연구, (15), pp.187~220 (2007), 한국하이데거학회
- 하 피터, "현존재의 “유아론적인 자기”와 “더불어 있음”(Mitsein)", 존재론 연구, (10), pp.5~5 (2004), 한국하이데거학회
- 김종대, "하이데거의 예술론" (2008), 나라
- 발터 슐츠, "근대형이상학에 있어서 철학자의 신" (1995), 사랑의 학교
- 오토 푀겔러, "하이데거 사유의 길" (1993), 문예출판사
- Alberto Rosales, "Heideggers Kehre im Lichte ihrer Interpretationen”, Hrg. Dietrich Papenfuss und Otto Pöggeler, Zur philosophischen Aktualtät Heideggers, 하이데거의 사유에서 무의 지위에 대한 해석 (1)", Symposium, 4, pp.119~140 (1989)
- Klaus Held, "Heidegger und die praktische Philosophie", pp.111~139 (1988), Frankfurt am Main
- Otto Pöggeler, "Der Denkweg Martin Heideggers" (1994), Verlag Günther Neske
- Walter Schülz, "Heidegger: Perspektiven zur Deutung seines Werkes", pp.95~139 (1970)
- Walter Schülz, "Der Gott der Neuzeitlichen Metaphysik" (1991), Neske
- William J. Richardson, "Through Phenomenology to Thought" (1963), The Hague