본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선후기 文科에 나타난 京鄕 간의 불균형 문제 검토

The Imbalance in successful passers’ numbers in the Capital and Local regions, displayed in the outcome of the Civil Examination system(Mun-gwa, 文科), during the latter half of the Joseon dynasty period

0

조회

0

다운로드

37

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Since the 17th century, a certain imbalance, between the number of successful passers for the National Civil examination system(Mun-gwa, 文科) who were living in the Capital city, and the number of such people who were living in the local regions, started to form. It became a serious issue to be discussed with, in this period. Examined in this article is why such imbalance happened in the first place, and how it progressed. In the early half of the Joseon period, passers of the civil examination were mostly from the Capital city, or from the Gyeongsang-do and Jeolla-do regions. But such tendency did not show up in different forms, according to the type of test they applied to. Then, in the 17th century, the biennial “Shik’nyeon-shi” exam, which usually tested the applicants’ knowledge and understanding of the Classic texts(講經), became a test that mostly selected Confucian students living and studying in local regions, while the “Gyeong-gwa/慶科” exam(exams held to celebrate happy occasions), which tested the applicants’ skill in literary writing(製述), became a test that mostly selected Confucian students from the Capital. This ‘imbalance,’ or to be said as a separation in the selection process, in terms of the capital applicants and local ones, became a problem. The Shik’nyeon-shi exam was originally an exam that was designed to select high-ranking governmental officials, yet since the 17th century it lost such status and became a test only to select Confucian students from local regions. However, as the Court changed the examination subject of “Chin’rim-shi/親臨試” exam to make students from local regions apply to the exam more easily, the number of successful passers from them continuously increased. As a result, the imbalance was moderated. This chagne was brought about by the application strategy adopted by the student from local regions who wanted to pass the exam.

Abstract

Since the 17th century, a certain imbalance, between the number of successful passers for the National Civil examination system(Mun-gwa, 文科) who were living in the Capital city, and the number of such people who were living in the local regions, started to form. It became a serious issue to be discussed with, in this period. Examined in this article is why such imbalance happened in the first place, and how it progressed. In the early half of the Joseon period, passers of the civil examination were mostly from the Capital city, or from the Gyeongsang-do and Jeolla-do regions. But such tendency did not show up in different forms, according to the type of test they applied to. Then, in the 17th century, the biennial “Shik’nyeon-shi” exam, which usually tested the applicants’ knowledge and understanding of the Classic texts(講經), became a test that mostly selected Confucian students living and studying in local regions, while the “Gyeong-gwa/慶科” exam(exams held to celebrate happy occasions), which tested the applicants’ skill in literary writing(製述), became a test that mostly selected Confucian students from the Capital. This ‘imbalance,’ or to be said as a separation in the selection process, in terms of the capital applicants and local ones, became a problem. The Shik’nyeon-shi exam was originally an exam that was designed to select high-ranking governmental officials, yet since the 17th century it lost such status and became a test only to select Confucian students from local regions. However, as the Court changed the examination subject of “Chin’rim-shi/親臨試” exam to make students from local regions apply to the exam more easily, the number of successful passers from them continuously increased. As a result, the imbalance was moderated. This chagne was brought about by the application strategy adopted by the student from local regions who wanted to pass the exam.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. Benjamin A, Elman, "A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China", pp.239~249 (2000), University of California Press
  2. 元昌愛, "朝鮮時代 文科及第者 硏究", 박사, pp.1997
  3. Choe, Yong-ho, "朝鮮身分史硏究 : 身分과 그 移動" (1987), 법문사
  4. 송준호, "조선시대의 과거와 양반 및 양인 : 문과와 생원 진사를 중심으로 하여", 역사학보, 69 (1976), 역사학회
  5. 김경용, "科擧制度와 韓國近代敎育의 再認識" (2003), 교육과학사
  6. 이성무, "한국과거제도사" (1997), 민음사
  7. 박현순, "16~17세기 예안현 사족사회 연구", 박사, pp.2006
  8. 오수창, "조선후기 평안도 사회발전 연구", pp.127~135 (2003), 일조각
  9. 박현순, "17세기 과거 응시자 증가 현상에 대한 고찰", 사학연구, (93), pp.89~145 (2009), 한국사학회
  10. 박현순, "19세기 文科에 대한 고찰", 한국문화, (54), pp.33~70 (2011), 규장각한국학연구원
  11. 에드워드 와그너, "조선시대 출세의 사다리", pp.1~8 (1974), 일조각
  12. E. Wagner, "사회 완충제로서의 과거 : 서북지역의 사례 연구", Korea Journal, 17, pp.27~29 (1977)
  13. 차장섭, "조선후기벌열연구" (1997), 일조각
  14. 車美姬, "朝鮮時代 文科制度 硏究" (1999), 국학자료원
  15. 박현순, "16세기 禮安縣 士族層과 士族社會의 구성", 진단학보, 17(102), pp.125~162 (2006), 진단학회
  16. 이병혁, "한국과문연구 : 詩賦를 중심으로", 동양학, 16 (1986), 단국대 동양학연구소
  17. 황위주, "서울。、경기 지역의 퇴계문인과 그 성격, In 퇴계학맥의 지역적 전개", pp.519~534 (2004), 보고사
  18. 이병혁, "과문의 형식고(1), In 청천강용권박사송수기념논총" (1986)
  19. 이병혁, "한국과문연구 : 賦를 중심으로(III)", 부산한문학연구, 12 (1998), 동양한문학회
  20. 강석중, "한국 과부의 전개양상 연구", 박사, pp.1999
  21. 黃胤錫, "頤齋亂藁 권15"
  22. "定州邑誌", 校院學規圖說, ~
  23. 崔珍玉, "조선시대 평안도의 생원 진사시 합격자 실태", 조선시대사학보, (36), pp.211~251 (2006), 조선시대사학회
  24. "연안김씨개성부윤공파보", 연안김씨지문하성사유간공종회개성부윤공파보지회, ~ (1973)
  25. 수원백씨대동보편찬위원회, "수원백씨대동보3, In 인주공파" (1997)
  26. Sun Joo Kim, "Marginality and subversion in Korea : the Hong Kyŏngnae Rebellion of 1812", pp.21~34 (2007), University of Washington press
  27. "경국대전", ~
  28. "태종실록", ~
  29. "명종실록", ~
  30. "현종실록", ~
  31. "국조문과방목", ~
  32. "인조실록", ~
  33. "현종개수실록", ~
  34. "숙종실록", ~
  35. "승정원일기", ~
  36. "영조실록", ~
  37. "성종실록", ~
  38. "중종실록", ~
  39. "선조수정실록", ~
  40. "광해군일기", ~
  41. "조선왕조실록", ~
  42. "일성록", ~
  43. "선조실록", ~
  44. "효종실록", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)