본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Exploring the Exemplary STEAM Education in the U.S. as a Practical Educational Framework for Korea

2

조회

0

다운로드

40

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education in the U.S. has been identified as a significant national reform in K-16 education and curriculum in order to prepare students for the global economy of the 21st century. Korea has been facing very similar challenges to improve science, technology and mathematics education, in particular, the affective aspect of learning science and mathematics. Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) education has become a crucial issue in Korean education system. The major purpose of this exploratory study is to inform the exemplary framework of STEAM education in the U.S. for Korea and to provide descriptive and analytical accounts on STEAM teaching and learning as an innovative integrated convergence education. This study integrates the outcomes of research papers on STEM education and recent literature. It employs content analysis methodology qualitatively by analyzing and synthesizing the findings, conclusions, discussions, and recommendations of accumulated research works related to STEM/STEAM education. This study will help gain a stronger sense of the STEAM framework and will guide to develop the educational programs for Korea.

Abstract

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education in the U.S. has been identified as a significant national reform in K-16 education and curriculum in order to prepare students for the global economy of the 21st century. Korea has been facing very similar challenges to improve science, technology and mathematics education, in particular, the affective aspect of learning science and mathematics. Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) education has become a crucial issue in Korean education system. The major purpose of this exploratory study is to inform the exemplary framework of STEAM education in the U.S. for Korea and to provide descriptive and analytical accounts on STEAM teaching and learning as an innovative integrated convergence education. This study integrates the outcomes of research papers on STEM education and recent literature. It employs content analysis methodology qualitatively by analyzing and synthesizing the findings, conclusions, discussions, and recommendations of accumulated research works related to STEM/STEAM education. This study will help gain a stronger sense of the STEAM framework and will guide to develop the educational programs for Korea.

참고문헌 (68)

  1. Oxford University Press, , 1993
  2. Oxford University Press, , 1998
  3. 2007, , ~
  4. Basic research for establishing the direction of STEAM education in Korea, "Baek, Y.", Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity, ~ (2012)
  5. 백윤수, "우리나라 STEAM 교육의 방향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 11(4), pp.149~171 (2011), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  6. Barlex, D., "Interaction: the relationship between science and design and technology in the secondary school curriculum", pp.41~ (2000), Engineering Council
  7. Berger, E. H., "Multiple Intelligences : Enabling Diverse Learning", Early Childhood Education Journal, 23(4), pp.249~ (1996)
  8. Bloom, B. S., "An introduction to mastery learning theory, In Schools, society and mastery learning" (1974), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  9. "Lifelong learning Korea's strategy for standards education" (2011)[URL]
  10. Chu, B., "Moral education in Korea: Curriculum and teacher education", Paper presented at the annual conference of the Georgia Council for the Social Studies (1996)
  11. Dakers, J. R., "Towards a philosophy for technology education. Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an epistemological framework" (2006), Palgrave Macmillan
  12. de Vries, M. J., "Technology education: Beyond the technology is applied science", Journal of Technology Education, 8(1), pp.7~15 (1996)
  13. DeBoer, G. E., "A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for practice" (1991), Teachers College, Columbia University
  14. Dewey, J., "Democracy and education" (1916), Macmillan Publishing Company
  15. Driscoll, M. P., "Constructivism. In Psychology of learning for instruction" (2005), Pearson
  16. Driver, D., "Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom", Educational Researcher, 23(7), pp.8~ (1994)
  17. Ernest, P., "Mathematics, Education and Philosophy: An international perspective" (1994), Falmer Press
  18. Featherstone, J. L., "Forward, In Orators & philosophers: A history of the idea of liberal education" (1986), Teacher College Press
  19. Firlik, R., "Can We Adapt the Philosophies and Practices of Reggio Emilia, Italy, for Use in American Schools?", Early Childhood Education Journal, 23(4), pp.217~ (1996)
  20. Freire, P., "Pedagogy of the oppressed" (1996), Continuum International Publishing Group Inc
  21. Froebel., "Froebel, In Three thousand years of educational wisdom: Selections from great documents" (1947), Harvard University Press
  22. Furth, H. G., "Piaget for teachers" (1970), Prentice-Hall Inc
  23. Gardner, P. L., "The Roots of Technology and Science: A Philosophical and Historical View", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1-2) (1997)
  24. Hersh, R., "Fresh Breezes in the Philosophy of Mathematics, In Mathematics, education and philosophy: An international perspective" (1994), Falmer Press
  25. Huber, M. T., "The advancement of learning: Building the teaching commons" (2005), Jossey-Bass
  26. Huber, M. T., "Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground" (2002), American Association for Higher Education and The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
  27. "한국 청소년 '공동체 의식 희박" (2011)[URL]
  28. 2000, , ~
  29. "KBS World - Language" (2011)[URL]
  30. "KBS World Symbol" (2011)[URL]
  31. KOFAC, , 2011
  32. 권혁수, "Research Trends on the Integrative Efforts in Technology Education: Reviews of the Relevant Journals", 중등교육연구, 57(1), pp.245~274 (2009), 중등교육연구소
  33. Laporte, J., "The T", S, The Technology Teacher, pp.1993, 52(6)[DOI]
  34. Latour, B., "Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts" (1986), Princeton University Press
  35. Lauda, D. P., "Technology Education: A Concept in Transition", Paper presented at the Technology Education Symposium 80 (1980)
  36. 이효녕, "초등학생이 생각하는 과학자와 공학자에 대한 이미지", 실과교육연구, 16(4), pp.61~82 (2010), 한국실과교육연구학회
  37. Marzano, R., "The Art and Science of Teaching: A Comprehensive Framework for Effective Instruction" (2007), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  38. Merriam, S. B., "Case study research in education" (1998), Jossey-Bass Publishers
  39. Merriam, S. B., "Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation" (2009), Jossey-Bass Publishers
  40. The 2nd National Master Plan for Science and Technology Education, "Ministry of Education, Science and Technology", MEST, ~ (2010)
  41. The 2009 revised science curriculum, "Ministry of Education, Science and Technology", MEST, ~ (2011)
  42. 2012 national plan for STEAM education, "Ministry of Education, Science and Technology", MEST, ~ (2012)
  43. Minnis, M., "The Challenge of Integration in Interdisciplinary Education", New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2005(102), pp.45~ (2005)
  44. Mishook, J. J., "Arts Integration in an Era of Accountability", Arts Education Policy Review, 107(4), pp.3~ (2006)
  45. Montessori, M., "Dr. Montessori's Own Handbook" (1975), Schoecken
  46. National Academies Press, , 2004
  47. National Academies Press, , 2005
  48. 2004, , ~
  49. 1995, , ~
  50. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Principles and standards for school mathematics" (2000), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  51. National Academy Press, , 1996
  52. The National Academy Press, , 2012
  53. OECD, "Education at a glance: OECD indicators" (2010), OECD
  54. OECD, "PISA 2006 Science Competencies for tomorrow's world. Volume 1: Analysis" (2007), OECD
  55. "In a Wired South Korea, Robots Will Feel Right at Home" (2006)[URL]
  56. Paulos, J. A., "A mathematician reads the newspaper" (1995), Basic Books Harper Collins
  57. Petrina, S., "Multidisciplinary technology education", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(2), pp.36~ (1998)
  58. Pinch, T., "Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other", ~ (1994)
  59. Rogers, C., "Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become" (1969), Charles Merill
  60. Ruggiero, V. R., "Teaching thinking across the curriculum" (1988), Harper & Row
  61. Rutherford, F.J., "Science for all Americans" (1989), Oxford University Press
  62. Salinger, G. L., "The engineering of technology education", The Journal of Technology Studies (2005)
  63. Sanders, M., "A rationale for new approaches to STEM education and STEM education graduate programs", Paper presented at the 93rd Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference. Section IV: Issues in STEM Education (2006)
  64. Mark Sanders, "Integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Education: Contemporary Trends and Issues", 중등교육연구, 59(3), pp.729~762 (2011), 중등교육연구소
  65. Wicklein, R. C. S., "Case Studies of Multidisciplinary Approaches to Integrating Mathematics, Science and Technology Education", Journal of Technology Education, 6(2) (1995)
  66. Wiggins, G. P., "Understanding by design" (2005), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  67. Yakman, G, "$ST{\Sigma}@M$ Education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education", Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology 2008 Annual Proceedings (2008)
  68. Zuga, K., "A role for alternative curriculum theories in technology education", Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 30(4), pp.19~ (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)