이자제한법에 의한 고리규제
Higher Interst rate restrictions by Interst limitation Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Interest limitation act as recommended by the IMF in 1998, was abolished. After its abrogation, higher interest rates were to prevail in our country. As a result, are experiencing a lot of credit delinquents, and many ordinary people were suffer. And the statute of limitations with regard to the resurrection of discussions was a lot. On 29 March 2007 and the statute of limitations has been resurrected. In a newly enacted Act, case and the theory under the Repealed Act is reflected in the legislation. The purpose of this Act is to contribute by deciding the appropriate maximum limit for the stability of national economic life and the realization of economic justice and regulations. Restrictions on the highest rate, pre-paid interest, and for the regulations were considered. Limit exceeded, especially in the source and cover for the rules and continue to acknowledge the return. In particular the debtor exceeds the maximum interest rate if you exceed the monies paid for arbitrarily large amount of interest being paid on the original,the original claim for the return of the defunct when you can.
Abstract
Interest limitation act as recommended by the IMF in 1998, was abolished. After its abrogation, higher interest rates were to prevail in our country. As a result, are experiencing a lot of credit delinquents, and many ordinary people were suffer. And the statute of limitations with regard to the resurrection of discussions was a lot. On 29 March 2007 and the statute of limitations has been resurrected. In a newly enacted Act, case and the theory under the Repealed Act is reflected in the legislation. The purpose of this Act is to contribute by deciding the appropriate maximum limit for the stability of national economic life and the realization of economic justice and regulations. Restrictions on the highest rate, pre-paid interest, and for the regulations were considered. Limit exceeded, especially in the source and cover for the rules and continue to acknowledge the return. In particular the debtor exceeds the maximum interest rate if you exceed the monies paid for arbitrarily large amount of interest being paid on the original,the original claim for the return of the defunct when you can.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김계순, "고율의 이자약정의 효력 - 대법원 2007. 2. 15. 선고, 2004다50426 전원합의체 판결 -", 민주법학, (36), pp.259~283 (2008), 민주주의법학연구회
- 김대정, "현행법상 利子制限에 관한 연구", 중앙법학, 9(2), pp.315~364 (2007), 중앙법학회
- 金相容, "韓國에서의 利子制限의 歷史的 變遷", 民事法硏究, 2 (1997), 法元社
- 金相容, "韓國에서의 利子制限의 歷史的 變遷", 司法行政, 35(11) (1994), 韓國司法行政學會
- 김상찬, "고율의 이자약정과 반사회성에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 32(32), pp.149~169 (2008), 한국법학회
- 남윤봉, "이자의 새로운 법적 규제", 법학논총, 24(2) (2007), 법학연구소
- 박종권, "고율의 이자약정의 효력에 관한 고찰", 경기법학논총, (8) (2009), 경기대학교 법학연구소
- 서광민, "이자제한법의 해석적용상 문제점", 고시계 (1996)
- 신인주, "이자제한을 위한 바람직한 입법방향", 법과사회, 22, pp.187~213 (2002), 법과사회이론학회
- 梁彰洙, "이자채권", 고시연구 (1992)
- 어인의, "이자제한법론" (1992), 청주대학교 출판부
- 이은희, "신자유주의와 이자제한법, 제6주제 발제문", ~
- 서민금융 질서회복을 위한 대부업 관련 법제연구, "한정미", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2008)
- 곽윤직, "채권총론" (2003), 박영사
- 이은영, "채권총론" (2009), 박영사
- 정기웅, "채권총론" (2009), 법문사
- Treitel, "The Law of Contract, 9th ed." (1995), Sweet & Maxwell
- 山口純夫, "債權總論" (1993), 靑林書院
- 近江幸治, "擔保制度の硏究" (1989), 成文堂
- 前田達明, "(口述)債權總論" (1991), 成文堂
- 淡路剛久, "債權總論" (2002), 有斐閣
- 中田裕康, "債權總論" (2007), 岩波書店
- 小野秀誠, "消費者消費貸借と貸金業法(1)(2)", 一橋法學, 6(2) (2007)
- 水邊芳郞, "債權總論" (2006), 法律文化社
- 平野裕之, "債權總論" (2005), 信山社
- 前田耕造, "利息の制限, 契約法大系(3), 賃貸借 消費貸借" (1972), 有斐閣