<의무교육역사과정표준>의 수정을 통해 본 중국의 역사교육
The education of history in China at the revision of history curriculum of compulsory education standard
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Nowdays, It is not too much to say that China makes the most of education as means of development of nation and race,Moreover, China intends to make all the people to patriots through the nationwide movements of patriotic education. In the situation, our approach to the China's education, especially the education of history should be careful. It is considered that we don't have to be attached to the distortion of history connect with Korea in the textbooks. Now, China is approaching to history education not as a school education but as a modernization of socialism and succession and development of tradition. Lately, China made and announced the demonstrational copy <History curriculum of compulsory education standard> that they have experimented for long into the revisional copy <History curriculum of compulsory education standard>. This revisional copy shows directly where the value of history education that China has pursued is. The revisional copy <History curriculum of compulsory education standard> has the following features comparing to the demonstrational copy in composition and description. First, a goal that the curriculum content searches is expressed by direct and clear words. Second, they prearranged the historical contents that the party and the government aim and generalized the historical facts. Third, they applied the several historical projects to educational curriculum and tried to complete the greatness of Chinese culture and the discussion on united multiracial nation. That is to say, they completed the past historical reorganization for the current China in China's angle. We have to think how we should recognize the history education of Chiana, and how we cope with the admission of historical project related to Korean history. Korea and China maintain "strategic company" diplomatically, however China have gotten a big power, and North Korea relies on China in many ways. In this situation that China has a strong right to speak about North Korea, the issue of racial identity is very important to Korea but not to China. And Being based on unified multi-nation theory, China's historical project is the national strategy for their survival. So It is a solid fact that China never concede the problem of history among each(minority) race. And recently Chinese' anti-Korean Sentiment becomes serious. In this situation our opinion and request about Chinese history education can't evoke an echo. It's time to work hard to prepare for countermeasure about a revolution of Chinese history education.
Abstract
Nowdays, It is not too much to say that China makes the most of education as means of development of nation and race,Moreover, China intends to make all the people to patriots through the nationwide movements of patriotic education. In the situation, our approach to the China's education, especially the education of history should be careful. It is considered that we don't have to be attached to the distortion of history connect with Korea in the textbooks. Now, China is approaching to history education not as a school education but as a modernization of socialism and succession and development of tradition. Lately, China made and announced the demonstrational copy <History curriculum of compulsory education standard> that they have experimented for long into the revisional copy <History curriculum of compulsory education standard>. This revisional copy shows directly where the value of history education that China has pursued is. The revisional copy <History curriculum of compulsory education standard> has the following features comparing to the demonstrational copy in composition and description. First, a goal that the curriculum content searches is expressed by direct and clear words. Second, they prearranged the historical contents that the party and the government aim and generalized the historical facts. Third, they applied the several historical projects to educational curriculum and tried to complete the greatness of Chinese culture and the discussion on united multiracial nation. That is to say, they completed the past historical reorganization for the current China in China's angle. We have to think how we should recognize the history education of Chiana, and how we cope with the admission of historical project related to Korean history. Korea and China maintain "strategic company" diplomatically, however China have gotten a big power, and North Korea relies on China in many ways. In this situation that China has a strong right to speak about North Korea, the issue of racial identity is very important to Korea but not to China. And Being based on unified multi-nation theory, China's historical project is the national strategy for their survival. So It is a solid fact that China never concede the problem of history among each(minority) race. And recently Chinese' anti-Korean Sentiment becomes serious. In this situation our opinion and request about Chinese history education can't evoke an echo. It's time to work hard to prepare for countermeasure about a revolution of Chinese history education.
참고문헌 (51)
- 김유리, "역사교학대강에서 역사과정표준으로― 최근 중국의 역사교육과정 개혁 ―", 역사교육, (96), pp.59~94 (2005), 역사교육연구회
- 김지훈, "중국의 신교육과정과 역사과정표준실험교과서", 동북아역사논총, (17), pp.223~260 (2007), 동북아역사재단
- 윤휘탁, "중국 중고교 역사교과서에 반영된 ‘中華意識’", 중국사연구, (45), pp.257~291 (2006), 중국사학회
- 김종건, "中國 歷史敎科書上의 韓國 關聯 敍述 內容 變化에 대한 檢討 -最近 初級中學 『中國歷史』 敎科書를 中心으로-", 중국사연구, 69(69), pp.129~156 (2010), 중국사학회
- 김지훈, "중국고등학교역사교과서의현황과특징" (2010), 동북아역사재단
- 김종박, "중국역사교과서의 통일적다민족국가론" (2011), 동북아역사재단
- 우성민, "韓‧中間 ‘相互理解와 歷史和解’의 認識 提高를 위한 歷史敎科書의 課題 - 韓‧中 中高校 歷史敎科書의 敍述 事例를 中心으로 -", 중국사연구, 75(75), pp.231~264 (2011), 중국사학회
- "중국의 교육개혁 동향 보고" (2005)[URL]
- "教育部关于印發《基礎教育課程改革綱要(施行)》的通知" (2001)[URL]
- 권소연, "중국 역사교육과정의 변화와 추이", 중국근현대사연구, 31(31), pp.185~221 (2006), 중국근현대사학회
- "普通高中歷史課程標準解讀" (2003), 江蘇敎育出版社
- "愛國主義敎育實施綱要"[URL]
- 윤휘탁, "中國의 愛國主義와 歷史敎育", 中國史硏究, 18, pp.284~ (2002), 중국사학회
- 劉軍, "歷史敎學的新視野" (2003), 高等敎育出版社
- 劉軍, "全日制義務敎育 歷史課程標準(實驗稿)", pp.1~ (2001), 北京師範大學出版社
- 劉軍, "普通高中 歷史課程標準(實驗)", pp.1~ (2003), 人民敎育出版社
- 劉軍, "歷史敎學的新視野", pp.292~293 (2003), 高等敎育出版社
- 陳培, "高中歷史新課程敎學的困惑與對策, In 歷史敎學經驗交流", pp.120~121 (2006), 人民敎育出版社
- "全日制義務敎育歷史課程標準解讀" (2002), 北京師範大學出版社
- "普通高中歷史課程標準解讀" (2003), 江蘇敎育出版社
- "中學歷史敎學論" (2010), 北京師範大學出版社
- 濟南市敎學硏究室, "高中歷史敎學案例分析" (2005), 山東敎育出版社
- 張一平, "初中歷史新課程敎學法" (2010), 首都師範大學出版社
- 吳執斌, "關于敎學中如何利用和處理敎材的幾個問題" (2012), 人民敎育出版社
- 崔榮國, "走進課改, 培養學生自主學習能力, In 歷史敎學經驗交流", pp.22~ (2006), 人民敎育出版社
- 張建福, "歷史敎學經驗交流", pp.2~ (2006), 人民敎育出版社
- 李少娟, "取之有道 -新課標下歷史敎材的整合與取捨, In 歷史敎學經驗交流", pp.92~93 (2006), 人民敎育出版社
- 張建福, "感悟新課程, In 歷史敎學經驗交流", pp.10~ (2006), 人民敎育出版社
- 呂淑杰, "讓歷史課堂‘活’起來-新課改下歷史敎學的幾点體會, In 歷史敎學經驗交流", pp.1~3 (2006), 人民敎育出版社
- 曾慶文, "談在歷史新課程實施中學生課程資源的開發和利用, In 歷史敎學經驗交流", pp.56~58 (2006), 人民敎育出版社
- 이상엽, "중국 농촌의무교육의 실태와 발전방안", 한국자치행정학보, 23(1), pp.373~397 (2009), 한국자치행정학회
- "農村敎改, 創新思路更重要" (2012)[URL]
- 陳淑貞, "“我與歷史新課程”敎學論文-關于鄕鎭歷史敎學的幾点感受, In 歷史敎學經驗交流", pp.44~46 (2006), 人民敎育出版社
- 李少娟, "取之有道-新課標下歷史敎材的整合與取捨, In 歷史敎學經驗交流", pp.91~94 (2006), 人民敎育出版社
- 辛魯, "淺談新課標下如何落實歷史敎學的“過程”目標, In 歷史敎學經驗交流", pp.52~ (2006), 人民敎育出版社
- "農村敎改, 創新思路更重要" (2012)[URL]
- "国家中長期教育改革和發展规劃綱要 (2010-2020年)"[URL]
- "中共敎育部黨組關于認識學習宣傳貫徹黨的十七届六中全會精神的通知" (2011)[URL]
- "教育部关于印發義務教育語文等學科課程標准" (2011)[URL]
- "중국교육동향파악정리(교육과정)" (2012)[URL]
- "從‘雙基“到”四基“ : 思想的感悟和經驗的積累" (2012)[URL]
- "解读新课程标准:德育·能力·创新·减负·审慎" (2012)[URL]
- (2012)[URL]
- "義務敎育歷史課程標準", pp.1~ (2012), 北京師範大學出版社
- "義務敎育歷史課程標準", pp.2~3 (2012), 北京師範大學出版社
- 하도겸, "한중간 역사문제의 현황과 대응방안", 중국사연구, (73), pp.319~343 (2011), 중국사학회
- "연합뉴스" (2012)[URL]
