본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

「廣寒樓記」 評批 분석(1) -小广主人의 序文과 讀法-

Analysis of the Critical Commentary of Gwanghanru-gi -Soeom-juin's Preface and Reading-

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Gwanghanru-gi廣寒樓記 is an adaptation in classical Chinese from Chunhyang-jeon, Korean classical novel, written by Susan水山 in the mid of 19th century. This work was noted in that it had a critical commentary評批, which was a unique way of criticism in the Middle ages of East Asia. As the main critic of Gwanghanru-gi is Soeom-juin小广主人, I analyzed Soeom-juin's preface and way of reading in the critical commentary of Gwanghanru-gi. After I analyzed Soeom-juin's preface, I could not help recognizing that Soeom-juin had a poor understanding about Hsihsiang-chi西廂記 and the drama or the novel in China. Though Soeom-juin asserted that Gwanghanru-gi was superior to Hsihsiang-chi, he had no ability of comparing Gwanghanru-gi with Hsihsiang-chi because he read not Hsihsiang-chi but Yingying-zhuan鶯鶯傳, which was a basis of Hsihsiang-chi. Meanwhile, most of Soeom-juin's way of reading was the imitation or variation of Jin Shengtan金聖嘆's critical commentary on Hsihsiang-chi. Therefore I concluded that Soeom-juin's critical commentary, as far as about preface and reading, was built on the superficial view with a lack of profound understanding about Hsihsiang-chi and Jin Shengtan's criticism.

Abstract

Gwanghanru-gi廣寒樓記 is an adaptation in classical Chinese from Chunhyang-jeon, Korean classical novel, written by Susan水山 in the mid of 19th century. This work was noted in that it had a critical commentary評批, which was a unique way of criticism in the Middle ages of East Asia. As the main critic of Gwanghanru-gi is Soeom-juin小广主人, I analyzed Soeom-juin's preface and way of reading in the critical commentary of Gwanghanru-gi. After I analyzed Soeom-juin's preface, I could not help recognizing that Soeom-juin had a poor understanding about Hsihsiang-chi西廂記 and the drama or the novel in China. Though Soeom-juin asserted that Gwanghanru-gi was superior to Hsihsiang-chi, he had no ability of comparing Gwanghanru-gi with Hsihsiang-chi because he read not Hsihsiang-chi but Yingying-zhuan鶯鶯傳, which was a basis of Hsihsiang-chi. Meanwhile, most of Soeom-juin's way of reading was the imitation or variation of Jin Shengtan金聖嘆's critical commentary on Hsihsiang-chi. Therefore I concluded that Soeom-juin's critical commentary, as far as about preface and reading, was built on the superficial view with a lack of profound understanding about Hsihsiang-chi and Jin Shengtan's criticism.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 廣寒樓記, "광한루기 역주 연구", 부록 영인 자료, 1~117 (1997)
  2. "凌刻套板繪圖西廂記" (2005), 上海古籍出版社
  3. 金聖嘆, "金聖嘆評點才子全集 2", pp.1~146 (1997), 光明日報出版社
  4. 강국주, "일반논문: <鍾北小選?>의 改修와 작자 문제", 고전문학연구, 30(30), pp.287~321 (2006), 한국고전문학회
  5. 강명관, "18~19세기 京衙前과 예술활동의 양상 in 한국 근대문학사의 쟁점", pp.127~128 (1990), 창작과비평사
  6. 김동욱, "증보 춘향전 연구", pp.83~87 (1976), 연세대 출판부
  7. 김영진, "朴趾源의 필사본 小集들과 작품 창작년 고증", 대동한문학, 23, pp.56~57 (2005), 대동한문학회
  8. 김진영, "水山의 ?廣寒樓記?를 통해 본 知識層의 小說論", 어문연구, 42, pp.76~81 (2003), 어문연구학회
  9. 金台俊, "朝鮮小說史", pp.187~ (1990), 한길사
  10. 김풍기, "水山 廣寒樓記의 評批에 나타난 批評意識", 어문논집, 31, pp.220~227 (1992), 고려대
  11. 류준경, "한문본 춘향전의 작품 세계와 문학사적 위상", 박사, pp.2003
  12. 박희병, "연암산문 정독" (2007), 돌베개
  13. 성현경, "광한루기에 나타난 『춘향전』과 『서상기』", 광한루기 역주 연구, 143~159 (1997)
  14. 소재영, "水山 廣寒樓記 해제", 숭실어문, 4, pp.199~200 (1987), 숭실어문학회
  15. 정길수, "折花奇談? 연구 - 19세기 愛情傳奇 전통의 계승과 변용", 석사, pp.1999
  16. 정선희, "朝鮮後期 文人들의 金聖嘆 評批本에 대한 讀書 談論 硏究", 동방학지, 129(129), pp.305~345 (2005), 국학연구원
  17. 정하영, "<廣寒樓記> 評批 硏究", 한국고전연구, 1, pp.9~40 (1995), 한국고전연구회
  18. 조관희, "中國 古典小說 評點硏究 - 논의의 출발점 또는 예비적 탐색", 중국소설논총, 16, pp.57~64 (2002), 한국중국소설학회
  19. 조태영, "한국 고전소설 비평의 양상 in 한국 고전소설의 세계", pp.303~307 (2005), 돌베개

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)