본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국·내외 초등학교 융합 과학 교육 프로그램 탐색 - 한국, 미국, 영국을 중심으로 -

Exploring Domestic and International Elementary School Convergence Science Education Program - Korea, the U.S., and the U.K. -

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This study is subject to compare the STEAM and the STEM education of Korea, the U.K., and the U.S. to find their differences and similarities, as well as the implications in implementing the STEAM education in Korea. In order to accomplish this, the educational objectives, contents and topics, teaching and learning methods, subjects and timing for education, and convergence curriculum were compared; also, after choosing the representative program of each country, a cross-comparative analysis was done for the teaching and learning method distribution ratio, content element distribution ratio, program distribution ratio, STEAM domain ratio, curriculum structure and domain ratio, frequency of inquiry process, basic inquiry, integrated inquiry frequency, hourly basic inquiry, and integrated inquiry process. As a result, it was possible to obtain 77 programs, a total of 656 class hours of Korea, 65 programs and 846 class hours of the U.S., and 75 programs and 774 class hours of the U.K. The results are as follows: Korea’s STEAM and the U.K. and the U.S.’ STEM all include science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics, but in terms of frequency, Korea’s STEAM has higher figure in arts. However, the U.K. and the U.S. have higher frequency of debate and discussion, and there were many cases of a student, after receiving feedback from other students, modifying the work.

Abstract

This study is subject to compare the STEAM and the STEM education of Korea, the U.K., and the U.S. to find their differences and similarities, as well as the implications in implementing the STEAM education in Korea. In order to accomplish this, the educational objectives, contents and topics, teaching and learning methods, subjects and timing for education, and convergence curriculum were compared; also, after choosing the representative program of each country, a cross-comparative analysis was done for the teaching and learning method distribution ratio, content element distribution ratio, program distribution ratio, STEAM domain ratio, curriculum structure and domain ratio, frequency of inquiry process, basic inquiry, integrated inquiry frequency, hourly basic inquiry, and integrated inquiry process. As a result, it was possible to obtain 77 programs, a total of 656 class hours of Korea, 65 programs and 846 class hours of the U.S., and 75 programs and 774 class hours of the U.K. The results are as follows: Korea’s STEAM and the U.K. and the U.S.’ STEM all include science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics, but in terms of frequency, Korea’s STEAM has higher figure in arts. However, the U.K. and the U.S. have higher frequency of debate and discussion, and there were many cases of a student, after receiving feedback from other students, modifying the work.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 권난주, "융합 및 통합 과학교육 관련 국내 연구 동향 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(2), pp.265~278 (2012), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  2. "Cedar Park Elementary School"[URL]
  3. "CREST"[URL]
  4. "EIE (Engineering is Elementary®)"[URL]
  5. Gwak, B., "Knowledge fusion era and integrated curriculum", Journal of Curriculum Integration, 4, pp.1~13 (2009)
  6. "I3 (Invention-Innovation-Inquiry"[URL]
  7. "IMSA Fusion"[URL]
  8. ITEA(International Technology Education Association), "Standards for technological literacy : Content for the study of technology" (2000), Author
  9. 강충열, "미래형 초등통합교육과정 개정 방향", 통합교육과정연구, 3(2), pp.19~41 (2009), 한국통합교육과정학회
  10. "STEN 교육 국제 세미나 및 STEAM 교사연구회 오리엔테이션 자료집" (2011)[URL]
  11. Lee, I., "지식의 대융합" (2008), Godswin
  12. Lee, J., "The cognitive science and the convergence of interdisciplinary principles and practices", Journal of Social Sciences, 32(1), pp.3~46 (2010)
  13. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development, "초등학교 교사용 과학 지도서" (2001), Author
  14. Ministry of Education, "초등학교 교육과정 해설서" (1997), Author
  15. 문대영, "STEM 통합 접근의 사전 공학교육 프로그램 모형 개발", 공학교육연구, 11(2), pp.90~101 (2008), 한국공학교육학회
  16. 최유현, "기술교과의 창의적 문제해결 중심 학습 교재개발을 위한 학습 활동 분석과 선정", 한국실과교육학회지, 20(2), pp.217~235 (2007), 한국실과교육학회
  17. "Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics" (1989)[URL]
  18. A framework for K-12 science education practices, cross cutting concepts, and core ideas, "NRC(National Research Council)", National Academy of Science, ~ (2011)
  19. "Nuffield Foundation"[URL]
  20. 박선형, "지식융합: 지식경영적 접근과 이해", 교육학연구, 48(1), pp.83~101 (2010), 한국교육학회
  21. Sanders, M., "A rationale for new approaches to STEM education and STEM education graduate programs", 93rd Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference, Nashville, TN, pp.1~17 (2006)
  22. Sanders, M., "STEM, STEM education, STEM mania", The Technology Teacher, 68(4), pp.20~26 (2009)
  23. "Science Technology Concepts ProgramTM"[URL]
  24. Woo, J, "The development of a test of earth science inquiry skills for high school student", Journal of Science Education, 15(3), pp.91~103 (1995)
  25. "STΣ@M education : An overview of creating a model of integrative education, PATT" (2008)[URL]
  26. Yakman, G., "Using BADUK to teach purposefully integrated. STEM", STEAM education, 2007, ~
  27. "Young engineers"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)