신해혁명시기 민족주의의 대두와 ‘以字詮史’ 연구법의 형성
The Rise of Nationalism and the Formation of Research Method for Yi-zi-quan-shi(以字詮史) in the Period of the Revolution of 1911
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article mainly discussed about the rise of nationalism and the formation of research method for yi-zi-quan-shi(history explanation through letters) through the tripartite relationship among the history, language, and the race of the revolution period of 1911. The time of revolution of 1911 in Chinese history belongs in the innovation period for scholarship and thought. The modern nationalism that advocates the race as the greatest value was formed at this time. The Chinese intellectuals began to imagine an ethnic community since around 1903 when nationalism rose. The history, language as well as the letters were perceived as common denominators of racial components for them. The more the nationalism flourished, the higher the status of the language, letters and the history became. Liu Shi-Pei(劉師培) and Liang Qi-Chao(梁啓超) devised the research method for yi-zi-quan-shi, which investigates the ancient history through the language letters. The method of yi-zi-quan-shi was primarily utilized for the research of ancient history that supports the antiquity of the race. The results of yi-zi-quan-shi were mostly those that connect directly with establishment of the racial identity and construction of people's nation. The research method for yi-zi-quan-shi offered the place for communication where a variety of voices cross that will bring about the change of the history in the period of the revolution of 1911. In that place for communication, the cry for the overthrow of the Establishment as well as the publicity of thought enlightenment resounded. Moreover, several political powers contended with one another for the interpretation of the history through yi-zi-quan-shi. That was because, for them, the knowledge of history meant the power that determines the direction for the present that has been built upon the past as well as for the future that will be set up.
Abstract
This article mainly discussed about the rise of nationalism and the formation of research method for yi-zi-quan-shi(history explanation through letters) through the tripartite relationship among the history, language, and the race of the revolution period of 1911. The time of revolution of 1911 in Chinese history belongs in the innovation period for scholarship and thought. The modern nationalism that advocates the race as the greatest value was formed at this time. The Chinese intellectuals began to imagine an ethnic community since around 1903 when nationalism rose. The history, language as well as the letters were perceived as common denominators of racial components for them. The more the nationalism flourished, the higher the status of the language, letters and the history became. Liu Shi-Pei(劉師培) and Liang Qi-Chao(梁啓超) devised the research method for yi-zi-quan-shi, which investigates the ancient history through the language letters. The method of yi-zi-quan-shi was primarily utilized for the research of ancient history that supports the antiquity of the race. The results of yi-zi-quan-shi were mostly those that connect directly with establishment of the racial identity and construction of people's nation. The research method for yi-zi-quan-shi offered the place for communication where a variety of voices cross that will bring about the change of the history in the period of the revolution of 1911. In that place for communication, the cry for the overthrow of the Establishment as well as the publicity of thought enlightenment resounded. Moreover, several political powers contended with one another for the interpretation of the history through yi-zi-quan-shi. That was because, for them, the knowledge of history meant the power that determines the direction for the present that has been built upon the past as well as for the future that will be set up.
참고문헌 (83)
- "印度人之論國粹", 民報 第20號, ｢時評｣, 9~
- E. 갤러, "민족과 민족주의", pp.15~ (2009), 한반도국제대학원대학교출판부
- E.J. 홉스봄, "제국의 시대", pp.290~ (2007), 한길사
- E.J. 홉스봄, "1780년 이후의 민족과 민족주의", pp.25~ (1994), 창작과 비평사
- "警鐘日報"
- 顧頡剛, "當代中國史學", pp.130~, 龍門書店
- 裘廷梁, "論白話爲維新之本", 近代史資料, (2)통권 : 31, pp.120~ (1963)
- 金觀濤, "從‘天下’、‘萬國’到‘世界’", 二十一世紀, (4)통권 : 94, pp.40~53 (2006)
- 金觀濤, "觀念史硏究", pp.221~245 (2009), 中文大學出版社
- 金芳漢, "언어와 역사" (1998), 서울대학출판부
- 金衡鍾, "淸末 革命派의 ‘反滿’革命論과 ‘五族共和論’", 中國現代史硏究, (12), pp.10~18
- 羅志田, "淸季民初經學的邊緣化與史學的走向中心, in 權勢轉移", pp.303~341 (1999), 湖北人民出版社
- 那特硜, "政治學", pp.36~37 (1902), 廣智書局
- 도수희, "언어와 역사", 인문언어, 2(1), pp.75~92
- 都重萬, "劉師培對晩淸史學硏進的貢獻及影響", 박사, pp.1998
- 도중만, "劉師培의 初期 中·西學術會通 - 嚴復 西學과의 相關性을 中心으로 -", 중국사연구, (66), pp.135~170 (2010), 중국사학회
- 杜正勝, "古代社會與國家", pp.29~ (1981), 允晨文化
- 羅志田, "再論淸季民初經學的邊緣化與史學的走向中心, in 文化與歷史的追索", pp.461~495 (2009), 聯經出版事業有限公司
- 黎錦熙, "國語運動", pp.9~ (1922), 商務印書館
- 黎錦熙, "國語運動史綱", pp.94~ (2011), 商務印書館
- 馬建忠, "後序, in 馬氏文通", pp.1~3 (1967), 臺灣商務印書館
- 萬仕國, "劉申叔遺書補遺", pp.129~ (2008), 廣陵書社
- 박양신, "근대 일본에서의 ‘국민’ ‘민족’ 개념의 형성과 전개 ― nation 개념의 수용사 ―", 동양사학연구, (104), pp.235~265 (2008), 동양사학회
- 박찬승, "민족·민족주의", pp.65~77 (2010), 소화
- 伯蓋司, "譯書彙編 第1期", pp.1~
- 白話道人, "國民意見書, in 辛亥革命前十年間時論選集", pp.900~ (1978), 生活·讀書·新知三聯書店
- 本社, "章太炎全集", pp.366~367 (1985), 上海人民出版社
- 師培, "論中土文字有益于世, in 國粹學報 第4年第9號, ｢社說｣", pp.26~
- 申叔, "中國對外思想之變遷, in 江蘇 第9第10期合本, ｢學說門｣, ｢歷史｣", pp.6~
- 앙드레 슈미드, "제국 그 사이의 한국", pp.90~ (2007), 휴머니스트
- 앤더슨, "민족주의의 기원과 전파", pp.20~ (1991), 나남
- 앤드류 헤이우드, "정치학-현대정치의 이론과 실천", pp.208~218 (2010), 성균관대학교출판부
- 梁啓超, "國文語原解, in 飮氷室合集" (1989), 中華書局
- 楊守仁, "新湖南, in 晩淸革命文學", pp.76~ (1970), 經世書局
- 楊肅獻, "梁啓超與中國近代民族主義, in 晩淸革命文學", pp.125~127
- 嚴復, "譯餘贅言, in 群學肄言", pp.2~ (1920), 商務印書館
- 余英時, "中國近代思想史上的激進與保守, in 猶記風吹水上鱗", pp.217~ (1991), 三民書局
- 余英時, "中國現代的民族主義與知識份子, in 近代中國思想人物論-民族主義", pp.558~ (1985), 時報文化出版事業有限公司
- 余一, "民族主義論, in 浙江潮 第1期, ｢論說｣", pp.3~
- 倪海曙, "中國拼音文字運動史簡編", pp.32~35 (1948), 時代出版社
- 王明珂, "民族史的邊緣硏究, in 史學方法與歷史解釋", pp.87~ (2005), 中國大百科全書出版社
- 王汎森, "近代中國的線性歷史觀, in 近代中國的史家與史學", pp.62~74 (2008), 三聯書店
- 王憲明, "語言·飜譯與政治", pp.223~ (2005), 北京大學出版社
- 于洋, "論劉師培的 ‘以字詮史’觀", 廊坊師範學院學報(社會科學版), 25(6), pp.34~38 (2009)
- 雨塵子, "近世歐人之三大主義, in 新民叢報 第28期, ｢政治｣", pp.7~
- 劉師培, "｢論小學與社會學之關係, in 鏡鐘日報 1904年11月24號(第263號)", 鏡鐘日報 1904年11月24號(第263號)
- 劉師培, "中國民族志, in 劉申叔先生遺書", pp.1b~ (1923)
- 劉師培, "字詮自序, in 左盦集", pp.17b~18a
- 劉師培, "黃帝紀年說, in 黃帝魂", pp.1~ (1903), 新中華書社
- 劉師培, "中國民族志", pp.54a~54b
- 柳亞子, "民權主義! 民族主義!, in 柳亞子選集", pp.85~86 (1989), 人民出版社
- 柳亞子, "中國滅亡小史, in 柳亞子選集", pp.12~
- 飮氷室主人, "叙目, in 現今世界大勢論", pp.1~ (1903), 廣智書局
- 飮氷室主人, "梁任公年譜長編", pp.157~ (1977), 世界書局
- 이춘복, "개항과 청말 ‘民族國家’ 관념의 형성 - 國家史로서 근대 ‘中國史’의 탄생을 중심으로-", 중앙사론, (27), pp.47~85 (2008), 중앙사학연구소
- 이춘복, "청말 중국 근대 ‘民族’ 개념 담론 연구 -문화적 ‘民族’ 개념과 정치적 ‘國民’ 개념을 중심으로-", 중앙사론, (29), pp.131~174 (2009), 중앙사학연구소
- 任公, "國家思想變遷異同論, in 淸議報 第95冊, ｢本館論說｣"
- 任公, "滅國新法論, in 淸議報 第85冊, ｢本館論說｣", pp.1a~
- 임지현, "민족주의, in 서양의 지적 운동", pp.538~542 (1994), 지식산업사
- 작가미상, "國魂篇, in 浙江潮 第1期, ｢社說｣", pp.13~
- 작가미상, "論強權之說之發生, in 警鐘日報 1904年3月27號(第31號)"
- 작자미상, "論中國前途及國民應盡之責任, in 湖北學生界 第3期, ｢論說｣", pp.1~
- 작자미상, "民族主義之敎育, in 游學譯編 第10期, ｢敎育｣", pp.2~
- 張舜徽, "淸代揚州學記", pp.193~ (1962), 上海人民出版社
- 張汝倫, "現代中國思想硏究", pp.126~ (2001), 上海人民出版社
- 張灝, "中國近代思想史的轉型時代, in 時代的探索", pp.37~ (2004), 中央硏究院·聯經出版事業有限公司
- 田北湖, "國定文字私議, in 國粹學報 第4年第10號, ｢社說｣", pp.1a~
- 錢玄同, "黃帝紀年說按, 第54冊, ｢左盦外集｣", pp.3a~4b
- 鄭匡民, "梁啓超啓蒙思想的東學背景", pp.181~188 (2003), 上海書店出版社
- 鄭師渠, "晩淸國粹派-文化思想硏究", pp.138~ (1993), 北京師範大學出版社
- 精衛, "民族的國民, in 民報 제1호", pp.1~2
- 周光慶, "漢語與中國新文化啓蒙", pp.188~205 (1985), 東大圖書公司
- 重光, "警告我國民, in 覺民 月刊整理重排本", pp.15~ (1996), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 中國之新民, "論民族競爭之大勢, in 新民叢報 第2號"
- 中國之新民, "論民族競爭之大勢, in 新民叢報 第5號"
- 中國之新民, "新民說一, in 新民叢報 第1號"
- 中國之新民, "政治學大家伯倫知理之學說, in 新民叢報 第38·39合本"
- 湯志鈞, "章太炎年譜長編", pp.297~ (1979), 中華書局
- 太炎, "演說錄, in 民報 第6號", pp.9~
- 何九盈, "中國現代語言學史", pp.39~48 (1995), 廣東敎育出版社
- "黃帝者, 漢族之黃帝也. 以之紀年, 可以發漢族民族之感覺. 偉哉, 黃帝之功! 美哉, 漢族之民!", ~
- "國民報彙編의 ｢發刊詞｣", pp.1~ (1972), 中央文物供應社
- "左盦集", pp.17b~19b, 北京隆福寺修綆堂