반대주주의 주식매수청구권의 문제점
The Issues on the Appraisal Right of Dissenting Shareholders
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to the view of majority, the company has obligation to pay price of dissenting shares within 2 months after the appraisal right being exercised by dissenting shareholders. The obligation is based on cash payment, which is under no-fault liability without culpa compensatio. This is not reasonable, so it is better for company to consult the price of dissenting shares after the appraisal right being exercised. Under this understanding the company will be exempted from no-fault liability, when he has made timely preparation for payment of price of dissenting shares. In this connection I will suggest revision of commercial law article 374.2 as follows. “The company should pay the fair price of dissenting shares suggested by the company within 2 months after agreement between the company and shareholder not being made. When the price is paid, the shares are considered to be transferred to the company.”For the listed non-voting shares, appraisal right is permitted in express provision. For the non-listed non-voting shares major view permits the appraisal right. In case of non-listed and non-voting shares, it is somewhat questionable whether the appraisal right should be given to the shareholders, who do not attend shareholders’ meeting after submitting his opposing opinion about the fundamental corporate change such as a merger and a disposition of assets etc. In this connection it is better, to give appraisal right to non-listed and non-voting shareholders also by express provision in commercial law. Under the express provision of commercial law, it is not clear whether the appraisal right could be withdrawn or not. I think opposing shareholders could withdraw the appraisal right within 20 days after general meeting. The reason is because the opposing shareholders could express their consent in the general meeting, although they have submitted their opposing opinion before the meeting. However after 20 days from the general meeting opposing shareholders could not withdraw the appraisal right without consent of the company, because the company should bear excessive burden such as fund refunding and preparation of general meeting etc. In any case the opposing shareholders could not withdraw the appraisal right after they accept the payment of share price from the company. In this connection I will suggest the revision of commercial law article 372.2 (1) as follows. “The opposing shareholders could not withdraw the appraisal right without consent of the company after 20 days from the general meeting.”
Abstract
According to the view of majority, the company has obligation to pay price of dissenting shares within 2 months after the appraisal right being exercised by dissenting shareholders. The obligation is based on cash payment, which is under no-fault liability without culpa compensatio. This is not reasonable, so it is better for company to consult the price of dissenting shares after the appraisal right being exercised. Under this understanding the company will be exempted from no-fault liability, when he has made timely preparation for payment of price of dissenting shares. In this connection I will suggest revision of commercial law article 374.2 as follows. “The company should pay the fair price of dissenting shares suggested by the company within 2 months after agreement between the company and shareholder not being made. When the price is paid, the shares are considered to be transferred to the company.”For the listed non-voting shares, appraisal right is permitted in express provision. For the non-listed non-voting shares major view permits the appraisal right. In case of non-listed and non-voting shares, it is somewhat questionable whether the appraisal right should be given to the shareholders, who do not attend shareholders’ meeting after submitting his opposing opinion about the fundamental corporate change such as a merger and a disposition of assets etc. In this connection it is better, to give appraisal right to non-listed and non-voting shareholders also by express provision in commercial law. Under the express provision of commercial law, it is not clear whether the appraisal right could be withdrawn or not. I think opposing shareholders could withdraw the appraisal right within 20 days after general meeting. The reason is because the opposing shareholders could express their consent in the general meeting, although they have submitted their opposing opinion before the meeting. However after 20 days from the general meeting opposing shareholders could not withdraw the appraisal right without consent of the company, because the company should bear excessive burden such as fund refunding and preparation of general meeting etc. In any case the opposing shareholders could not withdraw the appraisal right after they accept the payment of share price from the company. In this connection I will suggest the revision of commercial law article 372.2 (1) as follows. “The opposing shareholders could not withdraw the appraisal right without consent of the company after 20 days from the general meeting.”
참고문헌 (33)
- 강헌, "상법상 주식매수청구권제도의 문제점", 상사법연구, 21(2), pp.10~420 (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 권기범, "현행 주식매수청구권에 관한 몇 가지 문제점", 상사법연구, 7 (1989)
- 김건식, "미국회사법상 반대주주의 주식매수청구권", 서울대 법학, 34(3-4) (1993)
- 김동민, "會社分割에 있어서 分割反對株主의 株式買受請求權에 관한 小考", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.410~438 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 김성진, "반대주주의 주식매수청구권 행사시 상장법인 주식의 매수가격결정에 관한 연구 - 자본시장법 및 상법상의 주식매수청구권과 대법원 2011.10.13. 자 2008마264 결정을 중심으로 -", 경영법률, 23(3), pp.1~31 (2013), 한국경영법률학회
- 김진욱, "주식매수청구권제도 개선의 필요성 - 자본시장법상의 주식매수청구권 특례조항을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 24(3), pp.161~192 (2010), 한국기업법학회
- 상홍규, "1998년 개정상법상의 주식매수청구권에 관한 고찰", 연세법학연구, 5(2) (1998)
- 상홍규, "총회결의 반대주주의 주식매수청구권의 범위", 기업법연구, (3) (1998)
- 서규석, "주식매수청구권 행사시 매수가격에 관한 연구", 기업법연구, (4) (1999)
- 양기진, "반대주주의 주식매수청구권에 관한 연구", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.185~219 (2012), 한국기업법학회
- 양만식, "상법상 조직변경과 반대주주의 주식매수청구권 - 법원에 의한 공정한 가액산정과 관련하여 -", 경영법률, 23(4), pp.155~184 (2013), 한국경영법률학회
- 엄세용, "주식매수청구권 법제비교 및 개선방향 연구", 증권법연구, 14(2), pp.165~205 (2013), 한국증권법학회
- 오창석, "주식매수청구권의 행사와 매수가격결정에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 24, pp.307~329 (2010), 법학연구소
- 윤영신, "정관에 의한 주식양도제한 제도 개선에 관한 입법론- 주식매수청구권의 인정 여부를 중심으로 -", 중앙법학, 14(4), pp.179~204 (2012), 중앙법학회
- 이범찬, "정관에 의한 주식양도의 제한과 주식매수청구권", 한일법학연구, 15 (1996)
- 이성웅, "미국회사법상 주식매수청구권의 기능", 기업법연구, (8호) (2001)
- 이승철, "주식매수청구권에 관한 증권거래법 규정에 대한비판적 검토", 저스티스, (105), pp.81~103 (2008), 한국법학원
- 김건식, "주식회사법대계(1)" (2013), 법문사
- 임재연, "자본시장법" (2014), 박영사
- 정동윤, "개정상법상 주식매수청구권에 관하여", 법조, 45(11) (1996)
- 주기종, "주식매수청구권에 관한 소고", 청주대 「법학논총」, 31(2) (2009)
- 진태홍, "합병의 효율성과 주식매수청구권", 규제연구, 17(1), pp.111~150 (2008), 한국규제학회
- 최승재, "주식가치평가와 공정한 가액에 대한고찰-반대주주의 주식매수청구권을 중심으로", 연세 글로벌 비즈니스법학연구(YGBL), 2(1) (2010)
- 최준선, "형성권으로서의 주식매수청구권과 백지보충권에 관한 고찰", 기업법연구, 23(1), pp.9~30 (2009), 한국기업법학회
- 한상호, "주식매수청구권의 가격 설정 기준과 공정성에 관한 연구", 홍익법학, 14(3), pp.305~336 (2013), 법학연구소
- 황희동, "반대주주 주식매수청구권의 법적 성격과 회사의 매수의무에 대한 소고", 서울대 「법학평론」, 2 (2011)
- 北澤正啓, "會社法" (1998), 靑林出版
- 六戶善一, "新版註釋會社法 (5)" (1991), 有斐閣
- 岡田昌浩, "逐條解說會社法 (2)" (2008), 中央經濟社
- 鈴木忠一, "會社と訴訟 (上)" (1969), 會社と訴訟
- Lewis D. Solomon, "Corporation Examples and Explanations" (1999), Aspen Law & Business
- Robert W. Hamilton, "Cases and Materials on Corporation" (1998), West Group
- Robert W. Hamilton, "The Law of Corporations in a Nutshell" (1996), West Publishing Co
