역사주의 이전의 역사주의자, 비코
Historicist before Historicism, Vico
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of the present essay is to prove that the eighteenth-century Italian philosopher Giambattista Vico was a historicist, avant la lettre. Although the German historians and philosophers of history of late nineteenth century established the purpose, object, and methods of historical discipline, and thus obtained the name of the founders of historicism, it was Vico who first paved the way for that nomenclature. His theory of verum ipsum factum, that is, the true and the made are the same, in particular, played a pivotal role in differentiating humanities from the natural science, a feat usually attributed to the German historicists like Wilhelm Dilthey, Wilhelm Windelband and Heinrich Rickert. Moreover, Vico's use of philological method anticipated that of the Verstehen, normally associated with Dilthey. To ascertain these points, this essay first scanned the European historiography roughly from positivism to historicism, and then went on to summarize the basic tenets of the main German historicists. It then clarified Vico's theory of verum ipsum factum, to show that it has elective affinity to the expositions of the German historicists. As a conclusion, it stated that although in Germany Vico scholarship went on its own sake to use Vico as a forerunner of German historicism, it is another example of the fecundity of the thought of Giambattista Vico.
Abstract
The aim of the present essay is to prove that the eighteenth-century Italian philosopher Giambattista Vico was a historicist, avant la lettre. Although the German historians and philosophers of history of late nineteenth century established the purpose, object, and methods of historical discipline, and thus obtained the name of the founders of historicism, it was Vico who first paved the way for that nomenclature. His theory of verum ipsum factum, that is, the true and the made are the same, in particular, played a pivotal role in differentiating humanities from the natural science, a feat usually attributed to the German historicists like Wilhelm Dilthey, Wilhelm Windelband and Heinrich Rickert. Moreover, Vico's use of philological method anticipated that of the Verstehen, normally associated with Dilthey. To ascertain these points, this essay first scanned the European historiography roughly from positivism to historicism, and then went on to summarize the basic tenets of the main German historicists. It then clarified Vico's theory of verum ipsum factum, to show that it has elective affinity to the expositions of the German historicists. As a conclusion, it stated that although in Germany Vico scholarship went on its own sake to use Vico as a forerunner of German historicism, it is another example of the fecundity of the thought of Giambattista Vico.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김현식, "역사주의, In 서양의 지적 운동", pp.511~ (1994), 지식산업사
- Michael Bentley, "Modern Historiography: An Introduction", pp.4~ (1999), Routledge
- François Guizot, "Histoire de la civilisation en France, In French Historians and Romanticism: Thierry, Guizot, the Saint-Simonians, Quuinet, Michelet", pp.84~ (1993), London
- Ernst Breisach, "Historiography: Ancient, Medieval and Modern", pp.275~278 (1983), The University of Chicago Press
- Henry Thomas Buckle, "History of Civilisation in England, In The Varieties of History: From Voltaire to the Present", pp.123~124 (1970), Macmillan
- Georg G. Iggers, "The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present", pp.111~ (1968), Wesleyan University Press
- Wilhelm Dilthey, "Die Geistige Welt", pp.144~ (1934), Leipzig
- Wilhelm Dilthey, "Pattern and Meaning in History", pp.67~ (1961), Harper & Row
- Hans-Georg Gadamer, "Philosophical Hermeneutics", pp.14~ (1976), University of California Press
- H. Stuart Hughes, "Consciousness and Society: The Reorientation of European Social Thought, 1890-1930", pp.189~ (1958), Vintage Press
- Thomas Goddard Bergin, "The New Science of Giambattista Vico", pp.331~ (1959), Cornell University Press
- Benedetto Croce, "Hamann e Vico", pp.309~315, Saggio sullo Hegel
- René Wellek, "The Supposed Influence of Vico on England and Scotland in the Eighteenth Century", Giambattista Vico: An International Symposium, pp.215~223 (1969), The Johns Hopkins Press
- Timothy Bahti, "Vico, Auerbach and Literary History, In Vico: Past and Present, vol. 2", pp.97~114 (1981), Humanities Press
- Hanook Cho, "For Michelet's Vico: An Interpretation of Michelet's Translation of Vico's Scienza Nuova", 박사, pp.1991
- Bruce Mazlish, "The Riddle of History: The Great Speculators from Vico to Freud", pp.26~ (1966), New York
- Friedrich Meinecke, "Historism", pp.49~ (1972), London
- Isaiah Berlin, "비코와 헤르더", pp.53~ (1997), 민음사
- Giorgio de Santillana, "Vico and Descartes, In Reflections on Men and Ideas", pp.207~ (1966), MIT Press
- Nancy S. Struever, "Vico, Foucault, and the Structure of Intimate Investigation", New Vico Studies, 2, pp.41~ (1984)