동학농민전쟁에 대한 역사교과서 서술 내용의 새로운 모색 -동아시아적 시각과 ‘나눔과 배려’의 정신을 중심으로-
New examination on descriptions on Donghak peasant war in history textbooks -Focuses on East-Asian views and the spirit of ‘Sharing and caring’ -
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The focus of descriptions on Donghak peasant war in history textbooks so far was on “a fight against anti-feudalism and foreign power”. These descriptions were based on nationalistic one-country history. However, the basis of these descriptions can downsize the meaning of Donghak peasant revolution or disregard current meaning or stereo-type it. First, the thoughts and actions of Donghak peasant war and peasants’ army contain large amount of important meanings and values to look back today’s our society and our lives. We need to approach their thoughts and actions from a new viewpoint to restore those values into present value. Various requests and a code of conducts raised by Donghak peasant army contains desires of the public seeking a new society and a new world where one can live as a human being. I believe that we can reach important results in relation with thoughts on new cultural alternatives overcoming inconsistencies and ills of modern society if we can meditate the historical meaning of the revolution and succeed it in more progressive ways. One of those is the spirit of ‘sharing and caring’ practiced by Donghak peasant army while engaged in peasant revolution. Donghak peasant war was not an incident limited to Korean peninsula only. The uprising of Donghak peasant revolution was closely related with policies in Korea by Japan and China. The Sino-Japanese War which was the direct cause for Donghak peasant war restructured international order in East Asia based on “Hwairon (respect China and repel foreign intruders)” to modern international order. The history textbooks need to broaden students’ views on the history by emphasizing East-Asian meaning that Donghak peasant war has.
Abstract
The focus of descriptions on Donghak peasant war in history textbooks so far was on “a fight against anti-feudalism and foreign power”. These descriptions were based on nationalistic one-country history. However, the basis of these descriptions can downsize the meaning of Donghak peasant revolution or disregard current meaning or stereo-type it. First, the thoughts and actions of Donghak peasant war and peasants’ army contain large amount of important meanings and values to look back today’s our society and our lives. We need to approach their thoughts and actions from a new viewpoint to restore those values into present value. Various requests and a code of conducts raised by Donghak peasant army contains desires of the public seeking a new society and a new world where one can live as a human being. I believe that we can reach important results in relation with thoughts on new cultural alternatives overcoming inconsistencies and ills of modern society if we can meditate the historical meaning of the revolution and succeed it in more progressive ways. One of those is the spirit of ‘sharing and caring’ practiced by Donghak peasant army while engaged in peasant revolution. Donghak peasant war was not an incident limited to Korean peninsula only. The uprising of Donghak peasant revolution was closely related with policies in Korea by Japan and China. The Sino-Japanese War which was the direct cause for Donghak peasant war restructured international order in East Asia based on “Hwairon (respect China and repel foreign intruders)” to modern international order. The history textbooks need to broaden students’ views on the history by emphasizing East-Asian meaning that Donghak peasant war has.
참고문헌 (32)
- "(교육부 고시 제 1997 - 15호) 고등 학교 교육 과정 : 교과목별 교육과정 해설(사회과)", ~
- 이상찬, "1896년 의병운동 통설에 대한 비판적 검토", 역사비평, (겨울) (1998)
- 오지영, "東學史, In 東學思想資料集 貳", pp.456~, 아세아문화사
- 배항섭, "19세기 지배질서의 변화와 정치문화의 변용 -仁政 願望의 향방을 중심으로-", 韓國史學報, (39), pp.109~158 (2010), 고려사학회
- "교육과학기술부 고시 제 2009-41호에 따른 고등학교 교육과정 해설 : 총론", 교육과학기술부, ~ (2009)
- "제7차 고등학교 교육과정 해설 : 총론", 103~
- "교육인적자원부 고시 제2007-79호에 따른 고등학교 교육과정 해설 : 총론", 교육과학기술부, ~ (2008)
- 배항섭, "‘근대이행기’의 민중의식: ‘근대’와 ‘반근대’의 너머 ― 토지소유 및 매매관습에 대한 인식을 중심으로", 역사문제연구, 14(1), pp.57~96 (2010), 역사문제연구소
- 崔承熙, "書院(儒林)勢力의 東學 排斥運動 小考, In 韓㳓劤博士停年紀念史學論叢" (1981)
- 裵亢燮, "제1차농민전쟁 시기 농민군의 행동양태와 지향", 한국근현대사연구, 21, pp.7~34 (2002), 한국근현대사학회
- 배항섭, "제1차 동학농민전쟁 시기 농민군의 진격로와 활동 양상", 동학연구, 11 (2002)
- 조병한, "태평천국과 중국의 농민운동", pp.73~ (1981), 인간
- 김성찬, "태평천국과 염군, In 강좌중국사Ⅴ", pp.91~ (1989)
- 조너선 D. 스펜스, "신의 아들 : 홍수전과 태평천국", pp.227~ (2006), 이산
- 趙矢元, "중국근대사", pp.54~57 (1990), 청년사
- 菊池秀明, "太平天國における不寬容, In 東アジア近現代通史 1 : 東アジア世界の近代(19世紀)" (2010), 岩波書店
- 조너선. 스펜스, "신의 아들 : 홍수전과 태평천국", pp.391~394 (2006), 이산
- J. F. C. 해리슨, "영국민중사", pp.82~ (1984), 소나무
- 프리드리히 엥겔스, "독일혁명사 2부작", pp.103~ (1988), 소나무
- 노만 콘, "천년왕국운동사", pp.299~300 (1993), 한국신학연구소
- 사회과 교육과정, , 2011
- 박종근, "청일전쟁과 조선" (1989), 일조각
- 동학농민혁명기념사업회, "동학농민혁명의 동아시아적 의미" (2002), 서경
- 姜孝叔, "第2次東學農民戰爭と日淸戰爭 : 防衛硏究所圖書館所藏史料を中心に", 歷史學硏究, 762 (2002)
- 나카츠카 아키라, "1894년, 경북궁을 점령하라" (2002), 푸른역사
- 박맹수, "이단의 민중반란" (2008), 역사비평사
- 강효숙, "제2차 동학농민전쟁과 일본군 - 일본군의 생포농민군 처리를 중심으로 -", 전북사학, (30), pp.63~100 (2007), 전북사학회
- 배항섭, "동학농민전쟁 당시 일본군의 개입과 그 영향", 군사, (53), pp.219~253 (2004), 국방부군사편찬연구소
- 후지무라 미치오, "청일전쟁", pp.68~69 (1997), 소화
- 배항섭, "1894年 東學農民軍의 反日 抗爭과 ‘民族的 大聯合’ 推進", 軍史, 35 (1997)
- "2009년 개정 교육과정에 따른 교과 교육과정 적용을 위한 고등학교 한국사 교과서 집필 기준", 교육과학기술부, ~ (2011)
- 유용태, "한국의 동아시아 인식과 구성, In 한중일 동아시아사 교육의 현황과 과제", pp.49~ (2008), 선인
