본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

예수는 율법을 폐지하려고 했는가?

Did Jesus abolish the Law?

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

According to the doctrine of Christianity Jesus, the Son of God abolished the Judaism and founded the Christianity with one stroke. It is the nullification of the Law that is the symbol of his abolition of the Judaism. Jesus showed the worthlessness of the Law as he violated the rule of Sabbath and several ritual laws. But if we accept this doctrine as true we are faced with an inexplicable question. Peter and the followers of Jesus who participated in the Jerusalem Church observed strictly the Law. Why did the Jerusalem Church observed the Law in disregard of the teaching of Jesus. Marcion who took notice of this fact for the first time offered a strange hypothesis. According to this hypothesis Jesus abolished the Law. But the followers of Jesus backslided to Judaism after the death of Jesus. The modern scholars of theology such as F. C. Baur revived this theory of re-Judaization. The influence of this theory continued until now. Since the middle of 20th century several efforts were carried out to overcome this theory. The active and sincere study of Judaism changed the prejudiced view that Jews in the time of Jesus pursued the strict and formal legalism. For example E. P. Sanders showed that the 1st century Palestinian Jews did not believe in works righteousness. Especially the Pharisees, the opponents of Jesus tried to reinterpret the Law considering the living conditions of common people and to alleviate the burdens of the common people. We should interpret the acts and teachings of Jesus described in the New Testament in this new point of view. The contemporaries of Jesus did not think the acts of Jesus such as touching a leper as disregard for the Law. Because the Pharisees did not regard everything in the Torah as equally significant. Contrary to the common view they didn't stick to legalism but were interested in searching for fundamental truths in the Torah. So the leaders of Pharisees, such as Hillel and Akiva, regarded love for God and neighbors as the greatest principle of the Law. Jesus gave emphasis to the spirit of the law like these leaders. Therefore he didn't try to abolish but to perform the Law. The followers of Jesus knew the teachings of Jesus. Their observances of the Law in the early time of Jerusalem did not run counter to the teaching of Jesus. On the contrary because they did remember the teaching of Jesus on the Law, they could agree the opinion of St. Paul who argued the abolition of Law for the Gentiles.

Abstract

According to the doctrine of Christianity Jesus, the Son of God abolished the Judaism and founded the Christianity with one stroke. It is the nullification of the Law that is the symbol of his abolition of the Judaism. Jesus showed the worthlessness of the Law as he violated the rule of Sabbath and several ritual laws. But if we accept this doctrine as true we are faced with an inexplicable question. Peter and the followers of Jesus who participated in the Jerusalem Church observed strictly the Law. Why did the Jerusalem Church observed the Law in disregard of the teaching of Jesus. Marcion who took notice of this fact for the first time offered a strange hypothesis. According to this hypothesis Jesus abolished the Law. But the followers of Jesus backslided to Judaism after the death of Jesus. The modern scholars of theology such as F. C. Baur revived this theory of re-Judaization. The influence of this theory continued until now. Since the middle of 20th century several efforts were carried out to overcome this theory. The active and sincere study of Judaism changed the prejudiced view that Jews in the time of Jesus pursued the strict and formal legalism. For example E. P. Sanders showed that the 1st century Palestinian Jews did not believe in works righteousness. Especially the Pharisees, the opponents of Jesus tried to reinterpret the Law considering the living conditions of common people and to alleviate the burdens of the common people. We should interpret the acts and teachings of Jesus described in the New Testament in this new point of view. The contemporaries of Jesus did not think the acts of Jesus such as touching a leper as disregard for the Law. Because the Pharisees did not regard everything in the Torah as equally significant. Contrary to the common view they didn't stick to legalism but were interested in searching for fundamental truths in the Torah. So the leaders of Pharisees, such as Hillel and Akiva, regarded love for God and neighbors as the greatest principle of the Law. Jesus gave emphasis to the spirit of the law like these leaders. Therefore he didn't try to abolish but to perform the Law. The followers of Jesus knew the teachings of Jesus. Their observances of the Law in the early time of Jerusalem did not run counter to the teaching of Jesus. On the contrary because they did remember the teaching of Jesus on the Law, they could agree the opinion of St. Paul who argued the abolition of Law for the Gentiles.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 존 드레인, "성경의 탄생", pp.305~306 (2011), 옥당
  2. 서동수, "사도행전의 율법 이해-예루살렘사도칙령의신학적의미를중심으로", 신약논단, 14(2), pp.421~453 (2007), 한국신약학회
  3. E. C. Blackman, "Marcion and Hist Influence" (1948), Wipf & Stock
  4. Jeffrey J. Bütz, "The Brother of Jesus and the Lost Teachings of Christianity", pp.154~155 (2005), Inner Traditions
  5. F. C. Baur, "Paul : the Apostle of Jesus Christ", pp.7~ (2003), Hendrickson
  6. R. Bauckham, "James, Peter, and the Gentiles, In The Missions of James, Peter, and Paul" (2005), Brill
  7. James Dunn, "Judaizers, In A Dictionary of Biblical Interpretation", pp.370~371 (1990), Trinity Press
  8. 박찬웅, "기독교의 탄생", pp.84~85 (2009), 대한기독교서회
  9. 박찬웅, "기독교의 탄생", pp.138~140 (2009), 대한기독교서회
  10. Brad Young, "Paul : The Jewish Theologian", pp.75~76 (1997), Hendrickson
  11. 게리 윌스, "예수는 그렇게 가르치지 않았다", pp.116~ (2007), 돋을새김
  12. Hyam Maccoby, "Jesus the Pharisee" (2003), SCM
  13. John Bowker, "Jesus and the Pharisees", pp.30~31 (1973), Cambridge Univ. Press
  14. J. Neusner, "The Rabbinic Traditions about the Pharisees Before 70, vol. 1", pp.323~ (1971), E. J. Brill
  15. Elliot N. Dorff, "Love Your Neighbor and Yourself: A Jewish Approach to Modern Personal Ethics", pp.269~ (2006), Jewish Publication Society of America
  16. 최갑종, "최근의 예수 연구", pp.156~158 (1994), 기독교문서선교회
  17. E. P. Sanders, "Paul and Palestinian Judaism", pp.114~ (1977), Fortress Press
  18. John Bowker, "Jesus and the Pharisees", pp.30~31 (1973), Cambridge Univ. Press
  19. R. 불트만, "신약성서신학", pp.13~14 (1976), 성광문화사
  20. 존 도미닉 크로산, "역사적 예수", pp.428~429 (2000), 한국기독교연구소
  21. 로버트 펑크, "예수에게 솔직히", pp.311~ (1999), 한국기독교연구소
  22. Harvey Falk, "Jesus the Pharisee", pp.149~ (2003), Wipf & Stock
  23. 존 도미닉 크로산, "역사적 예수", pp.517~ (2000), 한국기독교연구소
  24. Martin Hengel, "T. Trapp. Saint Peter : The Underestimated Apostle", pp.52~65 (2006), William Eerdmans
  25. 정기문, "바리사이파와 예수의 율법 논쟁", 서양고대사연구, (29), pp.125~148 (2011), 한국서양고대역사문화학회
  26. B. H. Young, "Jesus : The Jewish Theologian", pp.106~109 (1995), Hendrickson
  27. J. Dominic Crossan, "In search of Paul", pp.23~24 (2004), HarperSanfrancisco
  28. Burton Mack, "The Christian Myth : Origins, Logic, Legacy", pp.59~ (2001), Continum

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)