우리나라 2009 개정 초등 과학교육과정과 핀란드 초등 과학교육과정 비교분석
Comparison and Analysis of the 2009 Elementary Science Curriculum of South Korea and the Elementary Science Curriculum of Finland
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the elementary science curriculum of Finland, which ranked at the first place in the science domain of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), a comparative study on the academic achievements of OECD member nations, for three consecutive years and recorded a high national competitiveness index, and that of South Korea, thus providing information needed to develop curriculums and textbooks in the middle of occasional curriculum revisions and giving useful implications for the implementation of curriculum in the field of education in South Korea. The research findings were as follows: First, as for the science content areas based on the ratio of large area items according to the evaluation and analysis framework of TIMSS 2007, South Korea's ratio of life, chemistry, physics, and earth hardly showed fitness for TIMSS 2007 and exhibited equal distribution among the areas. In Finland, the ratio of life, chemistry, physical, and earth was similar to the fourth grade level of TIMSS 2007. The country showed differential distribution with life accounting for the highest percentage. Second, as for the cognitive domains, South Korea showed a high percentage in “Uses and Procedures of Tools” of “1. Knowing” and “Making Connections,” “Comparison/Contrast/Classification,” and “Uses of Models” of “2. Application.” Finland recorded a high percentage in “Information Interpretation” of “2. Application.” While South Korea focused on the uses and methods of scientific instruments during scientific activities, Finland made an approach with a focus on problems related to daily life such as the interpretation of information including reports and graphs from an interpretative perspective.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the elementary science curriculum of Finland, which ranked at the first place in the science domain of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), a comparative study on the academic achievements of OECD member nations, for three consecutive years and recorded a high national competitiveness index, and that of South Korea, thus providing information needed to develop curriculums and textbooks in the middle of occasional curriculum revisions and giving useful implications for the implementation of curriculum in the field of education in South Korea. The research findings were as follows: First, as for the science content areas based on the ratio of large area items according to the evaluation and analysis framework of TIMSS 2007, South Korea's ratio of life, chemistry, physics, and earth hardly showed fitness for TIMSS 2007 and exhibited equal distribution among the areas. In Finland, the ratio of life, chemistry, physical, and earth was similar to the fourth grade level of TIMSS 2007. The country showed differential distribution with life accounting for the highest percentage. Second, as for the cognitive domains, South Korea showed a high percentage in “Uses and Procedures of Tools” of “1. Knowing” and “Making Connections,” “Comparison/Contrast/Classification,” and “Uses of Models” of “2. Application.” Finland recorded a high percentage in “Information Interpretation” of “2. Application.” While South Korea focused on the uses and methods of scientific instruments during scientific activities, Finland made an approach with a focus on problems related to daily life such as the interpretation of information including reports and graphs from an interpretative perspective.
참고문헌 (36)
- An, J., "The comparative Study of the STS Science Education between Korea and Finland on the PISA science Achivement", 석사, pp.2009
- Choa, H., "Comparative analysis between the Revised Science Curriculum 2009 and the Revised Science Curriculum 2007, the 7th Science Curriculum", 석사, pp.2010
- Chung, U., "Comparative study of middle school science curriculum between Korea and Singapore", 석사, pp.2002
- Finnish National Board of Education, "National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2004: National Core Curriculum for Basic Education Intended for Pupils in Compulsory Education. Vammala, Finland", ~ (2004)
- 홍후조, "학교시간운영의 효율화와 이수과목수의 적정화에 관한 연구", 교육과정연구, 26(4), pp.73~101 (2008), 한국교육과정학회
- 김대석, "학교 과학교육과정이 과학과 학업성취도에 미치는 영향의 크기 측정：한국과 핀란드의 PISA 2006 과학영역 비교를 중심으로", 교육과정연구, 28(1), pp.87~112 (2010), 한국교육과정학회
- 조덕주, "한국과 핀란드의 중학교 과학 교과서 비교 분석-생물 영역 단원 체제와 내용을 중심으로-", 비교교육연구, 23(3), pp.177~206 (2013), 한국비교교육학회
- Johanna, H., "Luonnonkirja 3" (2004), Wsoy
- Johanna, H., "Luonnonkirja 4" (2005), Wsoy
- Kim, B., "Exploration into the revision methods of the science curriculum", The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(3), pp.157~170 (2003)
- Kim, J., "An analysis of content optimization of science textbooks in the 7th elementary school curriculum", 석사, pp.2005
- Kim, J., "A study on the national core curriculum of finnish comprehensive school", 석사, pp.2013
- 김경자, "핀란드 종합학교(comprehensive school) 교육과정 편성 ․ 운영의 특징 고찰", 교육과정연구, 29(1), pp.111~135 (2011), 한국교육과정학회
- Trends in international mathematics and science study: Report of TIMSS 2007 Results, "Kim, K.", Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation, ~ (2008)
- Kim, K., "Comparison and analysis of curriculum and achievement characteristics between the high-ranked nations of PISA and TIMSS and South Korea", ~ (2009)
- Kim, K., "Research on the international comparison of OECD Academic Achievement: Report of PISA 2009 Results" (2010), Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation
- 김왕준, "홍콩, 싱가포르, 핀란드, 아일랜드의 교육개혁의 비전과 주요 정책", 초등교육연구, 23(3), pp.321~340 (2010), 한국초등교육학회
- Ko, Y., "A comparative study of Korea and Singapore elementary science textbooks according to TIMSS", 석사, pp.2011
- 권치순, "한국과 핀란드 초등과학 교과서의 체제와 내용 비교 분석", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 4(2), pp.134~141 (2011), 대한지구과학교육학회
- 이혜숙, "Bloom의 신교육 목표 분류틀에 기초한 중학교 생물 영역의 목표 분류", 생물교육, 34(3), pp.365~376 (2006), 한국생물교육학회
- Lee, J., "Analysis of the primary science textbooks in the 7th National Curriculum with TIMSS", 석사, pp.2004
- 이은영, "Bloom의 신 교육목표분류학에 따른 슬기로운 생활 교과의 수업 목표 분석", 초등과학교육, 31(1), pp.1~12 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Min, K., "Comparative analysis between the revised Science Curriculum 2007 and the 7th Science Curriculum:Focused on National Common Basic Curriculum", 석사, pp.2008
- General Theory of Elementary Curriculums, "Ministry of Education", Ministry of Education, ~, pp.Announcement 2009-41 (2009)
- General Explanation of the Revised Elementary Curriculum of 2009, "Ministry of Education", Ministry of Education, ~, pp.Announcement 2009-41 (2010)
- Elementary Curriculum according to the Revised Curriculum of 2009, "Ministry of Education", Ministry of Education, ~, pp.Announcement 2011-361 (2011)
- Science Curriculum according to the Revised Curriculum of 2009, "Ministry of Education", Ministry of Education, ~, pp.Announcement 2011-361 (2011)
- Ministry of Education, "Review Versions of Science, 3-1, 3-2, 4-1, 4-2" (2012)
- Mullis, I. V. S., "TIMSS 2007Assessment Frameworks" (2005), IEA
- "2004 Finland primary lower secondary 1-9 Curriculum 1 English version" (2009)[URL]
- Ryu, J., "Comparative study of science curriculum in Korea and New Zealand", 석사, pp.2007
- Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education, "National-Level Core Curriculums for Elementary and High School, A Visit to Finland", One of the Advanced Nations in Education, ~ (2007)
- "TIMSS 2007 International Science Report" (2007)[URL]
- "TIMSS 2007 Science framework" (2007)[URL]
- 위수민, "Bloom의 신교육 목표 분류학에 기초한 초등학교 3, 4학년 과학과 7차 교육과정과 2007 개정 과학과 교육과정의 목표체계 비교", 초등과학교육, 30(1), pp.10~21 (2011), 한국초등과학교육학회
- The Global Competitiveness Report 2006-7, "World Economic Forum", ~ (2006)