본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

나사렛 예수의 법사상 - 특히 누가복음에 나타난 하나님 나라와 정의의 관점에서

The Jesus of Nazareth’s Thought of Law -Especially from a point of view concerning the Kingdom of God and Justice in the Luke

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Although the fact that Jesus was a thinker in Politics and Social Science was accepted by many scholars, Jesus being a theorist in law is quiet unfamiliar. However, despite the awkwardness, it is impossible to deny Jesus as a legal thinker. I find the key of the legal thoughts of Jesus from the fact that Jesus hailed from Nazareth. Also, both the Gospel of Mark (1:14-15) and Luke (4:18-19) and the Sermon on the Mount show the same key as well. In these, Jesus presented his legal thoughts regarding new social and political order. The main idea of these preaches was about the advent of the kingdom of God and actualization of justice. Jesus taught, realized, and achieved the prophet Isaiah¡¯s theme about the justice. Jesus¡¯ interest in justice led him to try to end immoral economical structure and rule, unfair violence, cut off from a community, and so on, and this is his legal thought that he wanted to address through his teachings and sermons. The way Jesus understand the Law is apocalyptic radicalism. This stressed not only unconditional obedience to God and legal good deeds, but also condemnation of hypocrisy and unrighteousness. An aggressive party, which was a contemporary of Jesus, also supported the radicalism. However, Jesus was more extreme about the concept of God¡¯s kingdom as well as applying these standards. However, this methodology is not political, resistant, and discriminative. The rule and goal of Jesus are based on the statement that ¡°the kingdom of God is not within this World.¡± For this reason, Jesus criticized the defenders of existing orders and an aggressive party supporting the use of violence as a mean to pursue the absolute justice of the new kingdom of God. Furthermore, Jesus was a general leveler. Jesus had a high level of interest in the poor, the sick, women, and foreigners, but his missionary work didn¡¯t exclude a specific group of people especially such as the Jews, men, and the rich. The fact that his work was toward everybody in a community was well shown.

Abstract

Although the fact that Jesus was a thinker in Politics and Social Science was accepted by many scholars, Jesus being a theorist in law is quiet unfamiliar. However, despite the awkwardness, it is impossible to deny Jesus as a legal thinker. I find the key of the legal thoughts of Jesus from the fact that Jesus hailed from Nazareth. Also, both the Gospel of Mark (1:14-15) and Luke (4:18-19) and the Sermon on the Mount show the same key as well. In these, Jesus presented his legal thoughts regarding new social and political order. The main idea of these preaches was about the advent of the kingdom of God and actualization of justice. Jesus taught, realized, and achieved the prophet Isaiah¡¯s theme about the justice. Jesus¡¯ interest in justice led him to try to end immoral economical structure and rule, unfair violence, cut off from a community, and so on, and this is his legal thought that he wanted to address through his teachings and sermons. The way Jesus understand the Law is apocalyptic radicalism. This stressed not only unconditional obedience to God and legal good deeds, but also condemnation of hypocrisy and unrighteousness. An aggressive party, which was a contemporary of Jesus, also supported the radicalism. However, Jesus was more extreme about the concept of God¡¯s kingdom as well as applying these standards. However, this methodology is not political, resistant, and discriminative. The rule and goal of Jesus are based on the statement that ¡°the kingdom of God is not within this World.¡± For this reason, Jesus criticized the defenders of existing orders and an aggressive party supporting the use of violence as a mean to pursue the absolute justice of the new kingdom of God. Furthermore, Jesus was a general leveler. Jesus had a high level of interest in the poor, the sick, women, and foreigners, but his missionary work didn¡¯t exclude a specific group of people especially such as the Jews, men, and the rich. The fact that his work was toward everybody in a community was well shown.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 게리 윌스, "예수는 그렇게 말하지 않았다" (2006), 돋을새김
  2. 오스카 쿨만, "국가와 하나님 나라" (1999), 여수룬
  3. 오스카 쿨만, "예수와 그 시대의 혁명가들", 신학사상, 11
  4. L. E. 엘리웃 빈즈, "갈릴리기독교" (1985), 대한기독교출판사
  5. 볼트만, "현대 역사적 예수논구" (1982), 종로서적
  6. 스탠리 하우어워스, "교회됨 (Community of Character)" (2011), 북코리아
  7. 옷도 베츠, "역사적 예수의 진실" (1978), 한국신학대학출판부
  8. R. J 카시디, "예수․정치․사회, In 누가복음연구 신학연구시리즈 2" (1983), 대한기독교 출판사
  9. E. 케제만, "역사적 예수 연구" (1982), 대한기독교서회
  10. 글렌 스타센, "하나님의 통치와 예수 따름의 윤리" (2011), 도서출판 대장간
  11. 존 하워드 요더, "예수의 정치학" (2007), 한국기독교학생회
  12. 존 하워드 요더, "근원적 혁명" (2011), 대장간
  13. 짐 위리스, "부러진 십자가-무엇을 따르고 무엇에 저항할 것인가" (2012), 아바서원
  14. 김균진, "예수의 죽음의 원인에 대한 신학적 해석", 현대와 신학, 21(1) (1996), 연세대학교
  15. 김균진, "예수의 십자가의 죽음에 대한 구원론적 해석", 신학논단, 24 (1996)
  16. 김종구, "민주적 기본질서와 상대주의 법철학", 검찰, 30 (1970)
  17. 문상희, "예수의 재판사 연구-산헤드린재판을 중심으로-", pp.1974
  18. 문상희, "예수의 재판연구, In 복음서 연구와 복음선포(5)"
  19. 박도현, "기독교인에게 평화는 가능할까?", 기독교사회윤리, 14, pp.69~94 (2007), 한국기독교사회윤리학회
  20. 박정근, "유대 및 로마 형사법에 비추어 본 예수 형사피고사건(1), (2)", 법정,1957, 9. 10, ~ (1957)
  21. 새세대 교회윤리연구소, "공공신학이란 무엇인가?" (2007), 새세대교회윤리연구소
  22. "공공신학 어떻게 실천할 것인가 ?" (2008), 북코리아
  23. 손삼석, "요한복음의 빌라도 재판기", 신앙과 삶, 3 (1999)
  24. 장로회신학대학교 교회와 사회연구부, "현대신학과 기독교 윤리" (2005), 예영커뮤니케이션
  25. 정연호, "도스또옙스끼의 까라마조프네 형제들과 불가코프의 거장과 마르가리따에 나 타난 성경이야기의 연구-대심문관 이야기와 빌라도 이야기를 중심으로-", 효성여대 연구논문집, 47 (1993)
  26. 최종고, "법사상사" (1992), 박영사
  27. 최종고, "법과 종교와 인간" (1981), 삼영사
  28. 최종고, "서양법제사" (1986), 박영사
  29. 허호익, "예수 그리스도 바로보기" (2003), 한들출판사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)