측정과제에서 학습부진아와 학습우수아의 안구운동 비교
The Comparison of Eye Movement in Measuring Tasks between the Underachievers and the Overachievers
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference between eye movements according to science achievement of elementary school students on measuring tasks. Science achievement was graded by the results of Korea national achievement test conducted in 2012. As an assessment tool to check measuring task, two measuring measure problems from TSPS(Test of Science Process Skill; developed in 1994) which were suitable for eye tracking system were adopted. The subjects of this study were 3 underachievers and 3 overachievers from 6th grade who agreed to participate in the research. SMI was used to collect EMD (eye movement data). Experiment 3.2 and BeGaze 3.2 programs were used to plan experiment and analyze EMD. As a result, eye movements of participants in measuring task did not show the path to the common gaze by groups. To solve the problem of using specific measuring strategies related to the correct answer. Underachiever who failed in measuring tasks don’t have enough measurement capabilities and lack eye movement through the area of interest for cognitive thinking. These results show that elementary school science curriculum dealing with measuring have to reflect a lot of step-by-step learning requires.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference between eye movements according to science achievement of elementary school students on measuring tasks. Science achievement was graded by the results of Korea national achievement test conducted in 2012. As an assessment tool to check measuring task, two measuring measure problems from TSPS(Test of Science Process Skill; developed in 1994) which were suitable for eye tracking system were adopted. The subjects of this study were 3 underachievers and 3 overachievers from 6th grade who agreed to participate in the research. SMI was used to collect EMD (eye movement data). Experiment 3.2 and BeGaze 3.2 programs were used to plan experiment and analyze EMD. As a result, eye movements of participants in measuring task did not show the path to the common gaze by groups. To solve the problem of using specific measuring strategies related to the correct answer. Underachiever who failed in measuring tasks don’t have enough measurement capabilities and lack eye movement through the area of interest for cognitive thinking. These results show that elementary school science curriculum dealing with measuring have to reflect a lot of step-by-step learning requires.
참고문헌 (29)
- 최현동, "과학 교과서의 표를 해석하는 초등교사들의 안구 운동 추적", 초등과학교육, 31(3), pp.358~371 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 최현동, "초등과학영재와 일반 아동의 분류 과정에서 나타나는 안구 운동 패턴의 차이", 초등과학교육, 31(4), pp.501~512 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Coelho, S, "Pupil's reasoning and practice during hands-on activities in the measurement phase", Research in Science & Technological Education, 16(1), pp.79~96 (1998)
- Hackling, M. W, "The development of expertise in science investigation skills", Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(4), pp.80~86 (1995)
- Holmes, "Teach measurement in elementary school science" (1991), NSTA
- Holmqvist, K., "Eye tracking:A comprehensive guide to methods and measures", pp.9~144 (2011), Oxford University Press
- 홍미영, "우리나라 중학생들의 과학적 탐구 및 과학의 본성 영역에서의 국제 성취도 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(2), pp.336~344 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
- Jones, N. A., "Electroencephalogram asymmetry during emotionally evocative films and its relation to positive and negative affectivity", Brain Cognition, 20(2), pp.280~299 (1992)
- Jung, G., "Performance assessment of elementary school children's measuring skills", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 17(2), pp.127~137 (1997)
- Kim, H., "Assessment of measuring ability and analysis of confidence about measuring result in elementary school high graders", 석사, pp.2005
- 김규정, "시선 움직임을 통한 효과적 게임 UI 연구", 기초조형학연구, 12(5), pp.55~64 (2011), 한국기초조형학회
- Kim, S., "The effect of observation․classification․measurement training elementary school students’ science process skills and attitude", 석사, pp.2000
- 김유미, "영재와 일반아의 뇌 기능 비교", 교육심리연구, 25(1), pp.111~130 (2011), 한국교육심리학회
- Kwon, J., "The development of an instrument for the measurement of science process skills of the Korean elementary and middle school students", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 14(3), pp.251~264 (1994)
- Lee, M., "선택적 주의집중 인공시각 시스템", Magazine of the IEEK, 36(11), pp.52~65 (2009)
- 이수범, "아이트래킹을 이용한 가상광고 수용자 효과 연구", 광고학연구, 22(5), pp.99~125 (2011), 한국광고학회
- Liu, C. J., "The influence of different representations on solving concentration problems at elementary school", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, pp.621~629 (2011)
- Lubben, F., "Children's ideas about the reliability of experimental data", International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), pp.791~806 (1996)
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, "Elementary guidebook for teacher Science Textbook 6-1" (2011), Kumsung publishing company
- Müller, H. J., "Visual search and selective attention", Visual Cognition, 14(4, pp.5 (2006), 6[DOI]
- PSSC, "PSSC 물리", pp.189~198 (1996), 탐구당
- 신동훈, "초등과학 교과서 삽화 이해 과정에서 나타나는 교사와 학생의 안구 운동의 차이", 생물교육, 41(2), pp.198~210 (2013), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 신원섭, "초등 교사들의 과학교과서 그래프 이해 과정에 대한 안구 운동 분석", 초등과학교육, 31(3), pp.386~397 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 신원섭, "관찰 문제에서 초등학생의 과학 학업성취도에 따른 안구운동 분석", 초등과학교육, 32(2), pp.185~197 (2013), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 신원섭, "변별과제에서 초등학생의 안구운동 분석을 통한 발견적 주의 모델 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(7), pp.1471~1485 (2013), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Yang, I. H., "Analysis of elementary students` confidence about measuring results", 과학교육논문집, 14(1), pp.149~169 (2004)
- 양일호, "미시발생학적 방법을 이용한 초등학생의 측정 능력 분석", 초등과학교육, 27(4), pp.341~355 (2008), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Yang, S., "A study of correlations among measurement abilities, mathematical concept and problem-solving abilities on young children", The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 5(3), pp.103~122 (2001)
- Yoon, H., "An analysis on the measurement sense of the elementary students", 석사, pp.2000