상법상 경업금지 법리의 새로운 전개
A New Development of Legal Principles Concerning Covenants not to Compete in View of Commercial Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Legal principle concerning covenants not to compete regulated in commercial law is a liability of nonperformance imposed on those who have a confident relation with company owner or a company. A covenant not to compete contained in commercial law is scattered in general provision of law on commerce, law on commercial activity, and law on company, but the coverage of competitive business prohibition is regulated differently, depending on applicable matters. The liability of competitive business prohibition regulated in commercial law, without any exception, is applicable to contract relation during employment or during the terms of office, not to the contract relation after retirement or term of office. In addition, covenant not to compete or promise competitive business prohibition by a contract which can be recognized by interpretation is imposed on the basis of trust relation. Especially, promise competitive business prohibition is regulated by a contract on the basis of partners’ self-governing after term of office or retirement without a special guideline. The regulation of competitive business prohibition, secured by constitution, restricts freedom of business or selection of vocation. So, such limitation itself must be not only clear, but also it must be narrowly tailored. A covenant not to compete is composed of competitive business transaction prohibition, non-competition prohibition, and concurrent position prohibition. Competitive business prohibition of commercial user includes competitive business transaction prohibition and concurrent position prohibition. In case somebody infringes a regulation, the right of intervention, the right of compensation claim, and the right of contract termination, methods of deliverance, can be invoked by a counterpart. Competitive business prohibition of business transferrer regulates competitive business transaction prohibition. In case of a violation of the regulation, the counterpart can claim competitive business cease and compensation. Competitive business prohibition in the law of agents, limited partnership, and companies regulates competitive business transaction prohibition and concurrent position prohibition. If somebody infringes a regulation, the counterpart can claim the right of intervention and compensation. As mentioned above, this study investigated that competitive business prohibition regulated in many areas needs unity in an area and that if somebody infringes the regulation, the counterpart has to be given the right of intervention and compensation selectively.
Abstract
Legal principle concerning covenants not to compete regulated in commercial law is a liability of nonperformance imposed on those who have a confident relation with company owner or a company. A covenant not to compete contained in commercial law is scattered in general provision of law on commerce, law on commercial activity, and law on company, but the coverage of competitive business prohibition is regulated differently, depending on applicable matters. The liability of competitive business prohibition regulated in commercial law, without any exception, is applicable to contract relation during employment or during the terms of office, not to the contract relation after retirement or term of office. In addition, covenant not to compete or promise competitive business prohibition by a contract which can be recognized by interpretation is imposed on the basis of trust relation. Especially, promise competitive business prohibition is regulated by a contract on the basis of partners’ self-governing after term of office or retirement without a special guideline. The regulation of competitive business prohibition, secured by constitution, restricts freedom of business or selection of vocation. So, such limitation itself must be not only clear, but also it must be narrowly tailored. A covenant not to compete is composed of competitive business transaction prohibition, non-competition prohibition, and concurrent position prohibition. Competitive business prohibition of commercial user includes competitive business transaction prohibition and concurrent position prohibition. In case somebody infringes a regulation, the right of intervention, the right of compensation claim, and the right of contract termination, methods of deliverance, can be invoked by a counterpart. Competitive business prohibition of business transferrer regulates competitive business transaction prohibition. In case of a violation of the regulation, the counterpart can claim competitive business cease and compensation. Competitive business prohibition in the law of agents, limited partnership, and companies regulates competitive business transaction prohibition and concurrent position prohibition. If somebody infringes a regulation, the counterpart can claim the right of intervention and compensation. As mentioned above, this study investigated that competitive business prohibition regulated in many areas needs unity in an area and that if somebody infringes the regulation, the counterpart has to be given the right of intervention and compensation selectively.
참고문헌 (61)
- 권기범, "현대회사법론" (2012), 삼영사
- 서돈각, "상법강의(상) 제사전정" (1999), 법문사
- 손주찬, "상법(상)" (2004), 박영사
- 손주찬, "주석상법 총칙·상행위(1)" (2003), 한국사법행정학회
- 송옥렬, "상법강의" (2011), 홍문사
- 이철송, "상법총칙·상행위법" (2010), 박영사
- 이철송, "회사법" (2014), 박영사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
- 정희철, "상법원론(상)" (1989), 박영사
- 채이식, "상법강의(상)" (1996), 박영사
- 최준선, "상법총칙·상행위법" (2013), 삼영사
- 최준선, "회사법 제9판" (2014), 삼영사
- 한국상사법학회, "주식회사법대계 II" (2013), 법문사
- 강대섭, "이사가 다른 회사의 지배주주가 된 경우 경업금지의무 위반 여부- 대법원 2013. 9. 12. 선고, 2011다57869 판결을 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 55(1), pp.245~271 (2014), 법학연구소
- 권오상, "경업금지약정의 유효요건 및 약정 위반시 손해배상액의 감액", 노동법학, (47) (2013)
- 권재열, "모회사의 이사에 대한 자회사의 실권주 배정에 관련된 몇 가지 쟁점의 검토 - 대법원 2013.9.12. 선고 2011다57869 판결을 대상으로 하여 -", 선진상사법률연구, (65), pp.12~46 (2014), 법무부
- 권재열, "회사기회의법리 －2007년 2월 조정된 상법개정안의 비교법적 검토－", 상사법연구, 25(4), pp.71~112 (2007), 한국상사법학회
- 권종호, "일본 상사법의 개별입법화 동향", 기업법연구, 23(4), pp.169~192 (2009), 한국기업법학회
- 김교창, "이사의 충실의무와 경업금지", 법조, 28(8) (1979), 법조협회
- 김상규, "지배인의 법적 지위", 법학논총, 11 (1994)
- -, "경제법연구", 2012, 277~300, pp.한국경제법학회
- 김성태, "영업양도의 효과", 고시연구, 23(6) (1996), 고시연구사
- 김종호, "영업양도의 법률관계(3)-영업양도의 효과 I", 경영법무, (56) (1998), 한국경영법무연구소
- 김현철, "영업양도와 경업금지의무 – 대법원 2009. 9. 14.자 2009마1136 결정", 판례연구, 23 (2012), 부산판례연구회
- 나종갑, "영업비밀유지의무와 전직금지기간", 상사판례연구, 22(4), pp.173~220 (2009), 한국상사판례학회
- 노상헌, "일본의 지적 재산권 강화와 근로자의 의무에 관한 법적 쟁점", 기업법연구, 20(3), pp.405~436 (2006), 한국기업법학회
- 박재헌, "영업비밀 보호를 위한 경업금지의 허용성에 관련된 요소 <상>", 저스티스, 2012(131), pp.128~172 (2012), 한국법학원[DOI]
- 박형준, "경업금지와 영업방해, 「조세」 273호" (2011), 영화조세통람
- 신권철, "근로자의 경업금지의무", 노동법연구, (18), pp.221~265 (2005), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 유시창, "가맹사업거래에 있어서 경업금지 약정", 경희법학, 45(3), pp.448~507 (2010), 법학연구소
- 유영일, "이사의 충실의무의 체계화에 관한 연구", 상사판례연구, 26(4), pp.311~359 (2013), 한국상사판례학회
- 이달휴, "근로자의 경업금지의무와 계약", 노동법학, (34), pp.33~62 (2010), 한국노동법학회
- 이동진, "과도하게 긴 계약상 경업금지기간에 대한 규율 - 근로계약상 퇴직 후 경업금지조항을 중심으로 -", 민사법학, 54(1), pp.31~81 (2011), 한국민사법학회
- 이병운, "기업의 경영정보 보호와 근로계약상의 의무", 기업법연구, 19(3), pp.479~506 (2005), 한국기업법학회
- 이성호, "근로자에 대한 경업금지약정의 효력과 전직금지가처분의 허용 여부", 저스티스, 34(4)통권 : 62 (2001), 한국법학원
- 이중기, "이사, 상업사용인의 회사기회유용과 경업금지의무 위반: 이사, 상업사용인의 충실의무위반에 대한 개입권의 행사가능성을 중심으로", 홍익법학, 8(3), pp.225~256 (2007), 법학연구소
- 이철수, "독일법상 충실의무(Treuepflicht)의 역사적 전개와 구체적 법리", 법학논집, 9(1), pp.187~228 (2004), 법학연구소
- 임재호, "商法總則․商行爲法 判例의 形成과 變遷", 상사판례연구, 23(1), pp.3~61 (2010), 한국상사판례학회
- 임홍근, "대리상에 관한 연구", 성균관법학, (2) (1988), 성균관대학교 법학연구소
- 정경영, "상법총칙, 상행위편 개정의견", 상사법연구, 24(2) (2005), 한국상사법학회
- 정연희, "인터넷상 영업․재산의 양도에 따른 법적 문제에 관한 고찰", 법학논고, (43), pp.229~254 (2013), 법학연구원
- 정용상, "개정상법총칙·상행위법상의 논점", 법학연구, 7 (1996), 부산외국어대학교 법학연구소
- 정찬형, "현대법의 이론과 실제, 금랑 김철수교수 화갑기념논문집" (1993)
- 정호열, "해임이사의 동종영업 종사에 따르는 법적 문제", 성균관법학, 13(1) (2001), 성균관대학교 법학연구소
- 진도왕, "방송산업에서의 경업금지계약에 관한 고찰 -미국의 판례와 이론을 중심으로-", 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법, 15(4), pp.287~312 (2012), 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회
- 진도왕, "경업금지계약의 유효성 판단기준으로서 경쟁 - 우리 민법 제103조와 미국에서의 논의를 중심으로 -", 민사법학, 61, pp.167~199 (2012), 한국민사법학회
- 陳志, "중국 경업금지제도에 관한 연구", 석사, 법학, pp.2008
- 최기원, "상법개정안의 문제점(중)", 법률신문, 6(2319) (1994)
- 최영진, "근로계약상의 부수적 의무에 관한 고찰 －영국, 독일, 미국을 중심으로－", 한양법학, (24), pp.55~81 (2008), 한양법학회
- 최영홍, "경업금지특약의 유효요건 － 미국 가맹계약을 중심으로 －", 상사법연구, 27(1), pp.123~154 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 최완진, "고시계" (1999), 고시계사
- 최준선, "이사의 경업금지의무", 고시계 (1996), 고시계사
- ALI, "Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommen- dations, Vol. 1" (1994), American Law Institute Publishers
- Canaris, Claus-Wilhelm, "Handelsrecht" (1995), C. H. Beck
- Oetker, Hartmut, "Handelsrecht" (1998), Springer
- Schmidt, Karsten, "Handelsrecht" (1999), Carl Heymanns Verlag KG
- Schmidt, Karsten, "Gesellschaftsrecht" (1997), Carl Heymanns Verlag KG
- Zöllner, "Kölner Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz, Bd. II 1. Lieferung" (2009), Carl Heymanns Verlag
- 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法" (2006), 有斐閣
- 北村雅史, "取締役의の 競業避止義務" (2000), 有斐閣
- 酒卷俊雄, "商法總則 商行爲法" (2005), 成文堂