초등과학영재와 일반 아동의 분류 과정에서 나타나는 안구 운동 패턴의 차이
Differences in Eye Movement Pattern during the Classification between the Gifted and General Students in Elementary Schools
0
조회
0
다운로드
27
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to identify the differences in eye movement pattern shown in classification activities between the gifted and regular students in elementary schools. The subjects for the research consisted of five gifted students in the special education center for the gifted at Seoul National University of Education and five students at D regular elementary schools. SMI (Senso Motoric Instruments)' iView XTM RED 120 Hz was used in order to collect eye movement data. Results were as follows. There were difference patterns between the gifted and the regular student in question identification, attribute observation, and criteria generation process. Gifted students minimized unnecessary cognitive overload and took advantage of cognitive economic efficiency. Regular students have a lot of cognitive burden because they did not grasp the essential information.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the differences in eye movement pattern shown in classification activities between the gifted and regular students in elementary schools. The subjects for the research consisted of five gifted students in the special education center for the gifted at Seoul National University of Education and five students at D regular elementary schools. SMI (Senso Motoric Instruments)' iView XTM RED 120 Hz was used in order to collect eye movement data. Results were as follows. There were difference patterns between the gifted and the regular student in question identification, attribute observation, and criteria generation process. Gifted students minimized unnecessary cognitive overload and took advantage of cognitive economic efficiency. Regular students have a lot of cognitive burden because they did not grasp the essential information.
참고문헌 (46)
- 강성주, "과학 영재의 역량 탐색 및 역량 사전의 개발", 영재교육연구, 22(2), pp.353~370 (2012), 한국영재학회[DOI]
- 권용주, "과학지식의 생성과 평가" (2011), 학지사
- 김경민, "초등과학영재와 일반아동의 분류 능력 차이", 한국과학교육학회지, 31(5), pp.709~719 (2011), 한국과학교육학회
- 김경화, "뇌파검사를 활용한 과학영재의 판별 및 이에 기반한 선발 체계의 구안", 박사, pp.2005
- 김유미, "영재와 일반아의 뇌 기능 비교", 교육심리연구, 25(1), pp.111~130 (2011), 한국교육심리학회
- 김지호, "광고의 깊이지각 단서가 시각적 주의에 미치는 영향에 대한 아이트래커 활용 연구", 한국광고홍보학보, 9(2), pp.277~310 (2007), 한국광고홍보학회
- 김태용, "신문만평 독자의 시선 움직임과 해독에 관한 연구", 한국언론학보, 50(3), pp.231~261 (2006), 한국언론학회
- 김태용, "유명 여성모델이 등장하는 TV광고에 대한 시청자들의 시선이동", 광고학연구, 19(3), pp.103~115 (2008), 한국광고학회
- 이길재, "뇌 기능의 공동작용에서 나타난 과학영재와 일반학생의 뇌파 특성", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), pp.415~424 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 박숙희, "소외계층 영재교육", 영재와 영재교육, 8(3), pp.5~21 (2009), 한국영재교육학회
- 배진수, "영재아동의 교육을 위한 부모와 교사의 역할", 아동교육연구, 5, pp.181~223 (1995)
- 신동훈, "생물학 가설 생성에서 나타나는 과학적 감성의 생성 과정 설명을 위한 신경 인지적 모형 개발", 생물교육, 34(2), pp.232~245 (2006), 한국생물교육학회
- 신원섭, "초등 교사들의 과학교과서 그래프 이해 과정에 대한 안구 운동 분석", 초등과학교육, 31(3), pp.386~397 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 양일호, "초등학교 과학 탐구과정 요소별 지도자료: 사다리 타고 오르는 통합 탐구 여행", 교육인적자원부, ~ (2007)
- 유미현, "과학영재교육원 관찰․추천 방식의 영재선발 분석", 과학영재교육, 3(2), pp.27~38 (2011)
- 이기영, "과학영재교육. 과학 영재 선발에 사용된 지필 검사 문항의 질적 및 양적 측성 분석: 2007-2008년 강원대학교 영재 교육원 선발 문항을 중심으로", 과학영재교육, 1(3), pp.43~58 (2009)
- 이명자, "과학영재의 특성 분석", 교육학논총, 23(1), pp.127~140 (2002)
- 이수범, "아이트래킹을 이용한 가상광고 수용자 효과 연구", 광고학연구, 22(5), pp.99~125 (2011), 한국광고학회
- 이인호, "영재교육 대상자 선발에서 교사 추천의 효용성 분석", 영재교육연구, 19(2), pp.381~404 (2009), 한국영재학회
- 최현동, "과학 교과서의 표를 해석하는 초등교사들의 안구 운동 추적", 초등과학교육, 31(3), pp.358~371 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 최현동, "초등학교 6학년의 인공자극과 자연자극에 대한 분류 사고", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(1), pp.40~48 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 영재성 판별도구의 개발과 적용, "최호성", 부산광역시영재교육진흥원, ~ (2010)
- Ahern, G. L., "Differential lateralization for positive and negative emotion in the human brain: EEG spectral analysis", Neuropsychologia, 23(6), pp.745~755 (1985)
- Baer, J., "Creative teachers, creative students" (1997), Allyn & Bacon
- Baker, D. R., "Constructing science in middle and secondary school classrooms" (1997), Allyn and Bacon
- Balchin, T., "Teacher nominations of giftedness: Investigating the beliefs of British G & T co-ordinators", Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, pp.34~35 (2008)
- Cook, M., "The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic and molecular representations", Science Education, 92(5), pp.848~867 (2008)
- Cook, M., "Comparing visual representation of DNA in two multimedia presentations", Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 20(1), pp.21~42 (2011)
- George, F., "Transforming fiftes into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory, In Handbook of gifted education 3rd ed", pp.60~74 (2003), Allyn & Bacon
- Goldberg, J. H., "Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(6), pp.631~645 (1999)
- Grossen, B., "Science: Educational tools for diverse learners", School Psychology Review, 23(3), pp.442~463 (1994)
- Henderson, J. M., "Visual attention and eye movement control during reading and picture viewing, In Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene per-Ception and reading", pp.260~283 (1992), Springer-Verlag
- Holmqvist, K., "Eye tracking : A comprehensive guide to methods and measures", pp.9~144 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Jones, N. A., "Electroencephalogram asymmetry during emotionally evocative films and its relation to positive and negative affectivity", Brain Cognition, 20(2), pp.280~299 (1992)
- Lawson, A., "Hypothetico-deductive reasoning skill and concept acquisition: Testing a constructivist hypothesis", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), pp.953~972 (1991)
- Liu, C. J., "The influence of different representations on solving concentration problems at elementary school", J Sci Educ Technol, 20, pp.621~629 (2011)
- Liu, H. C., "Using eye-tracking technology to investigate the redundant effect of multimedia web pages on viewers’ cognitive processes", Computers in Human Behavior, 27, pp.2410~2417 (2011)
- Mintzes, J. J., "Teaching science for understanding" (1998), Academic Press
- Pfeiffer, S. I., "Challenges and oportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say", Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, pp.161~169 (2003)
- Schroth, S. T., "Identifying gifted students: Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures", Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, pp.155~179 (2008)
- Senso Motoric Instruments, "BeGaze Manual version 3.1", ~ (2011)
- Senso Motoric Instruments, "iView X TM Manual", ~ (2011)
- Siegle, D., "Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs", Gigted Child Quarterly, 48, pp.21~29 (2004)
- Slykhuis, D. A., "Eyetracking students’ attention to powerpoint photographs in science education", Journal Science Education and Technology, 14(6), pp.509~520 (2005)
- Tsai, M. J., "Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis", Computer & Education, 58, pp.375~385 (2012)
- van Tassel-Baska, J., "Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR", Gifted child Quarterly, 46, pp.110~123 (2002)
