초등학생의 창의적 과학문제해결과정 분석
Analysis of Creative Science Problem Solving Process of Elementary School Students
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze the process of creative science problem solving (CSPS) in elementary school students. To do this, 6 graders (n=9) at a elementary school in Seoul were participated. In this study, fixed eye-tracker with 250 Hz sampling and observation camera were used. The results of this study, the students with higher ability to solve creative science problems had a slower saccade, and had more visual attention on core clues and a greater number of eye changes. Therefore, students with higher ability to solve creative science problems showed more effective eye movement and faster information processing to solve problems. The CSPS types of elementary students were classified as ‘declarative knowledge type’, ‘procedural knowledge type’, ‘conditional knowledge type’, ‘knowledge lack type’. Because each type appears to be complementary, CSPS process for elementary students who have integrated the four types was devised. The results of this study can be used as basic data for understanding elementary school students’ CSPS and will help to develop and guide creative science teaching and learning programs useful to elementary school students and science gifted students.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the process of creative science problem solving (CSPS) in elementary school students. To do this, 6 graders (n=9) at a elementary school in Seoul were participated. In this study, fixed eye-tracker with 250 Hz sampling and observation camera were used. The results of this study, the students with higher ability to solve creative science problems had a slower saccade, and had more visual attention on core clues and a greater number of eye changes. Therefore, students with higher ability to solve creative science problems showed more effective eye movement and faster information processing to solve problems. The CSPS types of elementary students were classified as ‘declarative knowledge type’, ‘procedural knowledge type’, ‘conditional knowledge type’, ‘knowledge lack type’. Because each type appears to be complementary, CSPS process for elementary students who have integrated the four types was devised. The results of this study can be used as basic data for understanding elementary school students’ CSPS and will help to develop and guide creative science teaching and learning programs useful to elementary school students and science gifted students.
참고문헌 (31)
- Anderson, J. R., "The architecture of cognition" (1983), Harvard University Press
- Basaraba, D., "Exploring the utility of student-think alouds for providing insights into students’ metacognitive and problem-solving processes during assessment development", pp.1~11 (2013), Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness
- 최현동, "초등과학영재와 일반 아동의 분류 과정에서 나타나는 안구 운동 패턴의 차이", 초등과학교육, 31(4), pp.501~512 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Corbetta, M., "Attention modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans", Science, 248, pp.1556~1559 (1993)
- Corbetta, M., "Superior cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction", Science, 270, pp.802~805 (1995)
- Dunbar, K., "The nature of insight", pp.365~395 (1995), The MIT Press
- Holyoak, K. J., "Mental leaps : Analogy in creative thought" (1995), MIT Press
- Isaksen, S. G., "Versions of CPS" (1994), Cencer for Studies in Creativity, Buffalo State Colleage
- Jung, J. J., "Principles and practices of brain-based learning" (2015), Governor
- Kwon, M. J., "An analysis of the relationship between the scientifically gifted brain utilization and scientific creative problem solving ability", Gifted Education Research, 24(6), pp.961~974 (2014)
- 김지수, "초등학생들의 창의적 과학 문제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 시각화 활동 분석", 초등과학교육, 36(1), pp.73~84 (2017), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- 김용진, "창의적 과학문제 해결에서 초등학교 과학영재아와 보통아의 뇌파 활성 차이", 생물교육, 33(1), pp.23~32 (2005), 한국생물교육학회
- 이금녀, "맨발걷기 체험활동 프로그램이 초등학생의 뇌파 및 두뇌활용능력에 미치는 영향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(8), pp.219~238 (2019), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- 이수진, "초등 과학 영재와 일반 아동의 과학 창의적 문제 해결 과정에서 나타난 사고 유형 및 특성", 초등과학교육, 25(5), pp.567~581 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 임채성, "뇌기반 진화적 접근법에 따른 창의적 과학 문제해결 지도 모형 개발", 생물교육, 40(4), pp.429~452 (2012), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 임채성, "과학창의성 평가 공식의 개발과 적용", 초등과학교육, 33(2), pp.242~257 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- Mednick, S., "The associative basis of the creative process", Psychological Review, 69, pp.220~232 (1962)
- Ministry of Education, "Revised primary school science curriculum", Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74, ~ (2015)
- Müller, H. J., "Visual search and selective attention", Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), pp.389~410 (2006)
- Mumford, M. D., "Domain-based scoring in divergent-thinking tests : Validation evidence in an occupational sample", Creativity Research Journal, 11, pp.151~163 (1998)
- Navalpakkam, V., "A goal oriented attention guidance model", Biologically Motivated Computer Vision Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 25, pp.453~461 (2002)
- 심혜진, "과학 영재 아동과 일반 아동의 창의적 과학 문제 해결 과정에 대한 사례 연구", 초등과학교육, 25(5), pp.532~547 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 신동훈, "초등 과학 교육에서 두뇌 연구 방법의 고찰-fMRI 활용법을 중심으로-", 초등과학교육, 26(1), pp.49~62 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 신원섭, "초등과학 교육연구에서 시선추적 연구방법의 고찰", 초등과학교육, 35(3), pp.288~304 (2016), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- 신원섭, "관찰 문제에서 초등학생의 과학 학업성취도에 따른 안구운동 분석", 초등과학교육, 32(2), pp.185~197 (2013), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 신원섭, "변별과제에서 초등학생의 안구운동 분석을 통한 발견적 주의 모델 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(7), pp.1471~1485 (2013), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 신원섭, "실제 과학수업에서 시선추적과 주의력 검사를 통한 초등학생들의 주의 특성 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 36(4), pp.705~715 (2016), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Slykhuis, D. A., "Eye-tracking students’ attention to powerpoint photographs in science education", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(6), pp.509~520 (2005)
- Snowden, R., "Basic vision: An introduction to visual perception" (2011), Hakjisa
- Torrance, E. P., "The torrance tests of creative thinking norms - Technical manual figural (streamlined)forms A & B" (1998), Scholastic Testing Service, Inc
- 유태선, "초등학생의 과학 창의적 문제 해결과정에 대한 사례 연구", 한국초등교육, 28, pp.53~69 (2017), 초등교육연구원[DOI]