策文의 특징과 글쓰기 -『策文準的』을 중심으로-
Characteristics of chaek-moon and writing -based upon chaek-moon-jun-jeok-
0
조회
0
다운로드
23
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
I have, in this study, investigated chaek-moon that can be comparable to discourse and writing today among the styles of Chinese writing. Chaek-moon is writing as well as discourse of the time from the viewpoint that it logically describes his or her opinion according to given subject. Chaek-moon prohibits vague expression away from given theme as well as brilliant sentence adornment, but it requires simple and clear writing based upon given topic. Chaek-moon also needs a certain type of form and writing skills, which is specifically described in 『chaek-moon-jun-jeok』 that combined departmental volumes of books in the latter half of the 17th century. Furthermore, we can also find out such things in 『dong-chaek-jung-soo』 that combined departmental volumes of books in earlier days than that time, which makes us guess that 『chaek-moon-jun-jeok』 could have been made based upon various chaek-moon collections or total collections of previous times. 『chaek-moon- jun-jeok』 and 『dong-chaek-jung-soo』 has proposed us a new way to conduct research in its direction-making away from its limit to research chaek-moon mostly based upon its contents, make us investigate how the form and writing skills of chaek-moon really are reflected onto chaek-moon. In addition, the research on chaek-moon that has represented traditional writing can be significantly meaningful in illuminating epoch-making implication and exploring a new horizon at present.
Abstract
I have, in this study, investigated chaek-moon that can be comparable to discourse and writing today among the styles of Chinese writing. Chaek-moon is writing as well as discourse of the time from the viewpoint that it logically describes his or her opinion according to given subject. Chaek-moon prohibits vague expression away from given theme as well as brilliant sentence adornment, but it requires simple and clear writing based upon given topic. Chaek-moon also needs a certain type of form and writing skills, which is specifically described in 『chaek-moon-jun-jeok』 that combined departmental volumes of books in the latter half of the 17th century. Furthermore, we can also find out such things in 『dong-chaek-jung-soo』 that combined departmental volumes of books in earlier days than that time, which makes us guess that 『chaek-moon-jun-jeok』 could have been made based upon various chaek-moon collections or total collections of previous times. 『chaek-moon- jun-jeok』 and 『dong-chaek-jung-soo』 has proposed us a new way to conduct research in its direction-making away from its limit to research chaek-moon mostly based upon its contents, make us investigate how the form and writing skills of chaek-moon really are reflected onto chaek-moon. In addition, the research on chaek-moon that has represented traditional writing can be significantly meaningful in illuminating epoch-making implication and exploring a new horizon at present.
참고문헌 (27)
- 奇遵, "德陽遺稿", 민족문화추진회
- "東人策選", 국립중앙도서관
- "東策精粹", 국립중앙도서관
- 朴文鎬, "壺山詩文評 in: 수정증보 『韓國詩話叢編』 13" (1996), 태학사
- 朴趾源, "燕巖集", 민족문화추진회
- 徐師曾, "文體明辨" (1991), 中文出版社
- 柳壽垣, "迂書 in:고전국역총서", 민족문화추진회
- 李裕元, "林下筆記", 성균관대 대동문화연구원
- 李瀷, "星湖僿說 in:고전국역총서", 민족문화추진회
- 李憲明, "西淵聞見錄", 서울대 규장각
- "殿策精粹", 서울대 규장각
- 正祖, "弘齋全書", 민족문화추진회
- "策文準的"
- 崔漢綺, "人政 in:고전국역총서", 민족문화추진회
- 許筠, "惺所覆瓿藁", 한국문집총간, 74, 민족문화추진회
- 강민구, "18세기의 誹謗的 文學 批評에 대한 一 見解 -林象鼎의 ‘文人相輕’에 대한 對策文을 중심으로-", 한문교육연구, 12 (1998), 한국한문교육학회
- 곽신환, "李栗谷의 策文 硏究", 유교사상연구, 7 (1994), 한국유교학회
- 金炯秀, "策問을 통해 본 李齊賢의 現實認識", 한국중세사연구, 13, pp.179~206 (2002), 한국중세사학회
- 徐復觀, "한문문체론 연구" (2000), 태학사
- 심경호, "한문산문의 미학" (1998), 고려대학교 출판부
- 이가원, "한문 문체의 분류적 검토", 아세아연구, 3 (1960), 고려대 아세아문제연구소
- 陳必祥, "한문문체론" (2001), 이회
- 최식, "奏議類 散文의 特徵과 展開樣相", 동방한문학, 31(31), pp.203~226 (2006), 동방한문학회
- 동방학문학회, "한국한문학의 이론-산문" (2007), 보고사
- 황의열, "한국 문집의 분체분류 연구Ⅰ", 한문학보, 5 (2001), 우리한문학회
- 황의열, "한문 문체 분류의 재검토", 태동고전연구, 17 (2000), 태동고전연구소
- 褚斌杰, "中國古代文體槪論" (1999), 북경대학출판사
