본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한문과 학교문법서의 서술 방향 모색 -2007 개정교육과정 중고등학교 해설서(한문) 강의 사례를 중심으로-

A Grope for the Direction of a Future School Grammar Text in the Education of Korean Classical Chinese -Focusing on Education Example for the 2007 Revised Curriculum Guide of Korean Classical Chinese-

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

We ascertain that the 2007 Revised Curriculum Guide of Korean Classical Chinese has reflected the academic research performance of the school grammar of Korean Classical Chinese so far. Based on the various critical recognition of one college student group majoring in Korean Classical Chinese education toward the contents of the Curriculum, which had been researched during the lecture in 2011, this essay endeavors to devise alternative proposals for their critical queries. We categorize our suggestions into four parts. First, the students’ grammatical recognition could be enhanced by presenting the factors grounded on the general grammar recognition and the distinctive grammatical elements of Korean Classical Chinese, respectively, in the intro. Second, the preciseness of grammatical description could increase the effectiveness of the students’ grammatical grasp, because the survey shows that the students express their difficulties of understanding when the grammatical descriptions are ambiguous. Third, the archetypal and obvious example sentences help the students understand grammatical contents more directly. we find that when an example sentence deviates from the school text or the students’ academic standards, the students’ academic efficiency decreases. Forth, Some grammatical issues could be resolved by additional description of grammatical elements, such as causative use of verbs, solo & multi functional aspects of mood particles, which are not included in the 2007 Revised Curriculum Guide. We hope that our research and suggestions to the students’ grammatical recognition could have a certain value for the compilation of a future school grammar text.

Abstract

We ascertain that the 2007 Revised Curriculum Guide of Korean Classical Chinese has reflected the academic research performance of the school grammar of Korean Classical Chinese so far. Based on the various critical recognition of one college student group majoring in Korean Classical Chinese education toward the contents of the Curriculum, which had been researched during the lecture in 2011, this essay endeavors to devise alternative proposals for their critical queries. We categorize our suggestions into four parts. First, the students’ grammatical recognition could be enhanced by presenting the factors grounded on the general grammar recognition and the distinctive grammatical elements of Korean Classical Chinese, respectively, in the intro. Second, the preciseness of grammatical description could increase the effectiveness of the students’ grammatical grasp, because the survey shows that the students express their difficulties of understanding when the grammatical descriptions are ambiguous. Third, the archetypal and obvious example sentences help the students understand grammatical contents more directly. we find that when an example sentence deviates from the school text or the students’ academic standards, the students’ academic efficiency decreases. Forth, Some grammatical issues could be resolved by additional description of grammatical elements, such as causative use of verbs, solo & multi functional aspects of mood particles, which are not included in the 2007 Revised Curriculum Guide. We hope that our research and suggestions to the students’ grammatical recognition could have a certain value for the compilation of a future school grammar text.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 고등학교 교육과정 해설⑬-한문, "교육과학기술부", 교육과학기술부, ~ (2008)
  2. 중학교 교육과정 해설(V)-외국어(영어), 재량 활동, 한문, 정보, 환경, 생활 외국어, "교육과학기술부", 교육과학기술부, ~ (2008)
  3. 김성중, "≪馬氏文通≫ 參合助字 층차 분석에 대한 小考", 중국어문논총, (40), pp.43~54 (2009), 중국어문연구회
  4. 이군선, "한문과 문법 연구의 동향과 과제", 漢文敎育硏究, (37), pp.217~240 (2011), 한국한문교육학회
  5. 이익섭, "한국어 문법" (2010), 서울대학교출판부
  6. 2011 한문과 교육과정 개정 시안 연구 개발, "장호성", 한국교육과정평가원, ~ (2011)
  7. 郭錫良, "古代漢語(上下)" (1999), 商務印書館
  8. 楊伯峻, "古漢語語法及其發展 修訂本(上下)" (2001), 語文出版社
  9. 殷國光, "古代漢語" (2003), 中國人民大學出版社
  10. 張雙棣, "古代漢語知識敎程" (2002), 北京大學出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)