南冥學派의 書院과 남명학파의 전개
Nammyeong School’s Seowon and Development of Nammyeong School
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are many ways to understand a school such as its academic contents, teacher-disciple relationship, regionality, and even political position. Aside from those paths that have been polished so far, this article attempts to understand Nammyeong School through ‘Seowon(書院)’. The possibility to understand Nammyeong School through Seowon can be found from the fact that during the latter period of Chosun, Seowon played roles as the regional base of that school. Like that, the school’s developmental process or activities were closely associated with Seowon. Thus, by figuring out in which period Seowon was built and how it was distributed by each of the schools or what figures were cultivated from it, we can understand the area of activities of a certain school and the characteristics shown in the developmental process. Therefore, the history of Seowon cannot be disregarded when we try to understand schools in the latter period of Chosun. Often, Nammyeong School is characterized by the tendency to understand and transmit the idea of respect (敬義) as Jo Sik (曹植)’s nuclear idea, few collections of works, very few records related with theoretical exploration, and the strong spirit of criticism on reality. Those features of Nammyeong School can be understood in association with the history of Seowon’s development in Nammyeong School, especially, the reason why Nammyeong School was not active about building Seowon, or the fact that the number of Seowon it had was far smaller than that of other schools. In particular, when we try to understand Nammyeong School through Seowon, we can find answers from Nammyeong School’s political status that was changed drastically after Injobanjeong and Musin Revolt (戊申亂) about the following questions: why were Seowon or Saaek Seowon intensively built before the 18th century,regionally, why could it not be freed from Gyeongsang woodo (慶尙右道) centering around the present Gyeongnam, why were all destroyed and abolished under Daewongun’s Command of Seowon Abolition completely, or why was the wide-range evil effect of repeated building less noticeable in Nammyeong School which can be easily found in other schools.
Abstract
There are many ways to understand a school such as its academic contents, teacher-disciple relationship, regionality, and even political position. Aside from those paths that have been polished so far, this article attempts to understand Nammyeong School through ‘Seowon(書院)’. The possibility to understand Nammyeong School through Seowon can be found from the fact that during the latter period of Chosun, Seowon played roles as the regional base of that school. Like that, the school’s developmental process or activities were closely associated with Seowon. Thus, by figuring out in which period Seowon was built and how it was distributed by each of the schools or what figures were cultivated from it, we can understand the area of activities of a certain school and the characteristics shown in the developmental process. Therefore, the history of Seowon cannot be disregarded when we try to understand schools in the latter period of Chosun. Often, Nammyeong School is characterized by the tendency to understand and transmit the idea of respect (敬義) as Jo Sik (曹植)’s nuclear idea, few collections of works, very few records related with theoretical exploration, and the strong spirit of criticism on reality. Those features of Nammyeong School can be understood in association with the history of Seowon’s development in Nammyeong School, especially, the reason why Nammyeong School was not active about building Seowon, or the fact that the number of Seowon it had was far smaller than that of other schools. In particular, when we try to understand Nammyeong School through Seowon, we can find answers from Nammyeong School’s political status that was changed drastically after Injobanjeong and Musin Revolt (戊申亂) about the following questions: why were Seowon or Saaek Seowon intensively built before the 18th century,regionally, why could it not be freed from Gyeongsang woodo (慶尙右道) centering around the present Gyeongnam, why were all destroyed and abolished under Daewongun’s Command of Seowon Abolition completely, or why was the wide-range evil effect of repeated building less noticeable in Nammyeong School which can be easily found in other schools.
참고문헌 (18)
- 鄭民秉, "箕疇遺集", ~
- 鄭萬朝, "朝鮮陞廡諸賢文選附院享錄" (1925), 朝鮮陞廡諸賢文選出版所
- 세종대왕기념사업회 편집부, "국역 증보문헌비고" (1994), 세종대왕기념사업회
- 김형재, "重刊典故文獻", 七葉窟書店
- 이수환, "조선후기 서원 연구" (2001), 일조각
- 이상필, "남명학파의 형성과 전개" (2005), 와우출판사
- 남명학연구원, "남명학파 연구의 신지평" (2008), 예문서원
- 한국사상사연구회, "조선유학의 학파들" (1996), 예문서원
- 이상해, "서원" (2004), 열화당
- 최완기, "한국의 서원" (1991), 대원사
- 창원대학교 경남학연구센터, "경남의 서원" (2008), 선인
- 전용우, "조선조 서원·사우에 대한 일고찰", 호서사학, (13) (1985), 호서사학회
- 박병련, "南冥學派 盛衰過程의 政治社會的 特性과 士林의 動向", 南冥學硏究, 16, pp.6~232 (2003), 경남문화연구원
- 이상필, "18세기 강우지역 남명학파의 분포와 동향", 남명학연구, 11 (2008), 경상대학교 남명학연구소
- 윤희면, "조선시대 서원정책과 서원의 설립 실태", 역사학보, (181), pp.65~98 (2004), 역사학회
- 김기주, "智異山圈의 書院과 祠宇, 그 현황과 특징", 남도문화연구, (22), pp.7~27 (2012), 남도문화연구소[DOI]
- 이수환, "영남서원의 자료 현황과 특징", 대구사학, 65 (2001), 대구사학회
- "한국민족문화대백과사전"[URL]
