본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현행 우리나라 영화사전심의제도의 법적 고찰- 현행 등급분류제의 문제점 및 그 개선방안을 포함하여 -

A legal study on the current korean film pre-review system - including the incompleteness of the current film-rating system and that solution -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This paper deals with the legal analysis of the current korean film pre-review system(that is, the film-rating system), performed by the civil organization, KMRB(Korea Media Rating Board). This system is operated mainly based on 「PROMOTION OF THE MOTION PICTURES AND VIDEO PRODUCTS ACT」, 「ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE PROMOTION OF THE MOTION PICTURES AND VIDEO PRODUCTS ACT」, 「MEDIA RATING CRITERIA (published by KMRB)」. The current korean film pre-review system is not a pre-permission system(censorship) but a rating system, composed of 5 rates (that is, ① all the ages allowed, ② above 12 years, ③ above 15 years, ④ above 18 years or high school students, ⑤ screened limitedly). Looking into the korean rating system in detail, we come to know 「PROMOTION OF THE MOTION PICTURES AND VIDEO PRODUCTS ACT」§29 ② is a very incomplete provision, containing not only the unclearness of each rate’s definition (except the ‘screened limitedly’ rate) but also a “editorial failure” concerning the definition of the ‘screened limitedly’ rate. And it is desirable that we must distinguish between political problems and obscenity or violence for the better juvenile protection, purposed by the film pre-review system. Therefore, as far as the pure entertainment movies are concerned, the special rating system is needed, where to these movies the stricter criteria will be applied than to the other kinds of movies. We must reflect these points in the coming revisions of the relevant statues.

Abstract

This paper deals with the legal analysis of the current korean film pre-review system(that is, the film-rating system), performed by the civil organization, KMRB(Korea Media Rating Board). This system is operated mainly based on 「PROMOTION OF THE MOTION PICTURES AND VIDEO PRODUCTS ACT」, 「ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE PROMOTION OF THE MOTION PICTURES AND VIDEO PRODUCTS ACT」, 「MEDIA RATING CRITERIA (published by KMRB)」. The current korean film pre-review system is not a pre-permission system(censorship) but a rating system, composed of 5 rates (that is, ① all the ages allowed, ② above 12 years, ③ above 15 years, ④ above 18 years or high school students, ⑤ screened limitedly). Looking into the korean rating system in detail, we come to know 「PROMOTION OF THE MOTION PICTURES AND VIDEO PRODUCTS ACT」§29 ② is a very incomplete provision, containing not only the unclearness of each rate’s definition (except the ‘screened limitedly’ rate) but also a “editorial failure” concerning the definition of the ‘screened limitedly’ rate. And it is desirable that we must distinguish between political problems and obscenity or violence for the better juvenile protection, purposed by the film pre-review system. Therefore, as far as the pure entertainment movies are concerned, the special rating system is needed, where to these movies the stricter criteria will be applied than to the other kinds of movies. We must reflect these points in the coming revisions of the relevant statues.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 배수경, "한국 영화검열제도의 변천에 관한 연구 : 정권별 특징과 심의기구의 변화를 중심으로", 석사, 영화이론, pp.2005
  2. 최승준, "표현의 자유의 제한에 관한 연구", 석사, 헌법, pp.2010
  3. 양건, "헌법상 검열금지규정의 해석 -헌법재판소의 영화사전심의 위헌 결정에 대한 비판적 분석과 새로운 해석의 제시", 법학논총, 15 (1998), 한양대학교 법학연구소
  4. 김욱, "영화에서의 사전검열금지의 원칙과 표현의 자유의 한계 - 2000헌가9 위헌법률심판제청사건에 부쳐 -", 민주법학, (19) (2001), 민주주의법학연구회
  5. 양영철, "우리영화 심의제도에 대한 논의", 영화연구, (37), pp.227~249 (2008), 한국영화학회
  6. 문재완, "음란과 헌법상 표현의 자유의 보호영역 - 헌재 2009. 5. 28. 2007헌바83결정을 중심으로 -", 언론과 법, 8(2), pp.293~329 (2009), (사)한국언론법학회
  7. 이인호, "현행 영화검열법에 대한 비판적 분석", 법학논문집, 28(1) (2004), 중앙대학교 법학연구소
  8. 황창근, "영화등급분류제도의 개선 방향 -제한상영가 등급을 중심으로-", 세계헌법연구, 14(3), pp.495~526 (2008), 세계헌법학회한국학회
  9. 한위수, "영화등급제와 표현의 자유 - 특히 제한상영가 등급과 관련하여 -", 가톨릭 법학, (1) (2003), 가톨릭대학교 법학연구소
  10. 최한준, "우리나라 영화사전심의제도 변천의 법적 고찰", 경영법률, 22(4), pp.431~456 (2012), 한국경영법률학회[DOI]
  11. "국가법령정보센터 사이트"[URL]
  12. "영상물등급위원회 사이트"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)