북한 핵·일본인납치 문제 관련 기술의 분석
The Description of North Korean Nuclear Weapons and Abduction of Japanese Citizens by North Korea in the Japanese Textbooks
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
지난 8월 13일 북한과 일본은 중국 선양에서 일본인납치 문제의 재조사에 합의했다. 2002년 고이즈미 총리의 북한 방문과 납치자문제가 대두된 이래, 납치자문제는 북일관계의 최대 현안으로 떠올랐다. 90년대 이후 북일관계의 주요 문제는 북한 핵·미사일을 둘러싼 다자간 협상이었다. 본고는 2007년 개정발간된 일본 고교 역사교과서에서, 북한 핵·미사일 문제와 일본인납치자문제에 대한 기술과 내용을 분석하는 데 목적을 둔다. 분석 결과, 일본 고교 역사교과서 14종 가운데, 북한 관련 문제에 대해 관심을 보이고 기술한 교과서는 매우 적은 수에 불과하며, 그나마 특정 출판사에서 출간된 교과서에 편중되어 있다. 내용 역시 일본인납치에 대한 관심이 북한 핵·미사일 문제 보다 우선되고 있음을 알 수 있다. 일본인납치 문제를 기술한 교과서의 경우, 대개 이 문제가 일본의 대외적 위상에 손상을 주는 외교적 미해결 과제이자 자연재해나 경제불황에 버금가는 사회적 위협이 된다는 점을 강조하고 있다. 한편, 북한 핵 문제를 언급한 교과서는 북한 핵 문제의 본질적 측면과 일본에 대한 위협에 대한 기술 보다는, 북미간 제네바합의 과정과 최근 6자회담 경위를 간략히 설명하고 주변국들이 북한 핵을 관리하기 위해 노력하고 있다는 점만을 간략히 설명하는 데 그치고 있다. 일본 역사교과서는 지난 5년 간 북일관계가 일본인납치 문제로 인해 경색되고 있는 현실을 외면한 채, 최근 1년 사이에 6자회담을 통한 북한 핵문제 해결의 진전과 주변국들과의 관계를 제대로 반영하지 못하고 있다.
Abstract
North Korea and Japan agreed on the reexamination of the abduction issue on August 13th. In the 1990s, the main problems between North Korea and Japan were about the multilateral talks on the nuclear weapons and missiles which were being developed by North Korea. But since North Korea admitted the existence of the Japanese nationals who had been kidnapped a couple of decades ago when Koizumi visited Pyeongyang in 2002, the abduction issue has been the most crucial point in the diplomatic and domestic terms. This paper intends to analyse the contents dealing with the nuclear and missile issue and the abduction issue in the history textbooks for Japanese high school students, which were revised and published in 2007. I analysed fourteen textbooks published by seven publishing companies and found out that only four Japanese history books dealt with abduction issue and only one world history book explained about North Korea’s nuclear weapons. There was only one textbook which dealt with both abduction and nuclear issues at the same time and it was published by a certain publishing company. Other two textbooks mentioned the hereditary dictatorship and isolation of North Korea but there were no explanation about the nuclear issue or abduction issue. This means that all in all, the contents related to North Korea are given very little weight in the Japanese textbooks. Japanese textbooks put more emphasis on the abduction issue rather than nuclear weapons. According to the description of textbooks, the issue is an unsolved diplomatic subject that Japan is facing as a top priority and should be regarded as a social threat as well as the natural disaster or economic depression. These attitudes toward the issue reflect the strategy adopted by the Japanese conservative right wing. The fact that the North Korean leader Kim Jong’il admitted the abduction was a really shocking news to the Japanese people, who immediately got susceptible to collective victim mentality unlike their historical assailant status. To the rightists, the general antagonistic sentiment toward North Korea could work as advantageous environment to arouse crisis consciousness and patriotic agitation among the Japanese. On the other hand, the Japanese textbooks show relatively indifferent and passive attitude to the nuclear weapon issue compared to the abduction issue. Although Japan had excessively reacted to North Korean missiles and submarines for spying until the 1990s, nowadays textbooks only explain that Japan should pursue the resolution of the nuclear problem in the process of six-party talks. In the textbooks, there are little description on the essence of nuclear issue and its possibility of becoming a major threat to Japan. It is surprising that there is no mention about North Korea’s announcement that it already has nuclear weapons. Japanese history textbooks seem to turn away from the reality that the abduction issue has played as the biggest obstacle to the progress of the two countries relations which is much needed for both country, reflecting Japanese political background. Recently, there is a rapid progress in resolving the nuclear issue through six-party talks, especially talks between North Korea and the US. Those process have influenced on the agreement about reexamination of the abductees. Although the Japanese textbooks don’t include these recent progresses, we should carefully take note of the description in them and their possible change in the future.
참고문헌 (15)
- Adrian Beard, "Text and Contexts:Introducing Literature and Language Study" (2001), London:Routledge
- M. Celce-Murcia, "Dicourse analysis and grammar instruction", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, pp.135~151 (1991), Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
- "改訂版 日本史A", pp.256~257 (2007), 山川出版社
- 第一學習社, "改訂版 日本史A—人․くらし․未来", ~170 (2007)
- "新訂版 高校日本史B", pp.238~239 (2007), 実教出版社
- "高校日本史B", pp.~297 (2007), 山川出版社
- "改訂版 新世界史", pp.389~390 (2007), 山川出版社
- "新訂版 日本史B", pp.390~391 (2007), 実教出版社
- "新版 世界史A", pp.165~166 (2007), 実教出版社
- "新詳 世界史B", pp.266~267 (2007), 帝國書院社
- Eugene A. Matthews, "Essays - Japan’s New Nationalism - Ever since World War II", Foreign Affairs, 82(6), pp.74~90 (2003)
- 스티브 클레몬스, "일본인 납치사건과 일본의 신민족주의 부활", 극동문제, pp.~146 (2004), 극동문제연구소
- "特集, 日朝関係‘不正常’から‘正常’へ, 討論․北朝鮮はどこまで変ったのか", 世界, pp.~53 (2002)
- 佐藤勝巳, "北朝鮮, 恨の核戦略: 世界一貧しい強国の論理" (1993), 東京:光文社
- 日本防衛庁防衛研究所, "東アジア戦略概観" (2004), 東京
