16세기 遺逸의 方外人的 性向에 관한 고찰
A consideration of the propensity to a marginal inclination of Yuyil(遺逸) in the 16th century
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the scholars' massacre period, Yuyil didn't live peacefully and bounded by the realities of life. So, they describe as a departure person from a Confucian category. In spite of that, the propensity to a marginal inclination of Yuyil apparently differs from Bangoeyin's. Yuyil didn't find their way out of the anguished life's realities keeping a confrontation between the ego and the actual. But the reason why excessively exaggerating them as Bangoeyin is that discontent to a real life and doing things that surprise people were showed by their disciple. Sarim(士林) in the 16th century hold more prominent position in an academic standard's superiority and spiritual culture than the power group of the royal court. This phenomena were showed by Seogyeongdeok(徐敬德) and his disciple. Seogyeongdeok gains control of himself in both an academic standard and spiritual culture. But his disciple lacks of spiritual culture. They play things that surprise people. In this point, they are similar to Bangoeyin. Paid attention to a marginal inclination of Yuyil in the 16th century is an erudite academic standard. They accumulate a thorough moral culture, but they didn't free from problems concerning public welfare. For the public welfare, they hold an admission position except for Sung Confucianism. Bangoeyin's inclination which chanced upon to them seems to be jumping on this flew. They are defined as Toecheoyin who equipping with a thorough moral culture and an aspect of a moralist.
Abstract
In the scholars' massacre period, Yuyil didn't live peacefully and bounded by the realities of life. So, they describe as a departure person from a Confucian category. In spite of that, the propensity to a marginal inclination of Yuyil apparently differs from Bangoeyin's. Yuyil didn't find their way out of the anguished life's realities keeping a confrontation between the ego and the actual. But the reason why excessively exaggerating them as Bangoeyin is that discontent to a real life and doing things that surprise people were showed by their disciple. Sarim(士林) in the 16th century hold more prominent position in an academic standard's superiority and spiritual culture than the power group of the royal court. This phenomena were showed by Seogyeongdeok(徐敬德) and his disciple. Seogyeongdeok gains control of himself in both an academic standard and spiritual culture. But his disciple lacks of spiritual culture. They play things that surprise people. In this point, they are similar to Bangoeyin. Paid attention to a marginal inclination of Yuyil in the 16th century is an erudite academic standard. They accumulate a thorough moral culture, but they didn't free from problems concerning public welfare. For the public welfare, they hold an admission position except for Sung Confucianism. Bangoeyin's inclination which chanced upon to them seems to be jumping on this flew. They are defined as Toecheoyin who equipping with a thorough moral culture and an aspect of a moralist.
참고문헌 (32)
- "『明宗實錄』ㆍ『宣祖修正實錄』ㆍ『光海君日記』ㆍ『練藜室記述』", ~
- 朴枝華, "守庵遺稿", 한국고전번역원
- 卞季良, "春亭集", 한국고전번역원
- 徐敬德, "花潭集", 한국고전번역원
- 成汝信, "浮査集", 한국고전번역원
- 成運, "大谷集", 한국고전번역원
- 成悌元, "『東洲集』, 淸道의 勒坪에서 간행, 1906년", ~ (1906)
- 李植, "澤堂集", 한국고전번역원
- 李珥, "栗谷全書", 한국고전번역원
- 李之涵, "土亭遺稿", 한국고전번역원
- 李恒, "一齋集", 한국고전번역원
- 李滉, "退溪集", 한국고전번역원
- 李希顔, "『黃江實記』, 1900년 간행", ~ (1900)
- 林芸, "瞻慕堂集", 한국고전번역원
- 林薰, "葛川集", 한국고전번역원
- 曺植, "南冥集", 한국고전번역원
- 趙昱, "龍門集", 한국고전번역원
- 강정화, "東洲 成悌元의 學問性向과 處世觀", 南冥學硏究, (17), pp.215~250 (2004), 경남문화연구원
- 강정화, "16세기 遺逸文學 硏究", 박사, pp.2006
- 강정화, "大谷 成運 硏究", 석사, pp.1994
- 금장태, "朝鮮前期의 儒學思想" (2003), 서울대 출판부
- 김문준, "東洲 成悌元의 生涯와 道學精神", 동서철학연구, (24), pp.173~194 (2002), 한국동서철학회
- 신병주, "南冥學派와 花潭學派 硏究" (2000), 일지사
- 윤남한, "朝鮮時代의 陽明學 硏究" (1986), 集文堂
- 윤주필, "26史에 나타난 방외인전의 전개 양상(1)", 중국어문학논집, pp.327~349 (1999), 중국어문학연구회
- 윤주필, "方外人文學의 전통(Ⅰ)", 한국한문학연구, 17, pp.259~291 (1994), 한국한문학회
- 이상필, "남명학파의 형성과 전개" (2005), 와우출판사
- 임형택, "조선전기 문인유형과 방외인문학 in: 한국문학연구입문", pp.244~252 (1982), 지식산업사
- 정학성, "조선전기의 비판적 문학 in: 민족문학사 강좌(상)", pp.135~161 (1995), 창작과비평사
- 최석기, "南冥의 ‘神明舍圖’․‘神明舍銘’에 대하여", 南冥學硏究, 4, pp.155~193 (1994), 경상대 남명학연구소
- 최석기, "忘憂堂 郭再祐의 節義活動", 南冥學硏究, 6, pp.103~142 (1996), 경상대학교 남명학연구소
- 황위주, "方外人文學의 槪念과 性格", 국어교육연구, 18, pp.109~125 (1986), 국어교육학회
