1728년 湖南 戊申亂의 전개양상과 叛亂軍의 성격
The Development of the 1728 Honam Mushin Revolt and the Features of the Rebel Forces
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The 1728 Honam Mushin revolt can be defined as the coup some officials from radical Soron who got ousted from the central government positions after the factional strife staged along with people of various classes including the governor of Jeolla and local officials in Taein, Mujang, Jeongeup and Suncheon, Namin in Honam region, and the wealthy ruling classes in Honam region who failed to enter government service. However, the revolt ended up achieving little, compared with the one in the Hoseo region which occupied a military fortress and the one in Yeongnam region that occupied several counties and prefectures. That was because of the failure in winning the support from the government forces and the weak bond among rebel forces in Honam which led the Na family of Naju and groups in Gobu that had promised to join the revolt to choose not to participate the revolt. Furthermore, the failure to muster an army in the Honam Mushin revolt made it impossible for those who led the revolt to cooperate with those who led the revolt in Hoseo region. As a result, the 1728 Mushin revolt ended in failure. The study examined the features of rebel forces in Honam. To begin with, those who led the revolt in Honam including Park Pil-hyeon, as the members of radical Soron, participated in the revolt to recapture the power after being ousted from the central government. Second, the members of the Na family of Naju such as Na Sung-dae and Na Man-chi, wealthy Namin in Naju, participated in the revolt because of their political position characterized by their ancestors' involvement in the accusations of high treason in 1589 and their kinship with those who led the revolt including Lee In-jwa. Third, unlike the ruling classes in Naju, some people from groups of Gobu like Kim Su-jong, the ruling class in Buan, did not belong to a certain political party, but they were the wealthy ruling classes living in areas where people had few chances to hold a post in the central government. It seems that the rebel forces accepted Park Pil-hyeon's request to participate the revolt in the hope of holding posts in the central government.
Abstract
The 1728 Honam Mushin revolt can be defined as the coup some officials from radical Soron who got ousted from the central government positions after the factional strife staged along with people of various classes including the governor of Jeolla and local officials in Taein, Mujang, Jeongeup and Suncheon, Namin in Honam region, and the wealthy ruling classes in Honam region who failed to enter government service. However, the revolt ended up achieving little, compared with the one in the Hoseo region which occupied a military fortress and the one in Yeongnam region that occupied several counties and prefectures. That was because of the failure in winning the support from the government forces and the weak bond among rebel forces in Honam which led the Na family of Naju and groups in Gobu that had promised to join the revolt to choose not to participate the revolt. Furthermore, the failure to muster an army in the Honam Mushin revolt made it impossible for those who led the revolt to cooperate with those who led the revolt in Hoseo region. As a result, the 1728 Mushin revolt ended in failure. The study examined the features of rebel forces in Honam. To begin with, those who led the revolt in Honam including Park Pil-hyeon, as the members of radical Soron, participated in the revolt to recapture the power after being ousted from the central government. Second, the members of the Na family of Naju such as Na Sung-dae and Na Man-chi, wealthy Namin in Naju, participated in the revolt because of their political position characterized by their ancestors' involvement in the accusations of high treason in 1589 and their kinship with those who led the revolt including Lee In-jwa. Third, unlike the ruling classes in Naju, some people from groups of Gobu like Kim Su-jong, the ruling class in Buan, did not belong to a certain political party, but they were the wealthy ruling classes living in areas where people had few chances to hold a post in the central government. It seems that the rebel forces accepted Park Pil-hyeon's request to participate the revolt in the hope of holding posts in the central government.
참고문헌 (30)
- 이우성, "지방토호 대 중앙권력층의 투쟁, in 경상남도지 상" (1959)
- "勘亂錄", ~
- "거창신씨세보", ~
- "景宗實錄", ~
- 고수연, "1728년 무신란과 청주지역 사족동향", 박사, 사학과, pp.2008
- 고수연, "1728년 湖西地域戊申亂의 叛亂軍성격", 역사와 실학, (44), pp.117~156 (2011), 역사실학회
- 김문택, "16~17世紀 羅州地方의 士族動向과 書院鄕戰", 淸溪史學, 11 (1994)
- 김문택, "호남지역 서원의 지역적 특성과 정치적 성격―나주羅州 경현서원景賢書院을 중심으로-", 국학연구, 1(11), pp.55~86 (2007), 한국국학진흥원
- "무신역옥추안", ~
- "비변사등록", ~
- "肅宗實錄", ~
- "英祖實錄", ~
- 오갑균, "영조 무신란에 관한 고찰", 역사교육, 21 (1977), 역사교육연구회
- 이상옥, "영조 무신란의 연구", 우석사학, 2 (1969)
- 이원균, "영조 무신란에 대하여-영남의 정희량 난을 중심으로-", 부대사학, 2 (1971), 부산대사학회
- 이재철, "18세기 경상우도 사림과 정희량난", 대구사학, 71 (1986), 대구사학회
- 이종범, "1728년 무신란의 성격", 석사, pp.1984
- 이종범, "1728년 무신란의 성격", 석사, 사학과, pp.1984
- 이종범, "여러 지역 항쟁과 ‘무신란’, in 한국사 36" (1997), 국사편찬위원회
- 李重煥, "擇里志"
- 이해준, "조선후기 문중서원 연구", 박사, 국사학과, pp.1993
- 전경목, "고문서를 통해 본 우반동과 우반동 김씨의 역사", pp.32~37 (2001), 신아출판사
- "전라문화의 맥과 전북인물", ~
- 전형택, "조선후기 노비신분연구", pp.49~ (1989), 일조각
- "闡義昭鑑", ~
- "추안급국안 권21, 192책"
- "남원지" (1992), 남원지편찬위원회
- "乙未獄事錄", ~
- "전북의병사" (1990), 전북향토문화연구회
- "湖南節義錄" (1990), 전라남도
